ΓΙΑ ΟΣΟΥΣ ΕΧΟΥΝ… ΧΡΟΝΟ, ΑΛΛΑ ΚΑΙ… ΜΕΡΑΚΙ!
Παρακάτω σας έχω κάποια άρθρα και όσοι θέλετε μελετήστε τα! Παράλληλα σας θυμίζω και κάποια πραγματάκια!..
1. Θυμίζω: Τον Χάρτη αυτόν σας τον έχω ξαναπαρουσιάσει, αλλά κρίνω ότι πρέπει και πάλι να σας τον δείξω!
ΝΑ ΤΙ ΘΕΛΕΙ ΤΟ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ!
– Είναι αυτό που κάποιοι παρουσίασαν και παρουσιάζουν ως ελληνικό σχέδιο, (“EAST-MED PIPELINE“), αλλά η ΑΛΗΘΕΙΑ είναι ότι πρόκειται γι’ αυτό που ακριβώς έχει –και ορθώς(!)– προκρίνει το Ισραήλ, για την περιοχή μας και έχει κάνει την… εμφάνισή του εδώ,… στα μέρη μας, (έστω αχνά), από το 2010 να πω(;)! Ο “ΑΡΧΑΓΓΕΛΟΣ“ μας το είχε αναπτύξει (δηλαδή τί θα έκανε αυτός αν ήταν Ισραηλινός) και “έπεσε μέσα”, από το 2009 ακόμα, κάνοντας χρήση της λογικής στις… “Πληροφορίες”, παρά τα όσα μας… δίδασκε! (Σχολείο για “Προχωρημένους”)!
– Αυτό το σχέδιο (πολύ επιφανειακά σας -το- γράφω) είχε προκαλέσει την οργή των “Δημοκρατών” Κυβερνητών των Η.Π.Α. (Ομπάμα – Κλίντον), οι οποίοι ήθελαν (ηλιθίως) αγωγούς και μέσα από την Τουρκία, (ένα Α-ΣΤΑ-ΘΕ-ΣΤΑ- ΤΟ και ΜΗ ΑΣΦΑΛΕΣ(!) Κράτος) και αποτέλεσε έναν(!) από τους αρκετούς και σοβαρούς λόγους της σύγκρουσης (δυστυχώς), Η.Π.Α. – Ισραήλ και κατ’ ουσίαν Ομπάμα – Νετανιάχου!
– Άρα μπορείτε να αντιληφθείτε εύκολα, πού “ανήκαν” και από ποιούς, πιθανώς,… “υποστηρίζονταν”, (πέραν του Ατλαντικού εννοώ, καταλάβατε), όλοι αυτοί οι “αναλυτές”, καθηγητές Παν-μίων και άλλοι, που στις “αναλύσεις” τους, σε ε/φ, περιοδικά, τηλεοράσεις και ραδιόφωνα, έγραφαν και μιλούσαν, για αγωγούς μέσα από την Τουρκία, κλπ, αλλά και πού ανήκαν και πού ανήκουν όσοι υπόλοιποι / όσοι άλλοι προέβαλαν συνεχώς, όπως το καθημερινό”ΠΑΤΕΡ ΗΜΩΝ”, τα όσα περί οριοθέτησης της ελληνικής ΑΟΖ ακούγατε, κλπ! (Ένας της κατηγορίας αυτής φίλοι μου μάλιστα, έπαιζε σκάκι από… 3 χρονών, κατά δήλωσή του! Αχαχαχαχαχαχα)!..
– ΣΥΜΠΕΡΑΣΜΑ σε ό,τι αφορά την Χώρα μας και μόνον; (Διότι ευρύτερα, τα συμπεράσματα είναι ασφαλώς πολλά)!
Για άλλη μια φορά και στο τόσο σημαντικό αυτό Πεδίο της Ενέργειας, που σχετίζεται ΑΜΕΣΑ με την “ΕΘΝΙΚΗ μας ΑΜΥΝΑ” (και αν αφήσει ο ΘΕΟΣ “θα το φάνε” οι “Διεθνείς Εβραίοι” με το… ΥΠΕΡΤΑΜΕΙΟ και τα… 99 χρόνια ΔΟΥΛΕΙΑΣ και ΤΥΡΑΝΝΙΑΣ στους ξένους, που μας πούλησαν εύκολα ο Κος ΤΣΙΠΡΑΣ και ο Κος ΚΑΜΜΕΝΟΣ), φάνηκε η ύπαρξη στρατολογημένων από ξένους “Ελλήνων”, που μάχονταν / μάχονται για την επικράτηση των αφεντικών τους, στη γη μας και γη τους!
Ναι φίλοι μου, είναι έτσι ακριβώς και ξέρετε γιατί; Διότι εθνικά σχέδια, σαν το παραπάνω ας πούμε, [δείτε και πάλι τον Χάρτη παραπάνω και αντιληφθείτε το γιατί σας έχω αναλύσει εδώ, στον “ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΘΡΥΛΟ“, πολλές φορές κατά το παρελθόν, τί σημαίνει πχ 25ος Μεσημβρινός, γιατί η Τανζού ΤΣΙΛΕΡ ζητούσε υφαλοκρηπίδα στο Ιόνιο, από τη 10ετία του 1990 ακόμα, γιατί Τούρκος Αξκός στη Νάπολι, κάποτε -θα το θυμάστε, επί Μ. ΕΒΕΡΤ (και… Ανζάκα, αχαχαχαχα), νομίζω Αρχηγού της ΝΔ, που ήταν τότε Αξκη Αντιπολίτευση- μετέτρεψε σχεδιαστικά τη Γαύδο σε τουρκική, κλπ, γιατί τώρα “ξύπνησε” πχ το “ανθρωπιστικόν” (sic) του χαρακτήρος του Γενίτσαρου ΡΑΜΑ, γιατί ο ΡΤΕ μας ανακοίνωσε “τα σύνορα της καρδιάς του”, που έγιναν αιτία να φανούν… “τα σύνορα της… μαλακίας” πολλών εκ των Ελλήνων που κατευθύνουν ή και φιλοδοξούν να κατευθύνουν, αν δεν ποδηγετήσουν τη ζωή μας φίλοι μου, και άλλα πολλά / να μας μελετάτε εδώ], τα όποια εθνικά σχέδια λοιπόν ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΕΞΥΦΑΙΝΟΝΤΑΙ ΜΥΣΤΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΚΡΥΦΑ ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΠΡΟΩΘΟΥΝΤΑΙ… “ΚΑΤΑΛΛΗΛΑ“*, αν με… “πιάνετε” αγαπητοί!
* Το “ΚΑΤΑΛΛΗΛΑ“ περιλαμβάνει… 1000 πράγματα, ανάλογα με την “Κεντρική Ιδέα“, του κάθε φορά σχεδίου!..
– Αρκούν αυτά φίλοι μου, για το υπόψη θέμα!
– Α! Κα Μπακογιάννη μου, που με ξεχάσατε, όπως και ο συμπαθής νεαρός και φέρελπις(;) βοηθός σας… “Αχιλλέας”! Πολύ σωστά το είπατε! Ο ΡΤΕ θα ήθελε(!) πράγματι να γίνει ο ΚΕΜΑΛ των ΙΣΛΑΜΙΣΤΩΝ, ένα ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΟ του ΙΣΟΔΥΝΑΜΟ! (Ιστορικά ο Κεμάλ δεν θα αποκαθηλωθεί ποτέ από τους Τούρκους)!
Προσέξτε όμως παρακάτω!
Ο ΡΤΕ τώρα πια και όλες οι περί αυτόν… σουπιές, ΔΙΕΞΑΓΟΥΝ “ΑΓΩΝΑ ΕΠΙΒΙΩΣΗΣ”! “Το τουρκικό… ΘΗΡΙΟ ξεψυχά” σεβαστή Κα Μπακογιάννη, όπως εδώ και εξ αρχής του σάϊτ μας είχε γράψει ο “ΑΡΧΑΓΓΕΛΟΣ“! Οι ΤΕΔ, ο “Καραγκιοζάκος” μου ο Α/ΓΕΕΔ Στρατηγός Χουλουσί Ακάρ, που της εκπροσωπεί συνταγματικά στην παρούσα φάση, η ΜΙΤ και ο αγαπητός Διοικητής της Χακάν, το ΥΠΕΞ, η ΔΙΚΑΙΟΣΥΝΗ, όλο αυτό που εύστοχα ο συγχωρεμένος Καθηγητής μου Νεοκλής ΣΑΡΡΗΣ, αποκαλούσε “ΣΤΡΑΤΟΓΡΑΦΕΙΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ”, το βαθύ κυβερνών τ/κράτος γενικά, για να μην σας κουράζω, ξέρει ότι “πνέει τα λοίσθια” και γι’ αυτό είναι και ΑΚΡΩΣ ΕΠΙΚΙΝΔΥΝΟ! (Δεν θα σας γράψω τώρα για τις αναλαμπές των… μελλοθανάτων, προ του τέλους των και άλλα σχετικά, με καταλάβατε είμαι σίγουρος)!..
– Πάντως, οφείλω να ομολογήσω μετά παρρησίας, ότι οι όποιες μέχρι τώρα παρεμβάσεις σας, ως άκρως σημαίνοντος πολιτικού προσώπου της Χώρας μας, “στα εθνικά μας”, είναι μακράν οι ορθότερες και “επιπέδου”, διότι έχω ακούσει “μύριες όσες” παπαρολογίες, με το συμπάθιο!
– Επίσης, επειδή αξία έχει η αλήθεια και όχι η… λειχία, δεν σας κρύβω ότι απόρησα με την απόφαση του Αρχηγού της ΝΔ, να σας τοποθετήσει στην “Ανάπτυξη”! (Όχι ότι και εκεί δεν θα πετύχετε και ας είναι και εκεί ένας λάκκος με ιοβόλα φίδια)! Δεν σημαίνει ότι επειδή υποστηρίζατε την Κλίντον και αυτή έχασε, δεν θα τα πηγαίνατε ως ΥΠΕΞ, εξ ίσου άριστα και με τους ΤΡΑΜΠ-ικούς! (Εδώ σημειώστε παρακαλώ και ας μου επιτρέψετε την οίηση, ότι, αν με διαβάζατε, θα ήσασταν τουλάχιστον ΕΠΙΦΥΛΑΚΤΙΚΗ (!) στις όποιες εκτιμήσεις σας για τις διεξαχθείσες προσφάτως αμερικανικές εκλογές)!
– Και ρωτάω αμέσως!
– Ποιός στο Κόμμα σας, αλλά και όχι μόνον, ξέρει καλύτερα από εσάς τα “εθνικά” μας; Απαντώ “Κανείς”! Άρα Κα Μπακογιάννη είμαι “ελεύθερος” να σκεφτώ ό,τι θελω και μάλιστα πολλά, για την απόφαση αυτή του αδελφού και Αρχηγού σας!.. (Το “νέον” στην Πολιτική, αν υποθέσουμε ότι πρόκειται για… ανανέωση παντού από τον Αρχηγό σας, δεν είναι “ηλικιακό”, αλλά είναι -πιθανώς- “και ηλικιακό”, κυρίως είναι… “εγκεφαλικό“, αν δεχθούμε φυσικά ότι ο Κ.Κ.Μ. ήθελε την ανανέωση και στην εξωτερική πολιτική, σ’ έναν τομέα που απαιτεί βαθιά Πατριώτες και πολυ-έμπειρους / πολυσχιδείς και άλλα πολλά, όπως εκτιμώ, διπλωμάτες πολιτικούς)!..
2. ΑΠΟΚΑΛΥΨΗ – «ΒΟΜΒΑ»! ΑΥΤΗ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΛΙΣΤΑ ΜΕ ΤΑ ΠΟΥΛΗΜΕΝΑ ΜΜΕ… (ΦΩΤΟ ΝΤΟΚΟΥΜΕΝΤΟ)
Το πρώην μέλος του Κογκρέσου, Ρον Πωλ αποκάλυψε τη λίστα με τους δημοσιογράφους και τα μέσα, στα οποία δουλεύουν τα οποία μετέδιδαν ψευδείς ειδήσεις και ψέμματα υπέρ της Χίλαρι Κλίντον.
Μέσα στη λίστα περιλαμβάνονται πασίγνωστα μέσα ενημέρωσης όπως, το CNN, New York Times και ο Guardian (η… “ESPRESSO”της Αγγλίας).
Η λίστα βασίζεται και σε αποκαλύψεις από τα WikiLeaks και σε έρευνα του ιδίου για τη στάση που τήρησαν προεκλογικά.
Χαρακτηριστικά ανέφερε πως «είναι τα ίδια ΜΜΕ που έδιναν 98% πιθανότητες νίκης στη Χίλαρι, είναι τα ίδια ΜΜΕ που μας έλεγαν ότι η οικονομία βρίσκεται σε εξαιρετική κατάσταση».
Ο Τραμπ ΞΕΦΤΙΛΙΣΕ «τετ-α-τετ» τα συστημικά Αμερικανικά ΜΜΕ! Έβρισε τον επικεφαλής του CNN: «Είστε ψεύτες και ανέντιμοι» – «Θα πρέπει να ΝΤΡΕΠΕΣΤΕ»! – Όπου φύγει… φύγει τα ΛΑΜΟΓΙΑ!..
ΠΑΤΕ ΣΤΟ ΣΑΪΤ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΥ ΧΙΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΑΒΑΣΤΕ ΤΑ ΟΝΟΜΑΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΙΣ ΔΝΣΕΙΣ…
* Κε Χίε! Πρόσεξε! Σε “πλεύρισαν” τελευταίως και τους “έδωσες βήμα” άκρως επικίνδυνα άτομα!..
3. SOROS & DEMOCRACY ALLIANCE BILLIONAIRES HEADED FOR YOUR LOCAL COMMUNITY
How Democrat mega-donors plan to retake power for the Left.
November 18, 2016
While Hollywood celebrities, professional athletes, tenured professors, and fainthearted college students nationwide continue to react to Donald Trump’s presidential election with anger, bewilderment, bouts of weeping, and illiterate tweets, the core leaders of the political Left are already busy planning how they will seek to deligitimize and destroy Trump’s presidency before it even gets off the ground.
The first major effort in that direction occurred this week in Washington’s luxurious Mandarin Oriental Hotel, where a group of super-wealthy leftist funders known as the Democracy Alliance sponsored a three-day, closed-door meeting attended by the multi-billionaire George Soros, the leaders of many left-wing activist groups and labor unions, and Congressional luminaries like Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren, and Keith Ellison. Over the past decade, the Democracy Alliance has given at least $500 million to pro-Democrat and leftist causes. High on the list of priorities at its Washington conference was a discussion of how to derail Trump’s “100-day plan,” which the Alliance characterizes as “a terrifying assault on President Obama’s achievements — and our progressive vision for an equitable and just nation.”
In a recent email to his allies and donors, Democracy Alliance president Gara LaMarche offered a clear indication of where the Democrats plan to direct their attention and resources over the next few years. Specifically, he said that this week’s conference would focus on assessing “what steps we will take together to … take back power, beginning in the states in 2017 and 2018.” Raj Goyle, a Democratic activist who is also involved with the Democracy Alliance, concurred that “progressive donors and organizations need to immediately correct the lack of investment in state and local strategies.”
Let that sink in: State and local … State and local … State and local.
This strategy of focusing on state and local politics dovetails seamlessly with the monumentally significant, recent announcement that former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder will be chairing the newly formed National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC), which was developed in close consultation with the Obama White House. NDRC’s mission will be to: (a) help Democrats take control of the political offices that decide how state legislative and congressional districts are configured, and (b) configure them in a way that will maximize Democratic power in the U.S. House of Representatives as well as in statehouses across the country.
In almost every U.S. state, the state legislature determines precisely where the boundary lines for each congressional and state legislative district should be situated, and the resulting maps are then either approved or vetoed by the governor. This process occurs every ten years, after the U.S. Census has been taken. Obviously, a political party has a great advantage if, at that juncture in time, it has control of a state legislature, a governorship, or both. Republicans currently control 68 out of 99 state legislative chambers, and 31 out of 50 governorships.
To address this imbalance, NDRC aims to promote the election of Democrats as state lawmakers and governors by means of highly aggressive get-out-the-vote efforts, advertising campaigns, ballot initiatives, and legal challenges to state redistricting maps. The overriding goal is to ensure that those Democrats will be in office when it is time to draw up and approve new district maps after the 2020 Census. And to help the Democrats draw those maps in a manner that favors their party, NDRC will carefully analyze the demographic makeup of every neighborhood, every street, and every city block, in order to ascertain precisely how many Democrats and Republicans, respectively, reside in each proposed district. In states where Democrats are in political control, they will be able — with the aid of the demographic data supplied by NDRC — to tweak and bend the boundary lines of their districts however they wish, so as to create as many majority-Democrat districts as possible.
Of course, to accomplish all this, NDRC will need lots of money. And that’s where the Democracy Alliance and George Soros come in. They’ve got billions of dollars at their disposal. And they can give as much as they want to NDRC, because the organization is incorporated as a tax-exempt “Section 527 Committee” — a term referring to the section of the IRS tax code that governs such entities. As Open Secrets.org explains: “These groups are typically … organized for the purpose of influencing an issue, policy, appointment or election … [and] can raise unlimited funds from individuals, corporations or labor unions, but they must register with the IRS and disclose their contributions and expenditures.”
Unlimited funds. George Soros. Democracy Alliance. Corporate and union donors. A multi-partner marriage of political radicals, made in heaven. And the presence of Democrat patron saints like Eric Holder and Barack Obama — the latter of whom has already stated that the advancement of NDRC’s agenda will become the main focus of his own post-presidential activities — will undoubtedly help to convince many leftist millionaires and billionaires that it is worth their while to dump the contents of their wallets into the project.
The Democratic Party may be in turmoil for the moment, but its leaders and funders have never been more driven to increase their political power than they are right now.
4. OBAMA PLANS TO RULE AMERICA OUTSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE
…and he might get away with it.
November 25, 2016
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
Barack Obama has two faces. After Trump’s victory and Hillary’s defeat, the public Obama has been gracious and diplomatic. His lectures to Trump, directly and indirectly, are couched in praise. He echoed the feeling of millions on both sides when he said, “We are now all rooting for his success”.
That’s a lie. Or rather a disguise.
Obama and his aides had, in one insider narrative, decided to don the “mask of decorum”. The contempt for Trump still seeps through the mask. And the mask hides Obama’s next big move.
President Obama is over. He knows that. There are still some things that he can do before he leaves office, but everything except the most destructive, can be undone by his successor. The next phase of his campaign will not be fought from the White House. It will be fought against the White House .
The other Obama is emerging in conference calls with his supporters. “One of the challenges that I’ve discovered being president is I’d like to be organizer-in-chief, but it’s hard,” he said in one call.
Obama can no longer be commander-in-chief. Instead he’s plotting to become organizer-in-chief.
The infrastructure for the organization was put into place long before anyone thought that Hillary might lose. Organizing for Action gave him his own organizing hub. If Hillary had won, it would have been a pressure group. Now that Trump won, it’s an axis to build a personal counterrevolution around.
In his post-election conference call with his OFA troops, Obama told them, “I’m giving you like a week and a half to get over it”. Then it would be time to “move forward not only to protect what we’ve accomplished, but also to see this as an opportunity”. What opportunity could there be in Trump’s win?
Obama is now the only major national figure still standing among the Democrats. After Hillary’s defeat, he’s worked hard to attribute the loss to her shortcomings, not his policies and decisions. That’s not just to soothe his ego. If he’s going to dictate the future of his party, he can’t afford to be blamed for its latest disaster. And Obama is still determined to dictate the future of the party and the country.
In conventional politics, Obama is done. There’s no way back into the White House. And Hillary’s fate won’t leave much enthusiasm for nominating the uncharismatic spouse of a charismatic ex-president.
But Obama is not a conventional politician. He’s an organizer and a campaigner at the vanguard of a radical movement that seeks to control traditional institutions, but doesn’t feel bound by them. Unlike Bill Clinton, his plans don’t begin and end with the White House. As an organizer, Obama is equipped to build bases of power outside traditional institutions. And that is exactly what he is doing.
The demoralization of the Democrats is, as Obama put it, an opportunity. Social chaos is a time for the left to overthrow and undermine traditional institutions. Fear, anger and despair are radicalizing. The left has always operated by throwing bombs and then profiting from the fallout. That’s Obama’s agenda. Having wrecked the country and the Democrats, he sees that not as a setback, but as an opportunity.
“The network that you represent, you’re perfectly poised to do that,” Obama told his OFAers. “In other words, now is the time for some organizing.”
While the leftist rioters in the streets are garnering the most attention, the real threat comes from the network of staffers dubbed Obama Anonymous which are beginning to organize and coordinate. OFA is Obama’s equivalent of the Clinton Foundation. The Clintons built Clintonworld around staffers, but its goal was harvesting money. Obama Inc. is being built around organizing and activism. Like Clintonworld, it will be a network encompassing a variety of political and non-profit institutions. Unlike them, it will be much less focused on directing money to its bosses in preparation for an election. Instead it will function like a traditional leftist movement, merging influence operations with crowdsourced mobilization.
OFA will be far more dangerous in the wild than the Clinton Foundation ever was. The Clintons hoped to ride back to power on a giant wave of money. Obama is taking a much more radical course.
The staffers exiting government are being wired into Obama Inc. whether or not they take jobs directly working for him. The OFA alumni are building networks across organizations while taking their marching orders from him. They expect Obama to lead them back from the wilderness and into the halls of power.
He’s told them so.
“I’m going to be constrained in what I do with all of you until I am again a private citizen. But that’s not so far off,” he assured them. “I’m still fired up and I’m still ready to go.” His next comments promised that radical political change could and would take place.
Obama isn’t going to retire. He’s not going to spend years puttering around with a presidential library. He’s not even going to set up a Clintonesque slush fund and try to make his wife president. Instead he wants to force radical change from outside the White House by using the network he’s built.
While the public Obama wraps up business at the White House, concludes yet another world tour, alternating between praising Trump and offering him condescending advice, the other Obama is preparing to deploy a network that will dominate the Dems and set the agenda on the left.
If Obama succeeds, then he will get another shot at picking his White House successor. But beyond that, he’s been handed the keys to an organizing machine that will allow him to set even more of the agenda for his party than ever before. And he has a cause that is sending the party reeling back into his arms.
Obama believes that he can rule America from outside the White House. And he might be right.
Political norms and old rules have been falling faster than leaves in an autumn wind. If Obama sets out to move the center of power outside the White House and into an organization that will control national politics through the left, it would be dangerous to assume that he can’t and won’t succeed.
The Democrats didn’t respond to their defeat, one of a sequence, by trying to move to the center. Instead there is every sign that they are moving further to the left. Keith Ellison, a radical leftist with an anti-Semitic past, is tipped to head the DNC. Schumer still has the Senate, but Elizabeth Warren may have it before too long. Combine that with Obama as the president-in-exile and the Dems will be more radical and extremist than they were even when Obama was sitting in the White House.
The Democrats are ceasing to be a national party. Instead they are becoming a nationalizing party. They are losing their presence in much of the country, from state legislature to state legislature, and becoming the party of major cities and the national government. Their agenda is to move power from local areas to central ones, from the villages and the suburbs to the cities, from states to D.C. and from locally elected legislators in D.C. to the satellite bureaucracies of the Federal government.
Obama sees Hillary’s defeat as an opportunity to burn the Dem’s last bridges with the larger country and its “bitter clingers”, to double down on nationalizing power and to define the political narrative around the agendas of urban elites. The left crippled the Democrats. Now it wants to utterly consume them.
Barack Obama is still being vague and coy about his plans. He informs reporters that he will attack Trump when it comes to “core questions about our values and ideals”. But the “faithful” are getting much clearer signals. “You’re going to see me early next year, and we’re going to be in a position where we can start cooking up all kinds of great stuff to do.”
The election was a catastrophic disaster for the Democrats, but it opened all sorts of doors for Obama.
Hillary’s defeat removes the Clintons, his only real internal rivals, off the stage. Trump’s triumph in working class areas cuts more ties with the traditional Dem base and transforms it into a party of left-wing urban elites and their radical agendas. And the popular figures on the left, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Keith Ellison, lack his national stature, speaking skills and organization.
Obama will move to consolidate the left. And then the Democrats. He will function as a president-in-exile heading up the opposition to Trump. When it comes to verbally challenging Trump, Obama will be more likely to be interviewed and heard than Ellison or Schumer. And his people will coordinate responses across the left from street level organizing to think tanks and policy moves.
Some of it is ego.
Obama believes that he can find the key to beating Trump in the traditional tactics of the left. But most is ideology and power. Obama is not done transforming America. And America isn’t done with him yet.
5. ΣΟΚΑΡΙΣΤΙΚΟ! Η Απόρρητη Έκθεση της Μοσάντ από ιδιωτική συνομιλία του Χένρυ Κίσινγκερ…
Διαβάστε και φρίξτε. Ο μεγάλος αυτός εχθρός του Ελληνισμού και της ανθρωπότητος φέρεται να είχε σχεδιάσει αυτό που ζούμε σήμερα στην Πατρίδα μας, αλλά και στην ευρύτερη περιοχή της Μέσης Ανατολής.
Να εύχεστε αυτός ο άρχοντας του σιωνισμού να ζει, όταν η Πατρίδα μας θα Ανασταίνεται για να δει με τα ίδια του τα μάτια τα σκοτεινά όνειρά του να γκρεμίζονται. Αμήν!
Απόρρητη έκθεση της “Μοσάντ” από ιδιωτική συνομιλία του Χένρυ Κίσινγκερ σε εκπροσώπους της, γερμανικών εβραϊκών συναγωγών, κατά την επίσημη επίσκεψη του στη Γερμανία (1983)
Μετάφραση από το αγγλικό κείμενο (το πρωτότυπο ακολουθεί).
“Στις αρχές του 21ου αιώνα το Ισραήλ πρέπει να ελέγχει όλα τα ενεργειακά κοιτάσματα της Αν. Μεσογείου. Από τους συνδικαιούχους μόνο με την Τουρκία πρέπει να διαπραγματευτεί και στην ανάγκη να παραχωρήσει ένα μέρος. Οι Αραβικές χώρες της Μέσης Ανατολής θα είναι απασχολημένες σε εμφύλιες συρράξεις. Η Ελλάδα και η Κύπρος θα μαστίζονται από δρομολογημένη οικονομική κρίση. Η μόνη παρηγοριά για τους Ελληνες ίσως να είναι η δικαίωση τους για την αποπληρωμή των Γερμανικών αποζημιώσεων από το β΄ παγκόσμιο πόλεμο. Σε αυτή τη δικαστική διεκδίκηση τους πρέπει να τους στηρίξουμε, για να τρωθεί η οικονομική επανάκαμψη και το γόητρο της, πάντοτε επικίνδυνης για μας, Γερμανίας”
Απόρρητη έκθεση της Μοσαντ από ιδιωτική συνομιλία του Χένρυ Κισινγκερ σε εκπροσώπους της, γερμανικών εβραϊκών συναγωγών, κατά την επίσημη επίσκεψη του στη Γερμανία (1983)
το πρωτότυπο κείμενο
At the beginning of the 21st century, Israel must succeed in the integral control of the energy deposits, which exist in the maritime area of the East Mediterranean. Concerning the future exploiters, Israel should negotiate only with Turkey and, if circumstances make it necessary, yield to Turkey parts of the deposits. Arab nations in the Middle East will be locked on the vicious circle of civil wars. Greece and Cyprus, will be confronted with directed economic crisis. The only consolation for the Greek people might be receiving the long over due WWII German compensations. In this demanding judiciary struggle, Greece deserve our full support, in order to make vulnerable the ever dangerous for us German prestige, and its economic, future reconstruction.
(CONFIDENTIAL ESSAY, GERMANY, 1983)
6. AYTEΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΟΙ 10 ΜΕΓΑ-ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥΝ ΟΛΗ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΑ ΑΓΟΡΑ! ΔΕΙΤΕ ΓΙΑ ΠΟΙΟΥΣ ΔΟΥΛΕΥΕΙ ΟΛΟΣ Ο ΠΛΑΝΗΤΗΣ!
Αυτές οι παντοδύναμες εταιρείες κυριαρχούν στην παγκόσμια αγορά. Το εισόδημα της πιο εύρωστης οικονομικά από αυτές υπερβαίνει τα 80 δισεκατομμύρια δολάρια το χρόνο.
Οι περισσότερες μεγάλες μάρκες των τροφίμων, των προϊόντων οικιακής χρήσης, των καλλυντικών και των προϊόντων για τα ζώα ελέγχονται μόνο από 10 μεγάλες εταιρείες. Η Oxfam, μια διεθνής συνομοσπονδία των ΜΚΟ, δημιούργησε ένα γράφημα που δείχνει την κυριαρχία των εταιρειών αυτών στην παγκόσμια αγορά και το πόσο σέβεται η κάθε μία το περιβάλλον ή τα δικαιώματα των εργαζομένων.
Έσοδα το 2015: 13.500 εκατ.
Έδρα: Battle Creek, Μίσιγκαν (ΗΠΑ).
Η πολυεθνική ηγέτις στην παραγωγή των προϊόντων για πρωινό, όπως τα δημητριακά και τα μπισκότα, έχει πλέον εισέλθει και στην αγορά των σνακ. Μεταξύ των γνωστότερων προϊόντων της, περιλαμβάνονται τα εμπορικά σήματα των Corn Flakes, All-Bran ή Pringles, που αποκτήθηκαν το 2012.
- Associated British Foods
Έσοδα το 2015: 16.600 εκατ.
Έδρα: Λονδίνο, Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο.
Η εταιρεία ασχολείται με την παραγωγή ζάχαρης, μαγιάς μπύρας και διαφόρων συστατικών των τροφίμων. Μεταξύ των εμπορικών της σημάτων περιλαμβάνονται τα Δημητριακά Dorset και τα τσάγια Twinings. Επίσης ελέγχει την αλυσίδα καταστημάτων Primark ρούχων και αξεσουάρ.
- General Mills
Έσοδα το 2015: 17.600 εκατ.
Τόπος: Golden Valley, Μινεσότα (ΗΠΑ).
Η επιχείρηση γίγαντας περιλαμβάνει αρκετές εταιρείες που παράγουν γιαούρτι, παγωτό ή κατεψυγμένη ζύμη. πιο δημοφιλή εμπορικά σήματα της είναι τα Cheerios, Χρυσή Grahams, Yoplait, Haagen-Dazs και το Old El PasoΠαλιά Ελ Πάσο, μεταξύ άλλων.
Έσοδα το 2015: 24.900 εκατ.
Κεντρικά Γραφεία: Παρίσι, Γαλλία.
Η γαλλική πολυεθνική είναι ένας από τους μεγαλύτερους παραγωγούς παιδικών τροφών, γαλακτοκομικών προϊόντων και εμφιαλωμένου νερού. Πωλεί μάρκες, όπως η Danone γιαούρτια (στις ΗΠΑ ονομάζεται Dannon), Activia, Actimel και Evian μεταλλικό νερό.
Έσοδα το 2015: 29.600 εκατ.
Έδρα: Deerfield, Ιλινόις (ΗΠΑ).
Η εν λόγω εταιρεία δραστηριοποιείται κυρίως στην παραγωγή ζαχαρωδών προϊόντων, τροφίμων και ποτών. Πιο γνωστές μάρκες της είναι Oreo, Milka, η Trident, Halls, Cadbury και Toblerone.
Έσοδα το 2015: 33.000 εκατ.
Έδρα: McLean, Βιρτζίνια (ΗΠΑ).
Η ετερογενών δραστηριοτήτων παράγει ένα μεγάλο αριθμό από μάρκες ειδών ζαχαροπλαστικής καθώς και προϊόντα για κατοικίδια. Αυτές περιλαμβάνουν τις Mars, Snickers, Twix, Bounty, M & M , Uncle Ben’s, Orbit, Pedigree και Whiskas.
Έσοδα το 2015: 44,300 εκατ.
Έδρα: Ατλάντα (ΗΠΑ).
Αυτός ο γίγαντας των αναψυκτικών παράγει ένα μεγάλο αριθμό παγκοσμίως γνωστών μαρκών, όπως η Coca-Cola, η Sprite, η Fanta ή το Nestea.
Έσοδα το 2015: 59.100 εκατ.
Έδρα: Λονδίνο (Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο) και το Ρότερνταμ (Κάτω Χώρες).
Η βρετανο-ολλανδική πολυεθνική ασχολείται αποκλειστικά με την παραγωγή τροφίμων, όπως Knorr και Ben & Jerry και τα προϊόντα προσωπικής υγιεινής, όπως Dove, Rexona και Axe.
Έσοδα το 2015: 63.000 εκατ.
Έδρα: Νέα Υόρκη (ΗΠΑ).
Αυτή η πολυεθνική εταιρεία εξειδικεύεται στην παραγωγή ποτών και σνακ. Μεταξύ των πιο δημοφιλών ετικετών της περιλαμβάνονται οι Pepsi, 7up, Mirinda, Doritos, Lay ή Cheetos, μεταξύ άλλων.
Έσοδα το 2015: 87 δισεκατομμύρια δολάρια.
Έδρα: Vevey, Ελβετία.
Η ελβετική εταιρεία περιλαμβάνει εταιρείες που παράγουν σοκολάτες, γαλακτοκομικά, τροφές για ζώα συντροφιάς και εμφιαλωμένο νερό. Nescafe, Nesquik, Maggi, KitKat, Garnier, Purina είναι μερικές από τις πιο γνωστές μάρκες της.
7. FIDEL CASTRO: THE LIFE & DEATH OF A MONSTER
A look at the political career of one of history’s most brutal tyrants.
November 30, 2016
The third of six children, Fidel Alejandro Castro Ruz was born on August 13, 1926 (although some sources claim that he was born a year later), in Cuba’s eastern province of Oriente. His father, Angel, was a wealthy sugar plantation owner originally from Spain.
Raised in affluence while surrounded by poverty, Fidel Castro was educated in private Jesuit boarding schools. He attended El Colegio de Belen and pitched for the school’s baseball team. After graduating in 1945, Castro entered law school at the University of Havana and immersed himself in the political climate of Cuban nationalism, anti-imperialism, and socialism.
In 1947 Castro participated in a (failed) effort to overthrow the dictator Rafael Trujillo in the Dominican Republic. He then returned to the University of Havana and joined the Partido Ortodoxo, an anti-communist political party whose stated priorities were nationalism, economic independence, and social reforms. Its founder, Cuban presidential candidate Eduardo Chibas, lost the 1948 election but became a hero of sorts to Castro.
In 1948 Castro married Mirta Diaz Balart, who hailed from a wealthy Cuban family. The couple had one child, Fidelito, before the marriage was dissolved in 1955.
In 1952 Castro ran as a candidate for a seat in the Cuban parliament, but a coup led by the country’s former president, General Fulgencio Batista, overthrew the existing government and cancelled the election. Solidifying his power with Cuba’s military and economic elite, Batista established himself as a dictator. Castro collaborated with fellow members of the Partido Ortodoxo to organize an insurrection which they launched on July 26, 1953. The attack failed and Castro was captured and sentenced to 15 years in prison.
After being set free in 1955 under an amnesty deal with the Batista government, Castro traveled to Mexico, where he met Ernesto “Che” Guevara. Guevara became an important confidante and advisor to Castro, and the pair conspired to overthrow the Batista regime by means of guerrilla warfare.
On December 2, 1956, Castro and 81 fellow insurgents returned to Cuba, near the eastern city of Manzanillo, to begin their protracted guerrilla campaign. Castro organized resistance groups in cities and towns across the country. By January 1959, he had forced the Batista government to collapse. Batista fled to the Dominican Republic, and a 32-year-old Fidel Castro seized control of Cuba.
Fidel Castro entered Havana on January 8, 1959, to wild acclaim from all quarters. Most Cubans were jubilant; Castro was promising an end to the corrupt governments that had plagued Cuba since independence. Far from any Communism, Castro was promising a revolution “as green as Cuba’s palm trees!” with national elections in three months. Private property would be secure, a free press guaranteed, friendly relations with the U.S. were essential.
“Fidel esta es tu casa!” read impromptu signs that were springing up across the front of thousands of Cuban homes, including mansions, humble country shacks and everything in between.
The New York Times had been singing Castro’s praises since the first interview with him as a rebel in February 1957. By now most of the international press had joined the cheerleading. Jack Paar never treated a guest on his Tonight Show as deferentially as he treated honored guest Fidel Castro. Ed Sullivan hailed Castro as “Cuba’s George Washington.” Retired president Harry Truman called Castro a “good young man trying to do what’s best for Cuba. We should extend him a hand.” The U.S. actually accorded diplomatic recognition to Castro’s government more quickly than it had recognized Batista’s in 1952. In fact, the promptness of this U.S. recognition set a record for recognition of a Latin American government. Usually the process took weeks; for Castro, it took mere days.
Yet within three months of his entry into Havana, Castro’s firing squads had murdered an estimated 600 to 1,100 men and boys, and Cuba’s jails held ten times the number of political prisoners as under Fulgencio Batista, whom Castro overthrew with claims to “liberating” Cuba.
Barely a year in power, Castro was referring to the U.S. as “a vulture preying on humanity!” And most of Cuba’s newspapers and TV stations (Cuba had more TVs per capita at the time than Germany, Canada or France) were under government control, to better serve “the people.” Six months later he confiscated all U.S. properties on the island; 5,911 businesses worth $2 billion, along with most property and businesses owned by Cubans.
On January 3, 1961, outgoing President Eisenhower finally declared, “there’s a limit to what the United States in self-respect can endure. That limit has been reached.” He broke diplomatic relations with Cuba. During the Bay of Pigs invasion in April 1961, Castro finally declared his revolution “Socialist,” and in December of that year he pronounced himself “a lifelong Marxist-Leninist!” Cuba was now officially Communist.
They say you can boil a live frog in a pot by gradually turning up the heat. He will not jump out, because he can’t tell the temperature’s changing. Something like this happened to Cuba. Castro’s Revolution was a stealth revolution, done in stages, dividing and conquering till he had the whole prize. “First they came for the Batistianos and I didn’t protest because I had no connections with Batista’s government. Then they came for the big landowners and I didn’t protest because I didn’t have a Sugar mill; I had a small tobacco farm. Then they came for the big businessmen and I didn’t protest because I was a small shopkeeper not a factory owner. Finally they came for me…” and, well, we’ve heard this song before.
Large landholdings were initially “nationalized” on the pretext of “land reform” where the massive latifundia would be parceled out to landless peasants. A New York Times editorial hailed the confiscations: “This promise of social justice brought a foretaste of human dignity for millions who had little knowledge of it in Cuba’s former near-feudal economy.”
As with so much else regarding pre-Castro Cuba, major misconceptions abound in this editorial. To wit: in the 1950s the average farm-wage in “near-feudal” Cuba was higher than in France, Belgium, Denmark, or West Germany. According to the Geneva-based International Labor Organization, the average daily wage for an agricultural worker in Cuba in 1958 was $3. The average daily wage in France at the time was $2.73; in Belgium $2.70; in Denmark $2.74; in West Germany $2.73; and in the U.S. $4.06. Also, far from huge latifundia dominating the agricultural landscape, the average Cuban farm in 1958 was actually smaller than the average farm in the U.S.: 140 acres in Cuba vs. 195 acres in the U.S. In 1958, Cuba, a nation of 6.2 million people, had 159,958 farms — 11,000 of which were tobacco farms. Only 34 percent of the Cuban population was rural.
Confiscated farms remained in Cuban government hands as state farms on the Soviet model. By early 1959, Soviet advisers from the Ukraine were already directing Castro’s Institute of Agrarian Reform. As the pattern became clear, a major rebellion broke out in the Cuban countryside. According to Raul Castro (Castro’s brother and the head of Cuba’s military), the rebellion involved 179 different “counterrevolutionary bands.” This guerrilla war lasted from 1960 to 1966. It took the Castroites 6 years, tens of thousands of troops, scores of Russian advisors, squadrons of Soviet tanks, helicopters, flame throwers, and a massive and brutal “re-location” campaign where thousands of rural families were uprooted at gunpoint and relocated to concentration camps at the very western tip of Cuba, to finally crush the rebellion.
“Cuban military units commanded by Russian officers employed flame-throwers to burn hundreds of rural palm-thatched cottages,” reads one account of the rebellion. One individual who was fortunate enough to escape to Miami recalls that “[w]e fought with the fury of cornered beasts” against the occupation of Cuba that the Soviet Union carried out through its proxies, Castro and Guevara. The Kennedy-Khrushchev pact that ended the Cuban Missile Crisis completely starved the rebels of even the meager supplies they had received by airdrop in 1961.
Two years into his revolution, Castro managed to turn Cuba’s traditional immigration pattern on its head. Prior to 1959 Cuba experienced net immigration. In fact — as a percentage of population — Cuba took in more immigrants in the 20th century than the U.S. took in — and this includes the Ellis Island years. In 1958 the Cuban embassy in Rome had a backlog of 12,000 applications for immigrant visas from Italians clamoring to immigrate to Cuba. From 1903-1950 Cuba took in over one million Spanish immigrants. (notice: pre-Castro Cuba’s wetbacks came from the first-world.) Also, before Castro, more Americans lived in Cuba, than Cubans in the U.S. Back then, people were as desperate to enter Cuba as they are now to escape. Come Castro and half-starved Haitians (a short 60 miles away) turn up their nose at Cuba.
By 1992 two million Cubans had fled Cuba, most against staggering odds and with only the clothes on their back. By most estimates this is a tiny fraction of those who desired to leave. A causeway from Havana to Key West in 1961 with the same free travel as existed in Cuba (indeed, in all civilized countries) in 1958 would have emptied the island in two months. According to Cuban-American scholar Dr. Armando Lago, 83,000 Cubans have died at sea while attempting to leave Cuba.
Also revealing of the misery and desperation created by the Castro regime is Cuba’s suicide rate, which reached 24 per thousand in 1986 — making it double Latin America’s average, making it triple Cuba’s pre-Castro rate, making Cuban women the most suicidal in the world, and making death by suicide the primary cause of death for Cubans aged 15-48. At that point the Cuban government ceased publishing the statistics on the self-slaughter. The figures became state secrets. The implications seem to horrify even the government.
In 1958 Cuba had a higher standard of living than any Latin American country and half of Europe. A UNESCO report from 1957 said: “One feature of the Cuban social structure is a large middle class. Cuban workers are more unionized (proportional to the population) than U.S. workers….the average wage for an 8-hour day in Cuba 1957 is higher than for workers in Belgium, Denmark, France and Germany. Cuban labor receives 66.6 per cent of gross national income. In the U.S. the figure is 68 per cent. 44 per cent of Cubans were covered by Social legislation, that’s a higher percentage than in the U.S. at the time.”
In 1958 Cubans had the 3rd highest protein consumption in the hemisphere. But in 1962 Castro’s government introduced ration cards that persist to this day. The half-starved slaves on the ship Amistad ate better than the average Cuban eats today. This is true even though the Soviets ended up pumping some $130 billion into Cuba. That is the equivalent of ten Marshall Plans being pumped not into a war-ravaged continent of 300 million, but into an island of 7 to 9 million.
Promptly upon entering Havana on January 8, 1959, Fidel Castro abolished habeas corpus and appointed the Argentine Ernesto “Che” Guevara his main executioner. “To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary,” Guevara declared. “These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate. We must create the pedagogy of the paredon (the execution wall).”
Given the rate of firing squad executions in Cuba in the early 1960s, thousands of gallons of perfectly good, perfectly valuable blood gushed from the bodies of young men only to soak uselessly into the mud, wash into gutters, or get sopped up by buckets of sawdust. By 1961 Cuba’s government was already desperately short on foreign exchange. In two short years Castro had rendered a nation with a living standard higher than half of Europe and with a peso always on par with the U.S. dollar, utterly destitute, utterly bereft of foreign exchange. The massive Soviet subsidies could never compensate for the destruction of Cuba’s vibrant pre-Castro economy.
In 1961 an ocean of fresh, plasma-rich Cuban blood was being freed from its confines by bullets and spilling in torrents daily. The Castroites hit upon the scheme of collecting it and selling it. Dozens of those murdered after sham trials were U.S. citizens. Here are official court records — from the suit that Howard Anderson’s family filed against Castro’s regime: “Anderson vs. Republic of Cuba, No. 01-28628 (Miami-Dade Cir. April 13, 2003): ‘In one final session of torture, Castro’s agents drained Howard Anderson’s body of blood before sending him to his death at the firing squad.’”
Eighteen thousand bodies would eventually join Howard Anderson’s in mass graves. This tally comes — not from some Cuban-exile scandal sheet in Miami — but from The Black Book of Communism, written by French scholars and translated into English by the Harvard University press, not exactly an outpost of the vast right-wing conspiracy. But this cold statistic doesn’t tell the whole story.
Carlos Machado was 15 years old in 1963 when the bullets shattered his bound body. His twin brother and father collapsed beside Carlos from the same volley. All had resisted Castro’s theft of their humble family farm.
On Christmas eve 1961, Juana Diaz spat in the face of the Castroite executioners who were binding and gagging her. They’d found her guilty of feeding and hiding “counterrevolutionaries.” When the blast from that firing squad demolished her face and torso, Juana was six months pregnant.
Traditionally, firing squads have only two of its members with loaded guns. The rest shoot blanks. Not Castro’s. In his, all ten members shot live ammunition — all ten bullets ripped into the staked hero or heroine. This incorporated more members into Castro’s criminal organization, more members to resist desperately any overthrow of the system with the consequent settling of accounts.
Cuba’s population in 1960 was 6.2 million. According to the human rights group Freedom House, 500,000 Cubans (young and old, male and female) passed through Castro’s prison camps. At one time during 1961-62, some 300,000 Cubans were jailed for political offenses islandwide. This made Castro’s political incarceration rate higher than Stalin’s and Hitler’s.
Also, the longest serving political prisoners of the century spent their hell in Castro’s Gulag. Senores Mario Chanes de Armas, Angel de Fana, and Eusebio Penalver all served thirty years in Castro’s dungeons. Consider that Alexander Solzhenitsyn served 8 years in Stalin’s Gulag as did Natan Scharansky. Many Cubans served over three times as long.
“For months I was naked in a 6 x 4 foot cell,” recalls one prisoner, Eusebio Penalver (the longest serving black political prisoner of the century, jailed longer than Nelson Mandela). “That’s 4 feet high, so you couldn’t stand. But I felt a great freedom inside myself. I refused to commit spiritual suicide.”
Credit for finally exposing the horrors of Castro’s Gulag to a mass international audience must go to former political prisoner Armando Valladares and especially to his prison memoirs titled Against All Hope, released in 1984. Castro’s extensive and murderous Gulag had been in operation for over two decades by then and had been exposed and denounced by many, as had Stalin’s (Malcolm Muggeridge, Eugene Lyons, Arthur Koestler, etc.) in the 1930s and ’40s.
But just as it took the novelist Alexander Solzhenitzyn to finally shake the world awake about the Gulag thirty years after its murderous height, it took the poet Armando Valladares to expose Castroism to the mainstream, however late in the game. In 1960 Valladares had been arrested in his office for the crime of refusing to display a pro-Castro sign on his desk. He was summarily sentenced to 30 years of prison for the offense.
In prison, Valladares, like Eusebio Penalver, Chanes De Armas, Ernesto Diaz Rodriguez, Huber Matos and so many others, refused “to commit spiritual suicide.” Which is to say, they rejected any “rehabilitation,” or “re-education” by their jailers. They balked at any “confession” of their political sins. They knew all this applied only to their jailers. For this, Armando Valladares paid dearly. To this day he remains crippled from the beatings and starvings he endured in Castro’s Gulag.
Valladares managed to get his writings smuggled out of prison and into Europe. In December 1977, forty-seven U.S. Senators signed an appeal for his release, and Amnesty International took up his cause. In 1979 a book of Valladares’s poems was published. Titled Prisonnier de Castroappeared in Paris, it was translated by Pierre Golendorf, a former member of the French Communist Party. The book was dedicated to Valladares’ fellow prisoners and described their plight in harrowing detail, including the plight of women prisoners like “Berta, Ann Lazara, Maria Amalia, Esther, Miriam, roses amidst barbed wire, beaten mercilessly by the guards.”
International pressure, including personal appeals to Castro by his friend Francois Mitterand, finally won Valladares’ release in 1982. In 1984 he released his prison memoirs, titled Against all Hope, and in 1986, immediately after having read them, Ronald Reagan appointed Valladares U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Human Rights Commission. Here Valladares had his work cut out for him.
“Unbelievably, there has been a continuing love affair on the part of the media and many intellectuals with Fidel Castro,” he recalls. “While I was on book tours in the mid-1980s I encountered many individuals who argued fiercely on behalf of the Castro regime. The thousands of accusations of violations of human rights in Cuba conflicted with the double standard then current at the U.N. The posture of many countries was governed by their hostility against the United States, and they excused Castro out of a reflexive anti-Americanism.”
By 1965 counterrevolutionary activity was winding down in Cuba. The Kennedy-Khrushchev deal, with its subsequent roundup and jailing of anti-Castro fighters in the U.S. (men who’d been trained by the CIA for the very purpose a month before), pulled the plug on much of the anti-Castro resistance. Now the Castro regime, needing new pretext for mass jailings and the cowing of the population, turned its police loose on “anti-social elements,” on “deviants” and on “delinquents.” Youths were the target here, with special emphasis on long-hairs, rock & roll listeners and — especially — homosexuals.
In fact any youth who didn’t display a gung-ho “revolutionary” attitude was fair game. Jehovah’s Witnesses, active Catholics and Protestants, along with children of political prisoners, were swept up in the dragnet. “My charge read: ‘active in Catholic Associations,'” recalls Emilio Izquierdo, who was rounded up at the age of 17 in 1965, and who later became president in Miami of the UMAP Political Prisoners Association. The initials stood for Unidades Militares del Ayuda de Produccion,” or Military Units to Help Production, which were a special set of forced labor camps set up for young prisoners. The official title did little to hide the pretext for the camps — forced labor. These camps were completely enclosed by high barbed wire, had machine guns in each watchtower and ferocious dogs keeping watch below. The one enclosing the homosexuals had a sign that read “Work Will Make Men Out of You” above the entrance gate, eerily reminiscent of Auschwitz’s “Work Will Set You Free.”
“There seems to be an unusually strong emotional aversion to homosexuals in Cuba which Castro shares,” wrote Herbert Matthews of the New York Times, Castro’s original and foremost champion in the U.S. media. Not even he could deny it. Yet prior to Castro, homosexuals in Cuba lived perfectly normal lives. In fact the Cuban people had elected one President in 1945, Ramon Grau San Martin. Actually, Castroite persecution of Cuba’s homosexuals began two years before UMAP in 1963 with a government campaign called “Operation P” for (prostitutes, pimps and pederasts). In this campaign homosexuals were identified, rounded up and thrown in prison where their uniforms sported a big P. In the early and mid 1960s in Cuba, outing a homosexual to the police became a common practice for those seeking special favors or hoping to ingratiate themselves with the authorities.
The UMAP camps featured brutal labor in the tropical sun, and summary beatings and executions for any laggards. Word about this savagery soon got out amongst the general population and discontent was rife. After all, none of these prisoners had been convicted, even in the sham Castroite courts, of any counterrevolutionary crimes. Military and police trucks would simply surround an area of Havana known as, say, a homosexual hang-out, and every person in sight would be herded into the military trucks at gunpoint.
In 1968, according to official government notice, the UMAPs were disbanded. Their reputation had become too notorious. Technically the notice of this disbanding was accurate. After 1968 those “deviants” and other “anti-social elements” started being herded into “Battalions of Decisive Effort,” the “Young People’s Column of the Centennial,” and the “Young People’s Work Army.” Different names, same forced labor camps.
In a film titled Cursed Be Your Name, Liberty, Cuban exile Vladimir Ceballos documents how in the mid 1980s over one hundred Cuban youths deliberately injected themselves with the AIDS virus. At the time, Castro’s Cuba had developed a very efficient method of dealing with the malady. The patients were banished to “sanatoriums” in the middle of the countryside and were basically left alone till they died. “Left alone” is the key phrase here.
Apparently to some tortured souls, banishment in those AIDS sanitoriums smacked of freedom, as compared to life on the outside. Dr. Jorge Pérez, an exiled Cuban physician and AIDS specialist, now living in Spain, reports that in the mid ’80s the Cuban government ran ads on national television showing that these AIDS sanitoria featured air-conditioning, color TVs, swimming pools, and three meals of excellent food daily. Cuba’s population, of course, savored these things only in their dreams.
The ad was actually an attempt to snare volunteers for government experiments with AIDS vaccines. Any successful vaccines discovered as a result would translate into a deluge of foreign currency for Castro. As expected, the response to the ads was overwhelming, and the volunteers were interned in a sanitorium near Santiago de las Vegas in Havana province where they were injected with the AIDS virus. Dr. Pérez reports that the strain used was particularly strong, and ninety percent of the volunteers died the typically agonizing and prolonged AIDS death within two years.
JFK’s “dreary account of mismanagement, timidity and indecision,” as Eisenhower described his handling of the Bay of Pigs invasion, emboldened the Soviets to install nuclear missiles in Cuba the following year. Khrushchev documents in his memoirs how Castro pleaded with him to launch a pre-emptive nuclear attack on the U.S. in October of 1962. The telegram making the plea sits in the Kennedy Library today. Some think Khrushchev’s fear of Castro’s officers somehow getting hold of the nuclear buttons was a bigger factor in his decision to remove the missiles than the “blockade” (in fact, 55 ships breached it) imposed by the Kennedy administration around Cuba at the time.
The prudence of Khrushchev’s decision was revealed the following month by Castro’s second-in-command, Che Guevara. “If the missiles had remained,” he told The London Daily Worker in November 1962, “We would have used them against the very heart of the U.S., including New York. We must never establish peaceful co-existence. In this struggle to the death between 2 systems we must gain the ultimate victory. We must walk the path of liberation even if it costs millions of atomic victims.”
He didn’t get his hands on the missiles but Castro emerged the big winner of the Missile Crisis. “Many concessions were made by the Americans about which not a word has been said….perhaps one day they’ll be made public,” said Fidel Castro in a speech in 1966.
“We can’t say anything public about this agreement. It would be too much of a political embarrassment for us,” said Robert F. Kennedy to Soviet ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin in October of 1962.
In his memoirs Nikita Khrushchev himself clarified the matter: “It would have been ridiculous for us to go to war over Cuba — for a country 12,000 miles away. For us, war was unthinkable. We ended up getting exactly what we’d wanted all along, security for Fidel Castro’s regime, and American missiles removed from Turkey. Until today the U.S. has complied with her promise not to interfere with Castro and not to allow anyone else to interfere with Castro. After Kennedy’s death, his successor Lyndon Johnson assured us that he would keep the promise not to invade Cuba.”
With these factors in mind, the Castro regime’s longevity (so puzzling to many) becomes much easier to understand.
The Cuban Revolution started devouring its own children very early. Revolutionary Cuba’s first figurehead president, Manuel Urrutia, fled into exile for his very life exactly 6 months after his appointment by Castro, who went on TV to brand Urrutia a “traitor” and threatened him with the paredon. President Urrutia’s offense had been some mild criticism of Communism. The badly rattled Urrutia watched Castro’s TV tirade from his very Presidential office that night in July of 1959 while convulsed in sobs. Within minutes he noticed mobs forming in front of his office shrieking. “paredon!-paredon!” Quickly gathering his wits, he scrambled out the back door of the building and later that night slunk into the Venezuelan embassy disguised as a milkman.
Commander Huber Matos was credited by Castro himself with “saving the revolution” when he flew a planeload of arms into the Sierra Maestra from Costa Rica in March of 1958. The arms were donated by leftist Costa Rican President Jose “Pepe” Figueres and may have originated with the CIA, who in keeping with its support of the “Democratic Left” at the time, was very friendly with both Figueres and Castro’s July 26th Movement. “Me and my staff were all Fidelistas!” proclaimed Robert Reynolds, the CIA’s Caribbean desk chief from 1957-60. Reynolds made his pronouncement during a friendly chat with Fidel Castro himself at a “Bay of Pigs, 40 Years After” Conference held in Havana, in April 2001.
After arriving with the arms, Matos, a July 26th underground operative till then, was quickly named a “comandante” in the Rebel army as well. In December of that year he led a rebel column into the city of Santiago, then entered Havana on January 8th atop the same Sherman tank with Fidel Castro.
Upon the Revolutionary triumph, Castro appointed Matos military commander of Camaguey province where Matos signed off on the prompt firing-squad executions of over 60 Batista soldiers, including a wounded one who was carried to the stake on a stretcher. Nine months later Matos was facing a firing squad himself, accused by Castro of “treason.”
“Fidel, you are destroying your own work,” Matos, alarmed at what he saw as the Communist usurpation of the Revolution, had written to Castro. “You are burying the revolution. Perhaps there is still time. I plead with you, comrade. Help us save the revolution….Fidel, we fought in the name of Truth, for all the sound principles that bind civilization and mankind together. Please, in the names of our fallen comrades, Fidel, do not bury the revolution.”
That letter sealed Matos’ doom. Raul Castro and Che Guevara wanted him immediately lined up at the paredon and executed. Castro thought it over and countered that he didn’t want to make Matos “a martyr.” With Matos’ trial most of the “moderates” (democratic socialists) still in Castro’s government had to finally face the music. Most resigned, went underground, and then went into exile — in that order.
Matos ended up suffering 20 years in Castro’s dungeons. He refused any and all “rehabilitation” by his jailers and suffered horribly for it. He was finally released in 1979 and lived in Miami until his death in February 2014. There, he headed the political group Cuba Democratica y Independente (CID).
Among other Revolutionary “Comandantes” who fought alongside Castro against Batista and served early in Castro’s regime, but weren’t quite as fortunate as Matos, were Humberto Sori Marin and William “El Americano” Morgan. Both fell out with La Revolucion over Communism. And the way Castro saw it, they were the traitors, not him.
Humberto Sori Marin was arrested in April of 1961 as a counterrevolutionary and his brother Mariano went to visit Castro, pleading clemency for his brother. If for no other reason than “for old times sake,” pleaded Mariano, recalling when Fidel and Humberto had been Revolutionary comrades.
“Don’t worry Mariano,” a smiling Castro said while slapping him affectionately on the back. “In the Sierra I learned to love your brother. Yes, he’s in our custody, but completely safe from harm. Absolutely nothing will happen to him. Please give your mom and dad a big hug and big kiss from me and tell them to please calm down.”
The next day Mariano collapsed at the sight of his brother Humberto’s mangled corpse in a mass grave. Castro’s firing squad had pumped over 20 shots into his brother’s body that very dawn. Humberto Sori Marin’s head was almost completely obliterated, his face unrecognizable.
“Kneel and beg for your life!” Castro’s executioners taunted the bound and helpless William Morgan as he glowered at Castro’s firing squad in April 1961.
“I kneel for no man!” former Rebel Comandante Morgan snarled back, according to eye witness John Martino in his book, I Was Castro’s Prisoner.
“Very well, Meester Weel-yam Morgan,” replied his executioners, who were aiming low, on purpose — “FUEGO!”
The first volley shattered Morgan’s knees. He collapsed snarling and writhing. “See, Meester Morgan?” giggled a voice from above. “We made you kneel, didn’t we?” Over the next few minutes as he lay writhing, four more bullets slammed into Morgan, all very carefully aimed to miss vitals. Finally an executioner walked up and emptied a Tommy gun clip into Morgan’s back.
Castro had saddled Rebel army Comandante Camilo Cienfuegos with the unhappy task of arresting his friend Huber Matos after the latter’s “treason.” Cienfuegos was right up there with the Castro brothers and Che in the Revolutionary hierarchy. He’d landed on the Granma expedition from Mexico, then fought in the Sierra from day one, climaxing the rebellion by commanding rebel forces in the decisive “battle” (skirmish, actually, like all the others) of Santa Clara that finally forced Batista to lose hope and flee the island. Camilo actually entered Havana before Castro, where he promptly took command of the military headquarters at Camp Colombia.
Camilo Cienfuegos was handsome, charismatic, and in the eyes of many, actually outshone Fidel at early Revolutionary rallies, often stealing the limelight with his ready smile and humor. “Simpatico,” is the term Cubans use for Camilo Cienfuegos’ personality. Castro seemed to recognize this and actually turned to Camilo one day on the podium during a rally, “Voy bien, Camilo?” Fidel asked (am I doing OK, Camilo?) Such deference was — to say the least — not a Castro trademark.
Camilo had flown to Camaguey from Havana for the hateful task of arresting his friend and ally Matos. The two had often discussed, with growing alarm, what they saw as the Communist usurpation of the Cuban Revolution. Once in Camaguey, Camilo had a violent row with Raul Castro, whom he’d always loathed. They were on the verge of fisticuffs and drawn pistols when finally separated.
On the flight back to Havana after he dutifully arrested Matos, Camilo Cienfuegos disappeared without a trace. His plane crashed and vanished, said the authorities, though the evening had excellent weather according to all records. The Castro brothers made a big show of a search and rescue but nothing turned up. To many, including Huber Matos, Camilo’s death seemed much too convenient. To this day, most Cuban-exiles blame Fidel and Raul for Camilo’s death.
Cienfuegos was too obviously their competitor for leadership. Interestingly, two of Camilo’s loyal lieutenants died in “accidents” within days of their commander’s disappearance. The head of Camaguey’s small airport, from where Camilo had taken off, was also suspicious and was starting to ask questions about the rescue effort. Two weeks after Camilo’s disappearance, he was found with a bullet through his head. His death was ruled a “suicide.” Camilo Cienfuegos was far from the last Fidelista Comandante to run afoul of Fidel’s megalomania.
Arnaldo Ochoa was the Cuban General widely credited with Cuba’s victories in both The Angolan Civil War and in Ethiopia’s early crushing of the Eritrean rebellion. “Every officer in the Cuban armed forces admired Ochoa,” according to Cuban defector General Rafael Del Pino, who was close to Ochoa both personally and professionally. “General Ochoa always fulfilled his duty. He was an austere individual devoted to military life and his hands are not stained with blood.”
They say he was a soldiers’ general, who always showed genuine interest in the welfare of his men and so had the respect and admiration of the lowliest troops. Ochoa was also close and on very friendly terms with both Fidel and Raul Castro, the latter being Ochoa’s immediate superior, whom the General always affectionately called “jefe.” Besides his African ventures, Arnaldo Ochoa had fought in the Sierra as a Rebel and helped crush the Escambray peasant rebellion in 1961. In 1963 he infiltrated Venezuela to train and lead guerrillas trying to overthrow Romulo Betancourt. Later he transferred to Nicaragua where he led the fight against the Contras. In 1980 Fidel himself personally awarded General Ochoa with the medal officially naming him a “Hero of the Revolution.”
In the dawn hours of July 13, 1989, General Arnaldo T. Ochoa was executed by a firing squad outside of Havana.
In brief, he’d grown to big for his britches. Even Stalin could tolerate (or perhaps never quite figured out how to eliminate, or perhaps even feared) a Zhukov. Nothing of the sort occurred with Fidel Castro and his generals, no matter how battle-hardened or loyal.
A court martial had found Ochoa guilty of “corruption and dishonest use of economic resources,” of “departing from the principles of the Revolution,” and of “committing grave moral and legal violations of socialist law.” The official charge was drug smuggling, and Ochoa was almost certainly guilty. In Africa, Ochoa had used black marketing of everything from elephant tusks to diamonds to liquor, to help finance his military operations. He obviously had approval for these ventures from on high.
By 1989, U.S. Federal prosecutors had uncovered the Cuban military’s role in cocaine smuggling into the U.S. Fidel and Raul watched the case building against them with growing alarm. So they served up Ochoa (and Comandante Tony De la Guardia who was executed alongside him) as scapegoats. In fact, some of the evidence used against Ochoa at his trial is rumored to have originated with the FBI.
Rafael Del Pino mentions another reason for Ochoa’s elimination. In the defecting Air Force General’s very well-informed opinion, Castro executed Ochoa “to rid himself of an independent-minded man while diverting public attention from the island’s mounting problems. Castro used the excuse of corruption to destroy Ochoa because he often chose his own course in making decisions. Ochoa was a pragmatic, non-ideological man, who was flexible enough to recognize the sense behind Gorbachev’s reforms of the time. Even worse, Ochoa, like many other Cuban military officers, was trained in the Soviet Union and had close ties to the Soviet leaders then involved in the reforms.”
That Glasnost and Perestroika stuff could be contagious, in other words.
Ochoa’s and De la Guardia’s deaths did nothing to curb Cuba’s role in drug smuggling. On December 3, 1998, Colombian police seized seven tons of cocaine in Cartagena, Colombia. They found that the shipment was consigned to a Cuban state-owned venture and was destined for the U.S. In 1996 a federal prosecutor in south Florida told the Miami Herald, “The case we have against Fidel and Raul Castro right now is much stronger than the one we had against Manuel Noriega in 1988.” Four grand juries at the time had disclosed Cuba’s role in drug smuggling into the U.S. The Clinton administration, hellbent on cozying up to Castro at the time, refused to press ahead with the case against the Castro brothers’ dope trafficking.
Castro’s career in terrorism started while he was a student at the University of Havana. He was credited with the murder of fellow student Manolo Castro, and the attempted murder of Leonel Gomez, whom he shot through the throat but who survived. Both were Castro’s rivals for leadership in a University student group. Both were shot from behind in ambushes. University policeman Fernandez Caral had witnessed the shootings, was prepared to testify, and was himself murdered by Fidel Castro on July 7th 1948. The off-duty Caral sat on his doorstep with his 5 year old son on his knee when Fidel Castro approached and shot him point-blank in the chest. Raphael Diaz-Balart, Castro’s brother-in-law at the time, recalls an agitated Fidel bursting into his apartment that day. “You gotta hide me!” Castro blurted. “I just killed Caral!”
That same year Castro traveled to Bogota, Colombia, where he was among the ringleaders in the famous Bogotazo, a Communist-inspired riot that ended up killing 5,000 people. Castro’s July 26th Movement — his anti-Batista revolutionary group (named after the failed attack on Cuba’s Moncada military barracks on July 26, 1953 that touched off his rebellion against Batista) — was actually a pioneer in 20th century terrorism. They carried off among the first airplane hijackings in history. In the last months of 1958, members of Castro’s movement hijacked three different Cubana airliners at gunpoint. The last one was a flight from Miami to Varadero that was diverted at gunpoint to rebel-held territory in Cuba’s eastern Oriente province. Despite the pilot’s frantic pleas, the plane was forced to attempt a landing on a tiny airstrip near Raul Castro’s rebel camp, where it crashed in a huge fireball. Seventeen of the twenty passengers died in the explosion.
A few months earlier, Castro’s rebels had kidnapped 50 U.S. citizens near Guantanamo. Most were Marines and Navy men on leave. A few were civilian workers from a U.S. mining company headquartered nearby. Though the term was not in vogue at the time, Castro’s guerrillas used these American hostages as “human shields” against the Batista air force’s sporadic bombings of rebel-held areas. And it worked. The last thing Batista wanted was more raging by the U.S. media against him — not that it could have gotten much worse.
Castro had only been in power for two months when he started sending armed guerrillas to attempt the overthrow of neighboring nations. The Dominican Republic, Panama, Nicaragua, Haiti and Venezuela were the early targets. In fact Castro’s very first trip abroad as head of state was to Caracas, where on January 25, 1959, he implored then-Venezuelan President Romulo Betancourt to join his “master plan against the gringos!” Basically this involved massive loans, financial aid and shipments of free oil to Castro from Venezuela. Betancourt balked, and no sooner had Castro returned home empty-handed, than he was planning subversion in Venezuela, including assassination attempts against Betancourt.
It took Hugo Chavez to finally enlist with Castro’s plan. In 2004 Cuba got $1.3 billion in essentially free oil from Venezuela. By mid-2005, some 160,000 barrels of oil were flowing from Venezuela to Cuba daily. This was much more oil than Cuba’s refineries could process, because most of this oil was resold to Central American nations by Cuba, who pocketed the handsome profit. Here was the second half of the “master plan against the gringos,” that Castro had originally proposed to Romulo Betancourt.
Castro’s subversion — not just of his neighbors, but throughout Latin America, the Middle East and Africa — reached a point where the U.S. Defense Department estimated that 42,000 foreign guerrillas and terrorists had received their training in Cuba. Not that Castro’s own home-grown terrorists had been exactly idle.
On November 17, 1962, the FBI uncovered a terrorist plot that targeted Manhattan’s Grand Central Terminal and the Statue of Liberty, along with the Macy’s, Gimbels and Bloomindales department stores. The plotters had 12 detonators and 500 kilos of TNT. The explosions were planned for November 27, 1962, the day after Thanksgiving, the busiest shopping day of the year. The chief plotter was Roberto Santiesteban, chief aide to Cuba’s U.N. ambassador, Carlos Lechuga. Under him were Elsa and Jose Gomez, also employed by Cuba’s diplomatic mission at the U.N. The rest of the conspirators belonged to The Fair Play for Cuba Committee. Had those detonators gone off, thousands of people would have died in a matter of seconds. In 2003 alone, the U.S. was forced to expel 14 Cuban “diplomats.” All worked at the United Nations.
On March 19, 1976, the Los Angeles Times ran the headline “Cuban Link to Death Plot Probed.” The plan was for both Republican presidential candidates of the day — incumbent President Gerald Ford and former California governor Ronald Reagan — to be assassinated during the Republican National Convention in San Francisco. The Emiliano Zapata Unit, a Bay Area radical-terrorist group, was slated to make the hits. When arrested, one of the would-be assassins named Gregg Daniel Adornetto, revealed the Cuban connection. The Zapata Unit’s Cuban intelligence officer was named Andres Gomez. Adornetto had met him years earlier when he’d traveled to Cuba for training and funding as a member of the Weather Underground.
Much evidence points to an earlier assassination plot by Castro against a U.S. President succeeding. “U.S. leaders who plan on eliminating Cuban leaders should not think that they are themselves safe!” warned Castro on September 7, 1963. “We are prepared to answer in kind!”
Many of those closest to the early evidence (prior to the Warren Commission’s) are convinced that Castro made good on his boast. “I’ll tell you something that will rock you,” Lyndon Johnson told Howard K. Smith in 1966. “Kennedy tried to get Castro — but Castro got Kennedy first.”
General Alexander Haig agreed with LBJ. Haig served as a military aide under both the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. “As I read the secret report I felt a sense of physical shock, a rising of the hair on the back of my neck,” he writes about an incident one month after the Kennedy assassination when a classified report crossed his desk. “I walked the report over to my superiors and watched their faces go ashen. “From this moment, Al,” said his superiors, “you will forget you ever read this piece of paper, or that it ever existed.”
The classified intelligence report that so rattled Haig and caused so many faces to go ashen, described how a few days before the Dallas assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald, accompanied by Castro intelligence agents, had been spotted in Havana, where he’d traveled from Mexico City.
Amidst a stack of declassified Soviet correspondence that Boris Yeltsin made available to President Bill Clinton in the early 1990s was a letter from Jacqueline Kennedy to Nikita Khrushchev dated just ten days after the assassination. In it Mrs. Kennedy assures the Soviet leader that she doesn’t suspect Soviet involvement in her husband’s assassination. She wrote that she was convinced the culprit was Castro.
For 34 years Markus Wolf was the chief of East Germany’s foreign intelligence service, a branch of the STASI with many contacts and operations in Castro’s Cuba. It was the STASI rather than the KGB that undertook the training of Castro’s police and intelligence services. Wolf’s autobiography is titled Man Without a Face, and subtitled The Autobiography of Communism’s Greatest Spymaster. Most intelligence experts agree that the subtitle fits. Wolf was once asked about the Kennedy assassination and quickly replied. “Don’t ask me — ask Fidel Castro.”
In 1966 Havana hosted the Tri-Continental Conference, a worldwide convention for guerrillas and terrorists. It was the first gathering of its kind, where Castro vowed to aid any group, anywhere, that was fighting “colonialism, neocolonialism, and imperialism.”
Among other initiatives at the Conference, Cuba formed the OSPAAAL (Organization of Solidarity with the People from Africa, Asia and Latin America) and the DLN (National Liberation Directorate). The latter was under the direction of KGB Col. Vadim Kotchergine and set up massive terrorist training camps in western Cuba. These camps were soon filled with guerrillas and terrorists from groups like Al Fatah, the Sandinistas, El Salvador’s FMLF, the Tupamaros, the Weather Underground, the IRA, and Spain’s ETA. In 1968 Castro sent military instructors into Palestinian bases in Jordan to train Palestinian Fedayeen. In November 1974 Castro personally decorated his brother-in-arms, Yasir Arafat, with Cuba’s highest honor, the Bay of Pigs Medal. The Egyptian newspaper Ahar Sa’ah reported on September 13, 1978, that 500 Palestinian fighters were training in Cuba.
Ilich Ramirez Sanchez, the infamous “Carlos The Jackal” known as the world’s most notorious terrorist throughout the 1970’s, received his training in Cuba and lived there for years. Everyone from America’s Black Liberation Army to Puerto Rico’s Macheteros, to South Yemen’s NLF, to Argentina’s Monteneros, to Colombia’s ELN , to Namibia’s SWAPO, to the Black Panther Party, to the Western Sahara’s Polisaro, to the IRA, received training and funding from Castro. “Thanks to Castro,” boasted Colombia’s FARC (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia) commander Tiro-Fijo in a 2001 interview, “we are now a powerful army, not a hit-and-run band.”
Scholar Walter Laquer sums it up in his work, The Age of Terrorism: “Multinational terrorism reached a first climax in the early 1970s. It involved close co-operation between small terrorist groups in many countries with the Libyans, Algerians, Syrians, North Koreans and Cubans acting as the paymasters and suppliers of weapons and equipment.”
The U.S. State Department listed Cuba prominently among its “State Sponsors of Terrorism” from 1982-2015.
As of mid-2005 Cuba provided haven for 77 fugitives from U.S. law, including several on the FBI’s most wanted listed. Among these were cop-killers Michael Finney, Charlie Hill, and Joanne Chesimard, along with Victor Gerena, who was responsible for a $7 million heist of a Wells Fargo truck in Connecticut in 1983 as a member of the Puerto Rican terrorist group Los Macheteros. All requests for their extradition had been repeatedly ignored or rebuffed.
By 1976 Castro’s intervention abroad became more blatant when he sent tens of thousands of troops to Africa. Most — 50,000 of them — went to fight Jonas Savimbi’s UNITA forces in Angola. Thousands more went to prop up the Marxist Mengistu regime in Ethiopia. And others were scattered throughout the continent from Guinea Bissau to Bourkina Fasso to Sierra Leone to Mozambique to Zimbabwe. All told, by 1983, Cuban troops were stationed in 20 sub-Saharan African nations. In 1988 Dr. Aubin Heyndrickx, the senior United Nations consultant on chemical warfare, documented that, “There is no doubt anymore that the Cubans are using nerve gases (Sarin) against the troops of Mr. Jonas Savimbi.”
“War against the United States is my true destiny,” Fidel Castro had confided to a friend in 1958 while still a rebel in the hills. “When this war’s over I’ll start that much bigger war.” (Note: Castro said this before any of the alleged “bullying” by the U.S. that leftists claim as the reason he turned to Communism and the Soviet Union.)
After defecting in 1964, Castro’s own sister brought the unmistakable message to Congress. “Fidel’s feeling of hatred for this country cannot even be imagined by you Americans,” she testified to the House Committee on Un-American Activities. “His intention — his OBSESSION — is to destroy the U.S.!”
According to General Rafael del Pino — onetime head of Castro’s Air Force, who defected in 1987 during the U.S. invasion of Grenada — Castro ordered military plans for the destruction of the Turkey Point Nuclear Plant south of Miami. With his nuclear weapons having been snatched back by Khrushchev in October of 1962, Castro here was opting for the next-best thing. “I want to do something that the Yankees will remember for the rest of their lives!” Del Pino recalls Castro raving. “And when we’re gone, history will remind the Yankees that we were the only ones who made them pay dearly for their imperialistic arrogance around the world!”
In pursuit of his obsession to harm America, Castro also made alliance with Iran. “Together Iran and Cuba can bring America to her knees!” raved Castro to a thunderous ovation at Tehran University in August 2001. Four years later — in a January 16, 2005 meeting with the visiting Cuban Vice President, Jose Ramon Fernandez — Iranian Majlis Speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad Adel said: “Iran is strengthening her economic and political relations with Cuba, and there exist other areas for cooperation.”
In late July 2006, Castro handed the reins of Cuba’s government temporarily to his brother (Raul Castro) and a few cabinet ministers, after undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Fidel Castro remained in poor health even following the surgery, though he continued to play an active role in running government affairs from behind the scenes over the ensuing year-and-a-half.
On February 19, 2008 — just five days before the Cuban National Assembly was scheduled to meet to select a new head of state — Fidel Castro announced his permanent resignation in a letter to his countrymen which was read on Cuban radio and television. Wrote Castro: “I will not aspire to neither will I accept — I repeat I will not aspire to neither will I accept — the position of president of the Council of State and commander in chief…. It would betray my conscience to occupy a responsibility that requires mobility and the total commitment that I am not in the physical condition to offer.”
Castro died on November 25, 2016.
This profile (except for the introductory background and the brief section dealing with post-2005 events) was written in by Humberto Fontova, author of Fidel: Hollywood’s Favorite Tyrant.
 Washington Post , July 31, 1959
 Earl T. Smith. The Fourth Floor. Random House, 1962
 Encinosa, Enrique, Cuba En Guerra. The Endowment for Cuban American Studies, 1994
 Johnson, Stephen, Time For a Concensus on Cuba. The Heritage Foundation, 2002
 U.S Dept of Commerce. Investment In Cuba, 1958
 Enrique Encinosa, Escambray; La Guerra Olvidada. Editorial SIBI, 1989
 Alberto Bustamante, Notas y Estadisticas Sobre Los Grupos Etnicos En Cuba, Revista Herencia, volume 10, 2004
 Juan Tamayo. Suicide Epidemic Exists Under Castro. The Miami Herald, June 18, 1998
 Montaner, Carlos Alberto. Fidel Castro y la Revolucion Cubana, Transaction Publishers, 1984
 Enrique Ros, Che; Mito y Realidad, Ediciones Universal, 2002
 Author interview with Eusebio Penalver
 Michael Beschloss, The Crisis Years. Harper Collins, 1991
 Lazo, Mario. Daga en el Corazón; Cuba Traicionada. Minerva, 1972
 Weiner, Tim. Bay of Pigs Enemies Finally Sit Down Together. New York Times, March 23, 2001
 Matos, Huber, Como Llego la Noche. Editores Tusquets, Barcelona, 2002
 Triay, Victor. The Bay Of Pigs, University Press of Florida, 2001
 Martino, John. I Was Castro’s Prisoner. Devin-Adair, New York, 1963
 Franqui, Carlos. Camilo Cienfuegos, Editorial Seix Barral, Barcelona, 2001
 Benemiles, Juan. Las Guerras Secretas de Fidel Castro. Fundacion Elena Mederas, 2002
 Castro Drug Probe Collapses in Heap of Dead Ends, Lies, Miami Herald, November 24, 1996
 Communist Threat to the United States Through the Caribbean: Congressional testimony in 1960 of the late Raphael Diaz-Balart, father of Republican Congressmen Mario and Lincoln Diaz-Balart.
 Flight 482 Is Missing. TIME Magazine, Nov. 17, 1958
 Bringuier, Carlos, Red Friday. Chas Hallberg & Co., 1969
 El Universal, Caracas, Venezuela, June 6, 2005
 Fontova, Humberto, Fidel; Hollywood’s Favorite Tyrant. Regnery, 2005
 Bringuier, Carlos, Red Friday. Chas Hallberg & Co., 1969
 Haig, Alexander, Inner Circles. Warner Books, 1992
 Montaner, Carlos Alberto. Castro, Jacqueline y la Muerte de Kennedy, El Nuevo Herald, August 27th, 1999
 Blazquez, Agustin. Castro’s Anti-Semitism and the PLO, Newsmax, April 15, 2002
 CNN Report, Jan. 1, 1999
 Benemiles, Juan. Las Guerras Secretas de Fidel Castro. Fundacion Elena Mederas, 2002
 Betancourt, Ernesto. Former minister in Castro’s first government on Radio Marti News
 Iranian Press Service, May 10th, 2001
 Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, Jan 16, 2005
– / –