ΕΝΗΜΕΡΩΣΗ!..

1. 5 ilde teyakkuza geçildi! İstihbarat geldi, bölgeden çıkamıyorlar

Terör örgütü PKK’ya son 4 yılda Doğu Karadeniz bölgesinde vurulan ağır darbelerin ardından sözde ‘Karadeniz açılım grubu’ yok edilmişti. PKK’nın Karadeniz için planladığı yeni grup ise deşifre oldu.

ω
09.07.2019 
Alınan istihbaratlar ve yapılan çalışmalar sonucunda bölgeye gönderileceği değerlendirilen PKK‘ların kimlikleri belirlendi. Aralarında İçişleri Bakanlığı tarafından hazırlanan terörden arananlar listesinde yeşil kategoride, turuncu kategoride ve gri kategoride yer alan teröristlerinde bulunduğu grubun Tunceli, Erzincan kırsalında süren operasyonlar sonucu bölgeden hareket edemedikleri ise yapılan çalışmalar sonucu ortaya çıktı.

Giresun Jandarma Bölge Komutanlığının 5 ilde bin 700 askerle yaz başında başlattığı operasyonlar devam ederken Tunceli üzerinde Erzincan yolunu kullanarak yaşanabilecek sızlamalara karşı Giresun, Ordu, Trabzon, Gümüşhane ve Tokat sınırlarında operasyonların sıklaştırıldığı öğrenildi.

PKK’da önce Karadeniz kırsalında bulunan örgüt üyelerini yeniden bölgeye göndermek istediği belirlendi.

Aralarında İçişleri Bakanlığı’nın düzenlediği Terörden aranalar listesinde yer alan ve başına 1 milyon TL ödül koyulan Berbang’ kod adlı Kamuran Daşdemir, turuncu listede bulunan ve başına 600 bin TL ödül koyulan Sipan’ kod adlı İdris Sevgin ve terörden arananlarda gri listede bulunan Zerdeşt’ kod adlı Eyvaz Beyaz‘ın da olduğu bilgisine ulaşıldı.

Bölgede ise adeta kuş uçurtulmuyor. Yapılan başarılı operasyonlar sonuç vermiş ve PKK’nın sözde Doğu Karadeniz grubu sözde üst düzey yöneticileri ile beraber yok edilmişti.

Öte yandan güvenlik güçleri bölgede oldukları değerlendirilen iki PKK’lı ‘Rojhan Ankara’ Kod adlı Rahman Sümer ve ‘Rızgar’ kod adlı Reşit Ertuş‘un izini sürüyor.

ΕΜΕΙΣ ΣΟΥ ΤΑ ΛΕΓΑΜΕ ΧΑΚΑΝ, ΑΛΛΑ ΕΣΕΙΣ, ΑΚΟΜΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΩΡΑ, ΓΡΑΦΕΤΕ… PKK΄NİN KARADENIZ GRUBU YOK EDİLMİŞTİ!..

2.

AK Parti’den Yunanistan‘a uyarı: Sonuçları iyi olmayacak

AK Parti Sözcüsü Çelik, Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’ın milletvekilleriyle yaptığı toplantının ardından açıklama yaptı. Yeni sistem tartışmalarıyla ilgili açıklama yapan Çelik, Milletvekillerimizin değerlendirmeleri oluyor. Tıkanıklıklar gözden geçirilecek” dedi. Yunanistan Dışişleri Bakanı’nın açıklamasına da tepki gösteren Çelik, “Özür dilemesi gerekiyor. Bu şekilde devam ederse sonuçları iyi olmayacak” diye konuştu.

10.07.2019
AK Parti Sözcüsü Ömer Çelik, Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’ın milletvekilleriyle yaptığı istişare toplantısının ardından açıklama yaptı. Çelik’in açıklamalarından öne çıkanlar şöyle:

İç politikayla ilgili konular, seçim değerlendirmeleri ve dış politikalarla ilgili arkadaşlarımızın değerlendirmeleri oluyor. Ayrıca Cumhurbaşkanımız G20 Zirvesi’yle ilgili ayrıntılı bilgi verdi. Yarın MKYK toplantımızı gerçekleştireceğiz. Basın toplantısı gerçekleştireceğiz.

Cumhurbaşkanlığı Hükümet Sistemi milletimizin onayıyla hayata geçti. Bir yılı geride kaldı. Tüm bunların geniş bir değerlendirmesi yapılıyor. Uygulanması konusunda biz, pratik konularını tabii ki tartışıyoruz. Milletvekillerimizin önerileri önemlidir. Kendilerinin illeriyle merkezi hükümet arasındaki ilişkilerin verimliliği ve hızı açısından ortaya koyduğu notlar dikkatle değerlendiriliyor. Bu sistemin en önemli özelliği vatandaşın devletten hızlı hizmet alabilmesiydi. Milletvekillerimizin zaman zaman bazı bürokratik makamlarda bu hızı göremedikleri değerlendirmeleri oluyor. Tıkanıklıklar gözden geçirilecek.

Ali Babacan’ın istifası

Sayın Cumhurbaşkanımızın yaptığı değerlendirmeyi gördünüz. Onun dışında herhangi bir gündem yok. Bundan sonra eksikliklerimizin giderilmesi, güçlü olan yanlarımızın daha da pekiştirilmesi dışında bir gündem söz konusu değil.

Yunanistan‘dan Doğu Akdeniz açıklaması

Kullanılan üslup devlet adamı üslubu değil. Türkiye‘yi sürekli sağa sola şikayet ettiğini görüyoruz. Tabii Rum kesimi ayrı bir problem kaynağı. Esasen Avrupa Birliği’nin içinde de Rum kesiminin tek başına Avrupa Birliği’ne alınmasının ne kadar büyük bir sorun olduğunu söylerler. Rum kesiminin bu haylaz çocuk olma durumu Avrupa Birliği’nin de gündemindedir.

Yunanistan Dışişleri Bakanı’na tavsiyemiz şudur: Son derece sıradan bir üslup kullanmasın. Türkiye’nin dostluğu kıymetlidir. Ama tabii Yunanistan Dışişleri Bakanı bu üslupla başlamış oldu, bu şekilde devam edecekse bunun iyi sonuçları olmayacaktır.”

Κε Τσελίκ! Αγαπητέ Ομέρ!

– Κάθε πότε, εκεί στο “ΑΚΡ” ή στο Τ/ΥΠΕΞ, δεν μπορώ να ξέρω, παραδίδετε μαθήματα “Φαναριώτικης Διπλωματίας”, (την οποία, από το 1453 και μετά, την οικειοποιηθήκατε πλήρως, όπως τόσα άλλα δικά μας), ώστε να ερχόμαστε και να τα παρακολουθούμε, μπας και γίνουμε καλύτεροι; Είναι άραγε πολύ προχωρημένο το Φαναριώτικο μάθημα της παράλληλης έκφρασης συμβουλής, με ταυτόχρονη απειλή;

– «”Μαζέψου” και εσύ Ομέρ και όλοι σας εκεί, διότι το έχετε παραγαμ… ει»! Αυτή είναι η δική μας συμβουλή!Πρόσεξε τώρα τί θα διαβάσεις και προβληματίσου:

Εμείς Ομέρ, είμαστε, ως χώρα και ως Πολίτευμα, ένα τόπι, (μιας που έχουμε Καλοκαίρι), που φουσκώνει και ξεφουσκώνει και παίζουν τα παιδιά ή και οι μεγάλοι ακόμα ή ένα μαξιλάρι, για όσους έχουν… αυχενικό σύνδρομο, που ομοίως φουσκώνει και ξεφουσκώνει, και που τελικά ούτε το τόπι, ούτε και το μαξιλάρι παθαίνει τίποτα, αλλά εσείς είστε ένα φουσκωμένο μπαλόνι, που κινδυνεύει, από στιγμή σε στιγμή, να σκάσει και μετά… πάπαλα Ομέρ ή (και άλλο ένα παράδειγμα) ένα αυγό, το οποίο μόλις “φάει” ένα κτύπημα διαλύεται

Ömer!

Bügünkü Sözlerin beni çok üzdü!.. 

3. Milli Savunma Bakanlığı, Hakkari’de teröristlerce askeri araca düzenlenen saldırıda 2 askerin şehit olduğunu, bir askerin yaralandığını açıkladı.

09-07-2019

ΕΪ ΕΚΕΙ ΣΤΟ Τ/ΓΕΕΔ! ΑΠΟ ΤΟ 1984 ΤΑ ΙΔΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΑ ΙΔΙΑ ΠΑΝΤΑ! ΔΕΝ ΜΠΟΡΕΙΤΕ ΝΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΚΑΤΑΒΑΛΛΕΤΕ ΤΟΥΣ ΚΟΥΡΔΟΥΣ ΡΕΕΕΕΕΕΕΕΕ! ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΠΛΑ ΘΕΜΑ ΧΡΟΝΟΥ Η -ΑΡΧΙΚΑ- ΑΥΤΟΝΟΜΙΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΣΗΜΕΡΙΝΗ ΝΑ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑ, ΣΕ ΠΑΡΑΛΛΗΛΗ… ΓΡΑΜΜΗ ΔΥΣΤΥΧΩΣ, ΜΕ ΣΥΝΕΧΗ ΘΥΜΑΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΚΑ ΣΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΩΝ ΚΟΥΡΔΩΝ! 

ΣΕΒΑΣΤΕΙΤΕ ΕΠΙΤΕΛΟΥΣ ΕΝΑΝ ΛΑΟ 3000 ΕΤΩΝ ΡΕ ΜΟΓΟΛΛΟΙ!.. (ΤΗΝ ΛΕΞΗ “ΣΕΒΑΣΜΟ”, ΕΠΕΙΔΗ ΔΕΝ ΤΗΝ ΓΝΩΡΙΖΕΤΕ, ΠΑΡΑ ΜΟΝΟΝ ΑΥΤΗΝ ΠΟΥ ΑΝΤΙΠΡΟΣΩΠΕΥΕΙ Η ΙΣΧΥΣ ΤΩΝ ΟΠΛΩΝ, ΠΑΡΑΚΑΛΟΥΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΜΕΤΑΦΡΑΣΤΗ ΣΑΣ, ΝΑ ΣΑΣ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΑΛΥΣΕΙ)!.. 

4. 

Η Τουρκία θα πρέπει να ανακοινώσει ότι είναι έτοιμη για αμοιβαίες συμφωνίες οριοθέτησης της ΑΟΖ της, αντί μονίμως να κάνει ενστάσεις για τις συμφωνίες ΑΟΖ που σύναψαν άλλα κράτη, αναφέρει ο επιτελάρχης των τουρκικών ναυτικών ενόπλων δυνάμεων αντιναύαρχος Τσιχάτ Γιαϊτζί.

Σύμφωνα με τον Τούρκο Αντιναύαρχο στην ανατολική Μεσόγειο πρέπει να κηρυχθεί ΑΟΖ. Σύμφωνα με την εφημερίδα Μιλλιέτ, σε ειδικό σύγγραμμα που ετοίμασε ο Τούρκος αντιναύαρχος για την ανατολική Μεσόγειο, αναφέρει ότι το χειρότερο σενάριο για την Τουρκία και τα συμφέροντά της θα είναι η υπογραφή συμφωνιών για τον διαμοιρασμό των θαλάσσιων αρμοδιοτήτων στην ανατολική Μεσόγειο μεταξύ Ελλάδας – Αιγύπτου και Ελλάδας- Κύπρου.

Ο Τούρκος αντιναύαρχος αναφέρει ότι στην περίπτωση που γίνει κάτι τέτοιο “τα 189 χιλιάδες χλμ θαλάσσιας περιοχής της Τουρκίας θα περιοριστούν σε 41 χιλιάδες χλμ και επομένως θα χάσει αυτή 148 χιλιάδες χλμ”.

Ο Τούρκος αντιναύαρχος στο ίδιο σύγγραμμα αναφέρει ακόμη ότι τα 3 τρις δολάρια φυσικού αερίου, που βρέθηκαν στην ανατολική Μεσόγειο αρκούν στην Τουρκία για 572 χρόνια και στην ευρωπαϊκή ήπειρο για 30 χρόνια.

ΠΗΓΕΣ: ΚΥΠΕ (Άννα Ανδρέου), HELLAS JOURNAL
ΡΩΤΑΜΕ:
ΕΧΕΙ ΠΕΡΑΣΕΙ ΕΝΑΣ ΜΗΝΑΣ, ΑΠΟ ΤΟΤΕ ΠΟΥ ΕΜΕΙΣ ΕΔΩ ΓΡΑΨΑΜΕ ΤΟ ΙΔΙΟ, (ΟΠΩΣ ΑΥΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΑΝΑΦΕΡΕΙ Η ΠΡΩΤΗ ΠΑΡΑΓΡΑΦΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΟΣ ΑΡΘΡΟΥ), ΩΣ ΠΡΟΤΑΣΗ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΗΝ ΔΥΣΗ / Η.Π.Α., ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΔΙΕΥΘΕΤΗΣΗ ΟΜΩΣ, ΟΧΙ ΤΩΝ ΑΟΖ, ΑΛΛΑ ΤΟΥ ΘΕΜΑΤΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΥΦΑΛΟΚΡΗΠΙΔΟΣ, ΜΕΤΑΞΥ ΕΛΛΑΔΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑΣ, ΩΣΤΕ ΝΑ ΑΠΟΦΕΥΧΘΕΙ Η ΕΤ ΠΟΛΕΜΙΚΗ ΣΥΓΚΡΟΥΣΗ, ΠΟΥ ΘΑ ΤΡΑΥΜΑΤΙΖΕ ΚΑΙΡΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΝΑ ΠΤΕΡΥΓΑ ΤΟΥ ΝΑΤΟ ΚΑΙ ΕΥΡΥΤΕΡΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΜΥΝΑ ΤΗΣ ΔΥΣΗΣ; ΓΙΑ ΠΕΙΤΕ ΜΟΥ!..
5. 

Türkiye harekete geçti! Kıbrıs Rum Kesimi’nde büyük panik

2 aydır Doğu Akdeniz’deki Baf açıklarında faaliyet yürüten “Fatih sondaj gemisi ile Limasol’un güneyinde bulunan “Barbaros Hayreddin Paşa” sismik araştırma gemisinin ardından Türkiye’nin ikinci sondaj gemisi Yavuz”‘u da bölgeye göndermesi, Güney Kıbrıs Rum Kesimi’ni endişeye itti.

09 Temmuz 2019

Rum basını, Türkiye, Yavuz’un Karpaz’a gelmesiyle Kıbrıs’ı çevreledi” manşetini attı. Gazeteler,volta atma“, “kuşatma” ve “Ada etrafında Türk üçgeni” yorumlarına yer verdi. Türk sondaj ve araştırma gemilerinin güvenliğinin, 9 insansız hava aracı, savaş gemileri ve denizaltılarla sağlandığı ifade edildi.

Gazeteler ayrıca, Cumhurbaşkanı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan‘ın, Doğu Akdeniz’deki sondaj faaliyetleri konusunda kararlı olduğuna dikkat çekti.

 

ω

Türkiye yeni emrivakiler yaratıyor

Çalışmalarla ilgili Rum Başkanlık Sarayı’ndan yapılan açıklamada ise,Türkiye tarafından egemenlik haklarımızın tekrarlanan ihlaller tırmandırılıyor. Türkiye, uluslararası hukuka aykırı ve Avrupa Birliği’ni dikkate almadan bölgede yeni emrivakiler yaratıyor ifadeleri kullanıldı.

Rum Yönetimi de Türkiye’yi, Kıbrıs sorununda BM kararları temelinde diyaloğa çağırdı.

 

6.  

Türkiye‘den ABD’ye S-400 uyarısı

Dışişleri Bakanlığı Sözcüsü Hami Aksoy, “ABD Dışişleri Bakanlığı Sözcüsünün S-400 hava savunma sistemi tedariğimiz hakkında yaptığı açıklama Sayın Cumhurbaşkanımız ile ABD Başkanı Trump’ın G-20 Zirvesi sırasında gerçekleştirdikleri görüşmenin içeriği ve ruhuyla bağdaşmamaktadır” dedi.

 10-07-2019
Dışişleri Bakanlığı Sözcüsü AksoyABD Dışişleri Bakanlığı Sözcüsü Morgan Ortagus‘un, dün Türkiye’nin Rusya’dan alacağı S-400 hava savunma sistemi tedariğine ilişkin yaptığı açıklamalarla ilgili soruya yazılı cevap verdi. Aksoy, ABD tarafını diplomasi ve diyaloğu dışlayarak ilişkilere zarar verecek yanlış adımlar atmaktan kaçınmaya davet ettiklerini söyleyerek, şöyle dedi:

“ABD Dışişleri Bakanlığı Sözcüsünün S-400 hava savunma sistemi tedariğimiz hakkında yaptığı açıklama Sayın Cumhurbaşkanımız ile ABD Başkanı Trump’ın G-20 Zirvesi sırasında gerçekleştirdikleri görüşmenin içeriği ve ruhuyla bağdaşmamaktadır. Türkiye’yi S-400 tedarik etmeye sevk eden koşullar ortadadır. Başkan Trump da G-20 Zirvesi’nde bunu teyit etmiş ve ülkemize adil muamele yapılmadığını açıkça belirtmiştir. Biz sürecin başından beri bu konuyu şeffaf bir şekilde yürüttük. ABD’nin S-400 sisteminin F-35 sistemlerine zarar verebileceği konusundaki endişelerini gidermek üzere NATO’nun da dâhil edilebileceği teknik bir çalışma grubu kurulmasını önerdik; ancak bu teklifimize halen yanıt alamadık.”

 

ΠΟΛΥ ΜΠΕΡΔΕΜΕΝΗ Η ΔΗΛΩΣΗ ΣΑΣ ΑΥΤΗ Κε Ακσόϋ ΚΑΙ ΚΑΘΟΛΟΥşeffaf!

ΠΑΡΤΕ ΤΟ ΑΛΛΙΩΣ“!

 

ΣΤΟΥΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟΥΣ ΡΕ ΤΟΥΡΚΟΙ, ΓΙΑΤΙ ΔΕΝ ΔΙΝΕΤΕ ΚΑΜΙΑ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΗ, ΑΝΑΜΕΙΚΤΗ ΜΕ ΑΠΕΙΛΗ ή ΑΠΕΙΛΕΣ; Α ΡΕ ΘΡΑΣΙΜΙΑ!..

 

ΕΜΕΙΣ ΠΑΝΤΩΣ, ΧΑΚΑΝ, ΣΑΣ ΕΝΗΜΕΡΩΣΑΜΕ ΛΕΠΤΟΜΕΡΩΣ, ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΤΙ ΑΚΡΙΒΩΣ ΘΑ ΠΑΘΕΤΕ ΑΠΟ ΤΙΣ Η.Π.Α., ΑΝ -ΛΕΜΕ ΑΝ- ΠΑΡΕΤΕ S-400! ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΟ ΑΡΘΡΟ ΓΡΑΨΑΜΕ, ΔΕΝ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΛΟΓΙΚΑ ΝΑ ΕΧΕΙΣ ΠΑΡΑΠΟΝΟ!..

 

7. 

Canlı yayında rest: Kararı Türkiye verir, kimsenin konuşmaya hakkı yok!

Dışişleri Bakanı Mevlüt Çavuşloğlu basın toplantısı düzenledi. Doğu Akdeniz’deki gerilime dair çok net konuşan Çavuşoğlu, “Kıta sahanlığında ne yapmak istediğine ancak Türkiye karar verir. Garantör olmayan ülkelerin konuşmaya hakkı yoktur. Garantör ülkeler dışındaki açıklamalar yersizdir. Konuşacaklarsa da tarafsız olmak zorundalar. AB ülkeleri dayanışma adına tamamen Rum yanlısı bir tutum izliyor” dedi.

 10-07-2019
Irak Dışişleri Bakanı Muhammed Ali el-Hekim, Savunma Bakanı Necah eş-Şammari ve Ulusal İstihbarat Başkanı Mustafa el-Kazimi, Dışişleri Bakanlığında Dışişleri Bakanı Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu, Milli Savunma Bakanı Hulusi Akar, Milli İstihbarat Teşkilatı (MİT) Başkanı Hakan Fidan’dan oluşan heyetle bir araya geldi. Irak heyeti görüşmeler sonrası bakanlıktan ayrıldı.
İki ülke arasındaki görüşme sonrası Dışişleri Bakanı Mevlüt Çavuşloğlu basın toplantısı düzenledi.

Çavuşoğlu’nun açıklamalarından satır başları şöyle;

Irak’tan PKK‘nın temizlenmesi, DEAŞ ve diğer terör örgütlerine karşı neler yapabiliriz bunu değerlendirdik. Bu çerçevede ortak bir komite kurma kararı aldık. Bu formatta Bağdat’ta bir kez daha görüşme konusunda hemfikir olduk. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan bu yılın son çeyreğinde Irak’a gidecek.

DOĞU AKDENİZ MESELESİ: KONUŞMAYA HAKLARI YOK

Türkiye‘nin egemenlik hakkıdır. Hiç kimsenin yorum yapma hakkı yoktur. Kıta sahanlığında ne yapmak istediğine ancak Türkiye karar verir. Uluslararası hukuka uygun adım atıyoruz. Herkes Türkiye’nin haklarına saygı duymalıdır. Sondaj çalışmalarımızı sürdüreceğiz. Fatih gemimizden sonra Yavuz gemimiz de bölgeye gitti ve bu bölgede sondaj çalışmalarını başlatacak.

2011 yılında o günkü Cumhurbaşkanı Eroğlu’nun da bir teklifi olmuştur. BMçatısı altında bir ortak komisyon kuralım ve müştereken bu paylaşımın nasıl olacağına birlikte karar verelim ondan sonra sondaj ve faaliyetler devam etsin demişti. KKTC‘nin bu teklifi masadadır, hiçbir zaman da geri çekilmemiştir. Hiçbir kurum bu konuda adım atmamıştır. Ya zenginlikler hakça paylaşılır, ortak çözüm bulunur ya da Türkiye olarak KKTC’nin haklarını savunmaya devam edeceğiz. Garantör olmayan ülkelerin konuşmaya hakkı yoktur. Garantör ülkeler dışındaki açıklamalar yersizdir. Konuşacaklarsa da tarafsız olmak zorundalar. AB ülkeleri dayanışma adına tamamen Rum yanlısı bir tutum izliyor.

ΤΟΥΡΚΟΙ!

ΔΕΝ ΥΠΑΡΧΕΙ ΚΑΜΙΑ “ΤΔΒΚ”! ΥΠΑΡΧΕΙ ΔΙΚΗ ΣΑΣ ΕΙΣΒΟΛΗ ΚΑΙ ΚΑΤΟΧΗ ΤΟΥ ΣΧΕΔΟΝ 40% ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΓΝΩΡΙΣΜΕΝΗΣ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΩΣ “ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑΣ“! 

ΓΙΑ “ΝΑ ΜΠΕΙΤΕ ΣΤΟ ΚΟΛΠΟ”, ΘΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΛΥΘΕΙ ΤΟ “ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΟ” ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑ ΚΑΙ ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΝΑ ΡΥΘΜΙΣΤΕΙ ΤΟ ΜΕΤΑΞΥ ΜΑΣ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑ, ΑΥΤΟ “ΤΗΣ ΟΡΙΟΘΕΤΗΣΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΥΦΑΛΟΚΡΗΠΙΔΟΣ“!.. 

ΜΕ ΚΑΘΑΡΑ “ΤΣΑΜΠΟΥΚΑΔΕΣ… ΣΥΜΒΟΛΙΣΜΟΥ”, ΣΑΝ ΑΥΤΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΚΑΝΕΤΕ ΤΩΡΑ ΣΤΑ ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΑ ΝΕΡΑ, ΑΝΤΙ ΓΙΑ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑ, ΘΑ ΠΑΡΕΤΕ ΤΕΛΙΚΑ… ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΕΘΝΕΙΣ… ΟΡΧΕΙΣ!..

ΑΚΟΜΑ ΥΠΕΡΙΣΧΥΟΥΝ “ΕΙΡΗΝΙΚΕΣ ΦΩΝΕΣ” ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ, ΑΛΛΑ ΚΑΜΙΑ ΦΟΡΑ ΔΕΝ ΞΕΡΕΙΣ ΤΙ ΜΠΟΡΕΙ ΝΑ ΓΙΝΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΒΡΕΘΕΙΤΕ ΠΡΟ ΔΥΣΑΡΕΣΤΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΜΗ ΕΠΙΘΥΜΗΤΩΝ ΕΚΠΛΗΞΕΩΝ! ΜΗΝ ΠΟΛΥΓΑΒΓΙΖΕΤΕ ΣΥΝΕΧΩΣ ΛΟΙΠΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΜΗΝ ΒΑΣΙΖΕΣΤΕ ΤΟΣΟ ΣΤΟΥΣ ΑΓΓΛΟΥΣ, ΟΥΤΕ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΟΝ “ΕΡΧΟΜΟ” ΤΟΥ ΤΟΥΡΚΟ-ΓΕΝΟΥΣ ΚΟΥ… ΤΖΟΝΣΟΝ!

ΣΚΕΦΤΕΙΤΕ ΣΟΒΑΡΑ ΕΠΙΤΕΛΟΥΣ ΟΤΙ ΤΟ 2023 ΕΡΧΕΤΑΙ!.. 

S-400

S-400’lerin ne zaman geleceği nereye konuşlanacağı konuşuluyor. S-400 bitmiş bir anlaşmadır. S-400’lerin nereye konuşlanacağı askerlerin işi. Biz Dışişleri olarak üzerimize düşeni yapıyoruz. Önümüzdeki günlerde Milli Savunma Bakanlığı gerekli teknik açıklamaları sizlerle paylaşacaktır.

(ΤΑ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΑ ΤΟΥΡΚΟΙ ΘΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΕΛΘΟΥΝ ΠΡΙΝ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΕΠΕΤΕΙΟ ΤΟΥ ΚΙΝΗΜΑΤΟΣ”, ΩΣΤΕ ΝΑ ΓΙΟΡΤΑΣΕΤΕ ΜΑΖΙ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΟΛΗ ΤΟΥ ΓΚΙΟΥΛΕΝ(Ο)ΚΙΝΗΜΑΤΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΡΑΛΑΒΗ ΤΩΝ S-400 ΚΑΙ ΜΑΛΙΣΤΑ ΝΑ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΙΑΣΕΙ O ΡTE ΤΟΥΣ ΠΥΡΑΥΛΟΥΣ, ΣΕ ΜΙΑ ΙΔΙΟΤΥΠΗ… “AÇİLİŞ TÖRENİ”! ΘΕΛΕΤΕ ΜΗΠΩΣ ΝΑ ΠΑΡΟΥΜΕ ΚΑΝΕΝΑ ΤΗΛ-ΝΟ ΤΟΝ ΠΟΥΤΙΝ ΝΑ ΤΟΥ ΤΟ ΖΗΤΗΣΟΥΜΕ; “ΑΛΛΑΞΤΕ ΠΛΕΥΡΟ” ΤΩΡΑ, ΤΟΥΡΚΟΙ)!

IRAK’LA ASKERİ İŞ BİRLİĞİ TOPLANTISI

PKK’nın tüm Irak’tam temizlenmesinde mutabık kaldık. Sadece Sincar yetmez. Burada sadece Bağdat’ın değil Erbil ve Süleymaniye‘nin de işin içinde olması gerekiyor. Terör örgütleri en çok Kürt halkına zarar veriyor.

MİLLİ SAVUNMA BAKANLIĞI YENİ GÖRÜNTÜLER PAYLAŞTI

Bakanlık tarafından paylaşılan fotoğrafların altına, “Deniz Kuvvetlerimize ait gemilerimiz ve hava vasıtalarımız Yavuz ve Fatih Sondaj Gemimiz ile Barbaros Hayreddin Paşa Sismik Araştırma Gemimize refakat etmeyi sürdürüyor” açıklaması eklendi.

8. 

Miçotakis‘in Türkiye ajandası

10-07-2019

Yunanistan’da Çipras dönemi kapandı, başbakanlık koltuğuna Kiriakos Miçotakis oturdu.

Bu değişim, Türkiye ilişkilerine nasıl yansır?

Özellikle Çipras’ın son dönemindeki Türkiye ile gerginlik içeren politikalarda bir değişiklik olur mu?

İki ülke arasındaki en önemli kriz başlığı Doğu Akdeniz ve Kıbrıs.

Bu konuda Miçotakis’in Çipras’tan daha ılıman olması beklenmiyor ama şu bir gerçek ki YunanistanTürkiye ilişiklerine yön verecek en önemli etken Yunanistan’ın ekonomisi.

Miçotakis ekonomik beklentiler sonucu seçim kazanan bir lider.

Çipras ağır ekonomik şartlar altındaydı ve Makedonya meselesinde de ciddi kan kaybına uğramıştı.

AB ile imzaladığı mali disiplin anlaşması nedeniyle AB’nin politik söylemlerinin de etkisi altındaydı.

Miçotakis Makedonya meselesinde Çipras’a göre daha avantajlı pozisyonda.

Mali disiplin konusunda AB’ye bağımlılık bu yeni dönemde de devam edecek olsa da ekonomik krizin ağır faturasının büyük bölümü Çipras döneminde ödendi.

Bu bağlamda Miçotakis AB’nin ağır mali boyunduruğundan kurtulduğu ölçüde, AB politikalarının yanında kendi politik duruşunu sergileme imkanını bulabilecektir.

Türkiye-Yunanistan ilişkilerinin en büyük şifresi aslında Yunanistan ekonomisi.

Yunan uzmanlar en önemli ticari partnerleriinin Türkiye olduğunu vurguluyor.

Miçotakis ağır krizin faturasının ödenmeye başladığı bir dönemde Yunanistan’ın başbakanı oldu ve ekonomik vaatlerle ön plana çıktı.

Bu vaatlerini gerçekleştirirken ticari konularda Türkiye ile birlikte hareket etmek onun elini kolaylaştıracaktır.

Ekonomi konusu bu anlamda Yunanistan-Türkiye ilişkilerinin iyileşmesi adına bir anahtar değeri taşıyor.

Ancak ortada çok ciddi bir sorun var, Doğu Akdeniz-Kıbrıs meselesi.

Çipras bu konuda ne kadar şahinse Miçotakis’in de öyle olacağından şüphe yok.

Çipras’ın ilk yıllarındaki Türkiye ile ılıman ilişkiler, Doğu Akdeniz doğalgazında safların belirgin hale gelmesiyle daha gergin bir hal aldı.

Yeni başbakan Miçotakis’in bu gerginliği sona erdirecek hamlelerde bulunması ise uzak ihtimal olarak görülüyor.

Türkiye’nin Doğu Akdeniz’deki faaliyetleriyle ilgili Çipras AB’den yardım istemiş ve Türkiye’ye yönelik yaptırım talebinde bulunmuştu.

Yunanistan’daki seçim öncesi Miçotakis de benzer şekilde Türkiye’ye yönelik AB’nin adım atması gerektiğini savunmuştu.

AB, Türkiye’ye karşı herhangi bir yaptırımda bulunabilir ya da bulunamaz orası ayrı ama ortadaki veriler Çipras dönemindeki Doğu Akdeniz gerginliğinin Miçotakis’le devam edeceğini gösteriyor.

Miçotakis özellikle ekonomik sözlerini yerine getirmeye çalışırken Türkiye ile iyi ilişkiler kurma zorunluluğunu hissedecek.

Doğu Akdeniz-Kıbrıs problemi ise kalıcı görünüyor.

Ekonomik ihtiyaçlardan doğan Türkiye ile ticari ilişkiler, Doğu Akdeniz problemi devam etse de tansiyonun zaman zaman düşme ihtimalini de beraberinde getiriyor.

Miçotakis bu gerginliği azaltmayı isteyecektir.

Ancak bilhassa milliyetçi oylarla seçim kazandığını hesaba katacak olursak bunu yaparken işinin zor olduğu da ayrı bir gerçek.

Meseleye Türkiye penceresinden bakınca ise Türkiye’nin komşusu Yunanistan’a elinden gelen özveriyi gösterdiğini görüyoruz.

Kıbrıs konusunda Yunanistan’ın garantörlüğüne saygı duyan, Doğu Akdeniz’deki doğalgaz rezervlerinde kim hangi yasa dışı masayı kurmuş olursa olsun, kendi uluslararası haklarını gasp ettirmemek adına tüm tehditlere rağmen faaliyetlerini sürdüren ve bu konuda geri adım atmayan bir Türkiye var.

Karşı tarafın her türlü agresif tutumuna rağmen komşusu Yunanistan’ı bulunduğu ölçekte değerlendirip, ona göre tutum sergileyen bir Türkiye var.

Çipras’la iyiyken iyi, agresifken aynı ölçüde agresif olan bir Türkiye gördük.

Miçotakis de nasıl yaklaşırsa o denli karşılık alacaktır, Türkiye’den.

Neticede seçim oldu, kazanan tarafı Başkan Erdoğan arayıp, tebrik etti. Erdoğan yeni dönemde temennilerini de dile getirdi.

Türkiye’nin bu davranışı, Yunanistan’dan “ille de” dostluk beklentisinden ziyade ne kadar dostluksa, “benden de o kadar” demektir.

Ve bu anlamda ilk adımı atan taraf olmaktır.

ΠΟΣΟ ΑΝΕΞΑΡΤΗΤΑ ΓΡΑΦΕΙΣ ΡΕ ΦΙΛΑΡΑΚΟ Ταχά;

ΕΙΔΙΚΑ ΤΟ 1ο ΣΟΥ ΜΙΣΟ ΜΟΙΑΖΕΙ ΠΟΛΥ “ΣΤΗΜΕΝΟ”, ΛΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΘΕΣ ΝΑ ΜΑΣ ΠΕΙΣΕΙΣ “ΕΝΑ ΠΡΑΓΜΑ“!..  

 

9.

undefined

undefined

undefined

undefined

Arnavutluk Genelkurmay Başkanı Tuğgeneral Bardhyl KOLLÇAKU’nun Genelkurmay Başkanı Orgeneral Yaşar GÜLER’i Ziyareti.

Genelkurmay Başkanı Orgeneral Yaşar GÜLER, resmî davetlisi olarak Ankara’da bulunan Arnavutluk Genelkurmay Başkanı Tuğgeneral Bardhyl KOLLÇAKU‘yu askeri törenle karşıladı. Törenin ardından iki komutan Genelkurmay Karargâhında görüşme gerçekleştirdi.

ΣΤΕΛΝΟΥΜΕ ΤΟΥΣ ΘΕΡΜΟΥΣ ΠΡΟΣΩΠΙΚΟΥΣ ΧΑΙΡΕΤΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΜΑΣ ΣΤΟΝ ΦΙΛΟ ΜΑΣ ΜΠΑΡΤΙΛ!..ΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΜΙΑ ΣΩΣΤΗ ΕΠΙΛΟΓΗ ΤΟΥ ΑΛΒΑΝΟΥ ΕΛΛΗΝΟ-ΓΕΝΙΤΣΑΡΟΥ ΑΡΧΙ-ΜΑΦΙΟΖΟΥ Π-Θ ΕΝΤΙ ΡΑΜΑ!

 

10. 

ABD’den sert açıklama: İran‘a asla izin vermeyeceğiz

Konuşmasında ABD’nin, İran’la nükleer programı hakkında konuşmaya açık olduğunu ve savaş istemediğini belirten Pence, Trump yönetiminin de ABD’nin çıkarlarını ve vatandaşlarını korumaya hazır olduğuna değindi.

Pence konuşmasında şu ifadeleri kullandı: “İran, ABD’nin kendini kontrol altında tutmasını, kararsızlıkla karıştırmamalı. İran’ın yarattığı kötü etkiye karşı çıkmaya devam edeceğiz, ekonomisine baskı uygulamaya devam edeceğiz ve İran’ın asla nükleer bir silaha sahip olmasına izin vermeyeceğiz”.

 

11. Μόλις προχθές, λέγαμε… γράφοντας στον Χακάν ΦΙΝΤΑΝ να σταματήσει να βάζει φωτιές στην χώρα μας και συγκεκριμένα είχαμε αναφερθεί στην Εύβοια, στην “ΜΟΤΟΡ ΟΙΛ” και στην Ηλεία! Δεν μας άκουσε και έτσι σήμερα (10-07-2019) έχουμε και πάλι φωτιές στην Εύβοια (Πευκί), στους Αγίους Θεοδώρους, αλλά και στα Τρίκαλα και περί την Δίρβη, Φθιώτιδος!.. 

– Είναι πια φανερό, όπως δηλώνει και η φωτιά στα Τρίκαλα, όχι ότι από πίσω από τις φωτιές είναι η ΜΙΤ, αφού αυτό είναι δεδομένο και αποδεδειγμένο, αλλά ότι οι τ/ΜΥ έχουν στρατολογήσει Αλβανούς Μουσουλμάνους, οι οποίοι σήμερα βάζουν φωτιές, αύριο θα κάνουν κάτι άλλο, κλπ, κλπ, κλπ!.. Τα Τρίκαλα πρόδωσαν τις… Τ-Α σχέσεις, αφού το Περτούλι / Τρικάλων έχει -κατά καιρούς- χρησιμοποιηθεί από ένοπλους Αλβανούς, ως χώρος ασκήσεών τους, με “ΚΑΛΑΣΝΙΚΩΦ”, κλπ, όπως -αν θυμάστε- και παλαιότερα τα ορεινά Καλάβρυτα, η ορεινή περιοχή των Καλαβρύτων, όπου και εκεί ασκούντο Αλβανοί, οι οποίοι μάλιστα φωτογραφίζονταν με μαντήλια στα πρόσωπά τους, να πυροβολούν, και πάλι με “ΚΑΛΑΣΝΙΚΩΦ”, μια ελληνική σημαία, αλλά και η περιοχή του ΜΑΙΝΑΛΟΥ, όπου ασκούντο και εκεί, αναλόγως, Τσετσένοι Μουσουλμάνοι, μαζί (και) με Αλβανούς ομοίους τους !.. 

ΞΑΝΑΛΕΜΕ, και μάλιστα εμφαντικά, στους φίλους Αλβανούς, και όχι στους Τουρκαλβανούς ή όποιους άλλους, με οποιοδήποτε πρόθεμα εμπρός από την λέξη “Αλβανός”, να “μαζέψουν”, διότι μπορούν(!), όλους τους στην Ελλάδα ευρισκόμενους Αλβανούς… εξτρεμιστές, οι οποίοι ΠΡΟΣΒΑΛΛΟΥΝ με την στάση τους (sic) βάναυσα τον ιδρώτα της τεράστιας πλειοψηφίας των έντιμων Αλβανών μεταναστατών – εργαζομένων στην χώρα μας!.. 

–  Για όλες τις περιοχές που σήμερα εκάησαν, έχουμε εξηγήσει! Για την περιοχή της Δίβρης το εξετάζουμε! Πάντως εκεί έχει πολλούς Αλβανούς, οι οποίοι θεωρούν ότι η περιοχή είναι “καθαρά” Αλβανική, αφού έχουν, όπως λένε, ΠΡΟΣΕΞΤΕ Δίβρη (Ντιμπάρ) και στην χώρα τους!.. Οι περισσότεροι εκεί (στην Ντιμπάρ ΒΑ Αλβανία) ήσαν, τουλάχιστον μέχρι πριν από λίγα χρόνια, οπαδοί του Μπερίσα. 

Οι φωτιές, μαζί με την εσχάτως εκκινήσασα νέα τακτική “Μαστίγιο και Καρότο” στην Α. Μεσόγειο, είναι τουρκικό… δώρο και ταυτόχρονο δοκιμαστικό… “τεστ”, προς τον νέο μας Π-Θ, Κο Κ.Μ., “άμα τη εμφανίσει του”, όχι στο Ταμείο, όπως λέμε, αλλά στην θέση του Ε/Π-Θ!.. (Τέτοια τ/τακτική, δεν εφαρμόστηκε ποτέ, επί Τσίπρα).

12.

In an astonishing turn, George Soros and Charles Koch team up to end US ‘forever war’ policy

By Stephen Kinzer 

Updated June 30, 2019

George Soros (left) and Charles Koch are teaming up on the effort.

George Soros (left) and Charles Koch are teaming up on the effort.(ASSOCIATED PRESS/FILE PHOTOS)

BESIDES BEING BILLIONAIRES and spending much of their fortunes to promote pet causes, the leftist financier George Soros and the right-wing Koch brothers have little in common. They could be seen as polar opposites. Soros is an old-fashioned New Deal liberal. The Koch brothers are fire-breathing right-wingers who dream of cutting taxes and dismantling government. Now they have found something to agree on: the United States must end its “forever war” and adopt an entirely new foreign policy.

In one of the most remarkable partnerships in modern American political history, Soros and Charles Koch, the more active of the two brothers, are joining to finance a new foreign-policy think tank in Washington. It will promote an approach to the world based on diplomacy and restraint rather than threats, sanctions, and bombing. This is a radical notion in Washington, where every major think tank promotes some variant of neocon militarism or liberal interventionism. Soros and Koch are uniting to revive the fading vision of a peaceable United States. The street cred they bring from both ends of the political spectrum — along with the money they are providing — will make this new think tank an off-pitch voice for statesmanship amid a Washington chorus that promotes brinksmanship.

“This is big,” said Trita Parsi, former president of the National Iranian American Council and a co-founder of the new think tank. “It shows how important ending endless war is if they’re willing to put aside their differences and get together on this project. We are going to challenge the basis of American foreign policy in a way that has not been done in at least the last quarter-century.”

The institute plans to open its doors in September and hold an official inauguration later in the autumn. Its founding donors — Soros’s Open Society Foundation and the Charles Koch Foundation — have each contributed half a million dollars to fund its takeoff. A handful of individual donors have joined to add another $800,000. By next year the institute hopes to have a $3.5 million budget and a staff of policy experts who will churn out material for use in Congress and in public debates. Hiring is underway. Among Parsi’s co-founders are several well-known critics of American foreign policy, including Suzanne DiMaggio, who has spent decades promoting negotiated alternatives to conflict with China, Iran, and North Korea; the historian and essayist Stephen Wertheim; and the anti-militarist author and retired Army colonel Andrew Bacevich.

“The Quincy Institute will invite both progressives and anti-interventionist conservatives to consider a new, less militarized approach to policy,” Bacevich said, when asked why he signed up. “We oppose endless, counterproductive war. We want to restore the pursuit of peace to the nation’s foreign policy agenda.”

In concrete terms, this means the Quincy Institute will likely advocate a withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan and Syria; a return to the nuclear deal with Iran; less confrontational approaches to Russia and China; an end to regime-change campaigns against Venezuela and Cuba; and sharp reductions in the defense budget.

It aims to issue four reports before the end of 2019: two offering alternative approaches to the Middle East and East Asia, one on “ending endless war,” and one called “democratizing foreign policy.” Its statement of principles asserts that the United States “should engage with the world, and the essence of engagement is peaceful cooperation among peoples. For this reason, the United States must cherish peace and pursue it through the vigorous practice of diplomacy . . . The use of armed force does not represent American engagement in the world. Force ends human life, destroying engagement irreparably. Any resort to force should occur only as a last resort and should remain infrequent. The military exists to defend the people and territory of the United States, not to act as a global police force.”

The depth of this heresy can only be appreciated by recognizing the meretricious power that nourishes Washington’s think-tank ecosystem. These “talk shops” employ experts who pop up to advise politicians, journalists, Congressional staff members, and the public. They write opinion columns and bloviate on news channels. In foreign policy, all major Washington think tanks promote interventionist dogma: the United States faces threats everywhere, it must therefore be present everywhere, and “present” includes maintaining more than 800 foreign military bases and spending trillions of dollars on endless confrontations with foreign countries. That, with some variation, is the ethos that moves conservative think tanks like the American Enterprise Institute and the Heritage Foundation as well as liberal ones like the Center for American Progress and the Brookings Institution. Just as pernicious as their relentless support of the global-hegemony project is the corruption that lies behind it. Many Washington think tanks are supported by industries and foreign powers eager to inflate threats in order shape American law, policy, and public opinion. Their “experts” are often paid shills who cloak themselves in institutional respectability so they can masquerade as independent analysts.

When foreign crises like the war in Yemen break out, critics of US policy emerge and are given space to air their views. These protests, however, are episodic. Little continuity ties one burst of outrage to the next. The Quincy Institute aims to offer a corps of experts in Washington who will promote a unified foreign-policy paradigm based on statecraft and cooperation. Its founders plan to become involved in grass-roots campaigns, especially in minority communities. They hope their specialists will eventually move on to populate Congressional staffs and the executive branch — as alumni of pro-intervention think tanks have been doing for decades.

“Some interesting currents are emerging in American politics and we want to capture this moment, but we’re in it for the long haul,” said Parsi. “We’ll be a failure if in 10 years we’re still criticizing. In 10 years, we want to be driving the bus.”

Correction: An earlier version of this column said the Koch brothers are financing the Quincy Institute. Only one of the brothers, Charles, is backing the think tank.

Stephen Kinzer is a senior fellow at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University.

13. 

A MORAL PHILOSOPHER’S LETTER TO PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU

Leading the most beleaguered state on earth against the greatest threat to civilization.

Jason D. Hill is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and professor of philosophy at DePaul University in Chicago. He is the author of several books, including “We Have Overcome: An Immigrant’s Letter to the American People.”

Dear Prime Minister Netanyahu,

I write to you as an admirer; as a moral philosopher, and as an immigrant to America from Jamaica where part of my ancestral bloodline can be traced to a maternal great-grandfather who was a Sephardic Jew, and whose people came to Jamaica from Jerusalem via Portugal.

Your name as you know, means, “Given by God.” And so you have been offered up to  your people in historic Supreme leadership in your unprecedented role in serving as fifth-term Prime Minister of Israel. You hail from the line of the first three great Patriarchs of Israel and, like the first, Abraham, you have been singled out by God to lead your great state and exceptional civilization. Unlike Abraham, you do not have to flee your homeland. You only have to defend it ruthlessly and intransigently and, with moral implacability, protect it by any means necessary against those who have sworn your people as their eternal enemies, and who have codified in their charters a Jihadist roadmap to the destruction of your country and your people.  Like Abraham’s people, many of God’s chosen people have yet to accommodate themselves to you and your prophetic role as an historic figure. You, the patriarch of Israel, are a mouthpiece of the dead and a living producer of victories yet to come.

Jews have had a 3,300 year presence in the land of Israel. In your heroic years ahead, and in your historic fifth term as Prime of Israel, the task of preserving that homeland lies in the unyielding grip of your hands.  As much of Europe grows more anti-Semitic with each passing year and, as that most racist of institutions, The United Nations, along with Europe seem to stamp their moral approval upon the terrorist organizations of Hamas and the Palestinian Authority, you face a lonely and daunting task in decisions you will  make in the self-defense of your country. You will, undoubtedly, act unilaterally and defiantly at times, and toss international approval where it belongs: into the dustbin where stale, musky racist detritus resides, and where the moral grammar of rights are not really up for grabs—they have been allocated to your sworn enemies while your state is deemed worthy of none. Indeed, when the United Nations tries to shame your country for defending itself against war crimes committed by Hamas by declaring that you ought to share your Iron Dome defense technology with the very terror group trying to kill your citizens, then there is now lower and egregiously shameful space of moral degradation that the United Nations can occupy. Let the world remember that Hamas has repeatedly shot more than 9,000 missiles and mortar rockets into Israel from Gaza since your state withdrew military forces from there in 2005.

What the world is witnessing, Prime Minister, when it watches the Palestinian war against Israel is a clash of Manifest Destinies. Those Manifest Destinies are irreconcilable. What few fail to realize is that the Manifest Destinies of both societies are morally and, a fortiori, logically irreconcilable. The Manifest Destiny of the invented Palestinian people is an iteration of the larger Arab and Iranian world view. It is expansionist, annihilatory, predatory and has, as a constitutive feature of its political identity, a belief that Jews in the region are a non-negotiable foreign entity that, one way or another, must be obliterated. Written into its political DNA is hatred of the Jews as Jews, and a view of Israel as an artificial and illegitimate creation that must be dissolved as a necessary consideration for the total and uncompromising freedom of the Palestinian people. That is their Final Solution!

The establishment of a Global Islamic Caliphate, and the concomitant animus towards Jews that is its logical derivative is a constitutive feature of Pan-Arab national, moral and political  identity. Peace is impossible because proximity to Jews and the mere existence of Israel are non-negotiable facts that the Palestinians cannot abide by. The hard truth is that the peace offerors—Israeli political actors—have failed to recognize that in the minds of Palestinian leaders and their supporters, their emancipation is inexorably linked to Jewish annihilation in the Middle East and, for some of the more radical extremists, in the world. This is a fundamentally nihilistic and misanthropic ideology because it is one that requires the destruction of a democratic and civilized state and its people in order for another group of people to exist.

The Manifest Destiny of Israel is to claim its historic homeland, to continue to build a thriving civilization in what was once an uncultivated desert with deterrent swamps, and to cultivate a region that before her arrival existed largely outside the historical process—a disparate unit of tribes with no participation in the making of a universal history. Israel’s Manifest Destiny is one rooted in a philosophy of self-containment that is linked to the can-do entrepreneurial, creative and innovative spirit of her people. Israel’s Manifest Destiny is an aspirational one, one that speaks to the Jewish people not just finding a permanent home for themselves after millennia of exilic and diasporic existence in the world. It is also an aspirational quest buttressed by a promised delivered by God to give His people a return to their home. In that milieu, Jewish moral agency comes closer to manifesting their vocational call to repair the world and, as the chosen First people of God, they more than any other religious civilization have literally known the mind of God Himself. Epistemic access to God’s mind and will are best discovered in a political state whose people were the first in monotheistic history to share an intimate and personal relationship to Him, and who were the first divine repositories and transmitters of God’s laws. Israel’s Manifest Destiny is one that is forged through a Holy covenant and signed with the moral insignia of God Himself. Jews were the first civilized people to enter into a direct conversation with God, to receive law from him, and to begin the construction of what today we call: Western Civilization.

Prime Minister, you are besieged with endless calls for peace talks and initiatives. All of these talks center around what we all now know can never be a reality: A two state solution. Any further talk about peace with the Palestinian Authority and any of its administrative bodies, and even peace brokering with Hamas, are deeply unethical.

Peace engagements are unethical for several reasons. First, having accepted that Palestinian emancipation in the minds of the PA and their supporters rests on Jewish annihilation, Israel can only act in an irrationally altruistic fashion to pretend that peace is possible. This means engaging in willful self-deception in order to placate one’s enemies at the cost of the flourishing of one’s own people. This includes and has included land swapping for peace, failure to annex the West Bank, handing over Gaza to the Palestinians, and failing to apply Israeli law unilaterally across the state of Israel.

It is unethical because it treats “war settlers,” and occupants on Israeli territory as if they are legitimate custodians of the land they claim belongs to them. They are not such custodians.  They are properly wards of the state of Jordan who instigated and lost a war against Israel. In that war, Israel rather than vanquish the enemy—which is the only proper moral end of war—failed to annex the land that was legally captured and, in return, granted political recognition to illegal settlers on conquered territory. This recognition of “war settlers” as legitimate political sovereigns required Israel to place her own rational, national self-interest below the demands made by illegal aliens now on foreign territory. Israel thus compromised her political self-esteem through decades of appeasement, placation and, at times, renunciation of her fundamental values as a Jewish state to an avowed enemy. It is bad to have enemies. It is tragic and immoral to aid and abet one’s own destroyers. To repeatedly engage in such endeavors is to publicly renounce the intrinsic value of one’s life and the state one lives in—which  is a pre-condition for one’s existence—by among other things, caring about international respectability and moral prestige at the expense of the national security of one’s country.

Prime Minister, I hope that Israel will be unphased by the international anti-Semitism that it faces daily as accusations of it as a genocidal and apartheid state become common canards among political leaders around the world. Some countries still fail to recognize Israel as a legitimate state while the United Nations legitimizes the PLO/PA terrorist organization, and the Nobel Academy awarded a Nobel Peace Prize to the terrorist mastermind behind the PLO: the late Yasser Arafat. Arafat never once abjured terror against Israel. Even European Union members Portugal, Denmark, Ireland and Finland attempted to block the European Union from condemning Hamas leaders’ call for the destruction of Israel. Until Israel accepts that worldwide political anti-Semitism is still pervasive in Europe and around much of the world, she will be constant appeasers and will seek to placate her own destroyers. The crisis within the Palestinian leadership has not only to do with the corrupt machinations of its actors. That corruption is a logical corollary of the intransigent fanaticism within the Palestinian national movement itself, and its willful intention to define by formal decree through its charters and covenants, the destruction of Israel.

Prime Minister, you and your allies may have to force Jordan to revoke its Palestinian majority citizenship laws in Jordan and relocate—at least those Palestinians in the West Bank—to Jordan. It may involve a ruthless application of increased militarization of regions occupied by Palestinians. However you choose to secure the sustained national interest of Israel, it is not your moral responsibility to burden yourself with the political or existential well-being of the Palestinian people. Stripping the Palestinians of the right to vote as a national security measure may be a good operational strategy. People who vote terrorist institutions to represent them, and whose said institutions target Israel for destruction cannot be viewed as politically mature civic- minded individuals. Their goals and the sustainability of Israel are irreconcilable. When leadership backed by terrorist agendas based on one’s annihilation are the order of the day, one need not consult the enemy on the means by which one ought best to protect oneself. However, you and your coalition government—which you will form when you sail to victory in September of this year—choose to vanquish the enemy within your nation, remains your moral prerogative.  And in a situation where one’s enemies regards your obliteration as non-negotiable, whatever means you chose to vanquish the enemy will be both expedient and morally permissible.

I have already written in a subsequent article that Israel has the moral right to annex all of the West Bank. Your heroic and ethical state fought a defensive Six Day War against Egypt, Jordan and Syria. You won that war and, in the process, reconquered the Holy lands of Judea and Samaria and East Jerusalem.  Rather than annex the area now called the West Bank immediately after the Six Day War, Israel fought an altruistic war and made the war settlers there their moral responsibility instead of re-locating them to their country which launched the war: Jordan. Similarly, Israel has every right to apply Israeli law and exercise total sovereignty over the Golan Heights. As a matter of moral fact, you have the right to apply Israeli law over every square inch of Israel.  Your country is small. It cannot shrink any more.

From a moral standpoint, permit our readers be reminded of the other two instances in which Israeli leadership, acting in good faith and benevolence and a true desire to repair the world, sought to broker a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. The 2000 Camp David Summit organized by President Clinton between then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat saw an unprecedented offer made by the Israelis to the Palestinians. They included shared sovereignty over Jerusalem which no Israeli leader had ever considered doing. Barak offered them all of Gaza, 92 percent of Judea and Samaria (West Bank) and control over the Jordan valley. Barak refused to concede to the demands of the so-called right to return which, we know with absolute certainty, would have lead to the destruction of Israel. The Palestinians rejected peace and statehood, and began massive terrorist attacks against Israel and The Second Intifada.

Again in 2008, then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert made PLO chairman and Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas an even more generous offer of peace and Palestinian statehood. Olmert acting in good faith on the belief that peace and Palestinian conflict would cease, made the following offer to Abbas: 94 percent of the West Bank (Judea and Samaria); an additional 327 square kilometers of land within sovereign Israel adjacent to the Gaza strip and northern Samaria. Additionally, he offered Palestinian sovereignty over Arab neighborhoods in Jerusalem; he offered, too, to transfer the sovereignty over the Temple Mount and sacred areas of Jerusalem’s Old City to an international body. And perhaps the most radical act of generosity made by a state attacked by foreign countries during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War against Israel, he offered a limited right of immigration to descendants of Arabs who left Israel in 1948-49! And how did Abbas respond? He waged an anti-Israel publicity campaign war on behalf of the PLO on the international level and in the United Nations. It was cited as a diplomatic response to an unacceptable offer. It was a vicious and mean-spirited attack on Israel’s moral integrity.

It is clear that the goals of the governing Palestinian bodies are to establish a Palestinian state that as Israeli journalist, Caroline Glick describes, exists “in a de facto state of war with Israel.”

Prime Minister, it is putatively obvious that the Oslo Accords were nullified and neutralized by the Second Intifada engineered by the PA and its terrorist leader, Yasser Arafat.  Israel is under no moral obligations to abide by that treaty any longer. The Oslo 1 Accord asked that each party accept the other as a negotiating partner; that the PLO recognize the state of Israel, and that Israel recognize the PLO as the representative of the Palestinians. Although it was indeed a moral concession on the part of Israel to recognize a terrorist organization as a legitimate governing body, it complied in good faith. Not the PLO.

Israel has every right to not only annex every part of the West Bank. I believe that Israel should also retake Bethlehem from Palestinian administrative control. What has the Palestinian leadership done to Bethlehem? It has decimated the Christian population. Christians made up 85% of Bethlehem’s populations in 1949 when Jordan took control of the city, and 60% in 1990. By 2009 they constituted just 12% of the population. Bethlehem has no business being under Palestinian administrative control. No part of Israel should ever be ceded to a political leadership that is politically regressive, has no concept of civil liberties, human rights or respect for the sacred inviolability of human life. The Palestinian “Pay-for-Slay” program under the auspices of the Palestinian Authority law mandates salaries for terrorists to kill American and Israeli civilians. Palestinian officials describe the terror trust fund recipients as “soldiers and sons of our nations.” If ever there was a good reason to annihilate the PA, and evict its supporters and all who endorse the program from the state of Israel—this would be it.

The nullification and neutralization by the reign of terror that was the Second Intifada has stripped the PA and its governing bodies of any moral credibility and claims to any rights. They suspended recognition of Israel and today still, by their very Charter, live by an anti-Zionist credo that is dedicated to a Palestinian homeland. What I fervently hope you will accomplish Prime Minister, is the complete demilitarization of the Palestinian Authority; to strip it of any governing rights over any part of Judea and Samaria and ultimately to destroy it completely as an internal foreign aggressor dedicated by constitutional design to obliterate your state and your people. They have no right of jurisdiction over Bethlehem, and they have no right to govern anywhere in the state of Israel. They have no such right any more than an intruder plotting your destruction would have a right to your house, let alone have the moral temerity to exercise autonomous jurisdiction over any part of your domicile.

And Gaza. How has Hamas, Iran’s proxy and surrogate in the region, and the Palestinian segment of the Muslim brotherhood movement in the region along with its citizens who voted its leadership into power repaid Israel’s unilateral withdrawal from the region? I have already pointed out the reign of terror they continue to unleash by targeting civilian populations in Israel. Hamas is at war with Israel.  And I believe that the moral goal of war is to completely vanquish the enemy. Your country has been fighting an altruistic war with Hamas for a long time, and for some, it seems as if Israel cares more about Palestinian civilians than it does for her children, women and men.

I say no more!

The next time Hamas decides to fire 450 mortar rockets and launch flaming kites and helium balloons into Israel from Gaza that destroy the farming lands of innocent Israelis and suffocate thousands of animals to death, remember that they amount to war crimes.  Let the citizens of Israel meditate on how the United States morally defeated Germany and Japan in WWII. Think about Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. When the dust has fallen remember that Egypt is contiguous with Gaza, and that Hamas has always valued its ties to Egypt and the Muslim Brotherhood there. Relocate the population to Egypt and re-settle Gaza where the ambitious and enterprising Israeli citizens will tun that now barren wasteland into a flourishing agricultural mecca, and reintroduce entrepreneurial vitality.  Those rockets and incendiary kites and helium balloons have created an ecological disaster that will take, perhaps decades, for your country to recover from. Hamas has never cared about creating a thriving economy. As a death cult, it has used the state as a war zone to kill and maim your people. You have the moral right to annihilate that war zone in the name of self-defense. No one can stop Israel from defending herself. And if anti-Semitic member states of the European Union fail to condemn Hamas’s call for the destruction of Israel and its goal of a Global Caliphate—which would see the persecution and death of apostates, Jews and Christians alike—remember that such countries are political ballasts in this issue.

It is regrettable that people simply engage in affected ignorance regarding the covenants and charters of both the PLO/PA and Hamas. The latter, they must know, calls for the destruction of Israel and the eradication of Israel as part of a global Islamic imperialist movement. The goal is the restoration of the Caliphate and institution of global Islamic domination. Quoting the Koran, Article 7 of Hamas’ charter Article 7 is taken from Hadith Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177 and quotes the Prophet Muhammad: It declares genocide of world Jewry a necessity. Hamas’ founding document is, as Caroline Glick points out, the presentation of an outline for a totalitarian movement dedicated to the obliteration of Israel in the name of Islam. It explicitly calls for the rejection of peace negotiations with Israel, and commands for a Jihad. Our readers must know that Hamas’ terrorist operatives have used terror tunnels to infiltrate Israel where they have repeatedly launched terror attacks against civilians. The Palestinian Authority’s charter calls for the explicit removal of Jewry from the region and makes it unequivocally clear that Jewish and Palestinian co-habitation are morally, existentially and logically impossible. Anti-Semitism is rooted in the political charters of governing Palestinian institutions. They are core constitutive features of their moral, political and social identities. Not one Palestinian governing body has produced anything but terrorist institutions. It is not accidental that Palestinians have only produced terrorist organizations as governing bodies to challenge Israeli sovereignty.

There is not any democratic or individual-rights respecting institution that could produce charters that call for the obliteration of Israel and Jewry. Palestinian nationalism, as opposed to the civic nationalism of liberal democracies such as Israel’s, replete with respect for individual rights, religious reciprocity and freedom of association, are anathema to such principles. Since Palestinians overwhelmingly vote for terrorist governing bodies that have as their explicit goal the annihilation of Israel and Jewry, no distinction should be made between the terrorist organizations and their deputized stand-ins and surrogates. Any attempt, therefore, to make peace with the individuals who institute such terrorist governing bodies is not only a breach in national security, but an egregious moral compromise. More than anyone else, you know that one does not negotiate the terms of one’s existence with people whose moral and political identities are predicated on the death of Jews. Jewish presence and its proximity to their existence are existentially intolerable to them. They hate you for one and one reason only, (and it is the same reason Jews have been hated for millennia): Because you are Jews.

Prime Minister, I know that against the backdrop of all this that you know in your heart and mind that a two-state solution can never be the ultimate resolution to this ongoing conflict.  For what will an independent state call for, and what will it be granted? A full-scale military and naval fleet of its own. Given the Charter of the PLO/PA, and given their record of terrorism and, against the backdrop of the First and Second Intifadas, Israel can never allow an enemy faction  replete with a full arsenal of weaponry that will undoubtedly be unleashed against the country, within its own state. You said it best Prime Minister: “If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel.”

Because of their unpardonable crimes against Israel, the Palestinian leaders and all those who support them have evicted themselves from the realm of rights.

Regarding the issue of Palestinians who vote for terrorist organizations, I re-iterate that Israel may properly regard them as national security threats. Those who renounce terrorism, the PA and Hamas, and terror as a means for fighting for the so called liberation of Palestinian land (there can be no such thing as legitimate ‘Palestinian Territory’ in a geographic region legally seized in a defensive war instigated by a foreign aggressor); those who have never been a member of a terrorist organization or pledged any allegiance to any sworn enemy of the state of Israel and who, after a thorough security vetting process, display  patriotism towards Israel, may be considered for citizenship.

You and your citizens have in the last few months celebrated two momentous achievements. The independence of the victorious 1967 Six Day War where you defeated an amalgamation of foreign aggressors united in their goals to destroy your state. You’ve also just recently celebrated the Declaration of Independence of Israel in 1948 which is really the re-founding of your lost ancestral homeland; a homeland stolen from you several times beginning in 587 BCE when Babylonian Nebuchadnezzar captured Jerusalem and destroyed the First Temple created by your sovereign King, Solomon, king of the United Kingdom of Israel and Judah. Your people were exiled to Babylon. Thereafter, your sacred land has been controlled by a phalanx of empires: Babylonians, Persians, Greek, Hellenistic, Roman, the Byzantine Empire, Islamic and Christian Crusades, the Ottoman Empire and the British.

Throughout millennia your exceptional people have prevailed as diasporic ethical heroes. Wherever you lived you always made stupendous contributions to other cultures. You arduously repaired the world as you suffused it with an original assemblage of who and what you are: an ethical people stamped with the imprimatur of God’s blessing. As I have said in my last book, “We Have Overcome,” a paean hymn to American exceptionalism, Jewish civilization is a superior and exceptionalist one as well. In no part of the world were Jews ever granted an Affirmative Action Visa to work, to excel and to make awe-inspiring contributions to world culture in all fields of knowledge. Your ancestral homeland, Israel, is the only nation blessed in the Bible by God. Several times it has been stolen from you. Today, it threatens to be destroyed by nefarious and politically primitive regimes that surround you, and by enemies inside your sovereign state who abide by charters and covenants that provide a road map for your country’s destruction.

Today you face a not insurmountable battle in the impending re-election that lies ahead.  As you reflect on your destiny, do know that God would not have appointed you to this historic role only to snatch it away in such an indecorous manner. I believe it is your will and soldierly resolve that are being tested. Your vision for a more magnificent Israel will be honed and refined and, ultimately without doubt, forged in the crucibles of the moral vision you have steadfastly made as part of your own vocational calling.

You are the only leader alive in Israel today who truly understands the nihilistic and irreversible evil of the Jihad campaign. You alone see Jihad as the single greatest threat to the West. You alone realize its grave danger to our shared civilization.

In crepuscular moments, when you are blessed with increased discernment and the burdens of your civilization weigh upon your shoulders, remember that your first King, King David, faced a minimum of three civil wars during his first year alone. You are not only the legatee of a great tradition, but the heir to an historical legacy of which you are its treasured custodian. When you go the United Nations you alone seem to know the malevolent threat that Iran poses to your unmatched civilization; you alone seem to discern the evil conspiracies between the political leaders of that country and Hamas.

You will prevail, Prime Minister, because I believe you have suffered enough on earth through tragic loss of family, and professional setbacks and hardships to convince your country that Israel is not any longer interested in land for peace. This move has not gained your country any international respect. Quite the opposite. It has diminished the stature of Israel by making her seem overly conciliatory before the ugly and despicable face of Jihadism. Israel, I know you realize, will not sell out her moral reputation by sharing any semblance of sovereignty via a suicidal two-state solution with terroristic thugs who have seduced much of the western nation-states into viewing them as helpless victims. Any reader of contemporary Israel knows that the average Arab fares better economically and existentially under Israeli governance than he or she does under the corrupt, useless and inept PA, and under the nihilistic cult-of-death regime that is Hamas. You will prevail because you are a great patriot. You are a loyal stalwart not just for the cause of a political Israel, but because you know that Jews were the creators of historical time, and the first nation to enter into the historical process. You sense the precarious delicacy of ensuring her survival against the Jihadists that are all around you—around all of us in the West.

You were given a mandate by the people, and by God Himself to raise your state up to a higher register of earthly evolution. The Jewish state is an international treasure trove because it is not just the repository of good, of human excellence and greatness as well as the benefactor of the first great moral system, but, also, the Jewish people are an aspirational people. The world is never complete for them. Sometimes God seems absent from the world as if he had even divorced it. But Jews take up the mantle of moral leadership. Knowing that God’s return is imminent, they become fiduciaries and trustees of the world at large. Rather than ask God to reveal Himself to them, they find God through reparative, restorative and emancipatory work on this beautiful earth. They prevail upon the world. Hence the Jewish people are a universal people. They are a posthuman people. By this I mean, they give us a model for what an evolved humanity could look like in a world that is seemingly devoted to shrinking our humanity and, therefore, the best within ourselves. Having discovered the first monotheistic religion and the sole God who commands the universe, Jews have placed the moral sensibilities of Western man on a linear trajectory and a teleological path that has lead him to discover the foundations of his moral nature. The teleological destiny for Jews was, among other things, the promise and deliverance of a nation. It was one that was destroyed and then re-founded on secular principles but undergirded by the prevailing doctrine of ethical Zionism, a philosophy that ensures that the Jewish people will always have a home of their own, and that they will never be displaced as an exalted civilization and relegated to despicable backyards and ghettos in anyone else’s homeland.

Your legacy has yet to be completed, Prime Minister. You are the custodian of an ethical and beleaguered state—the most beleaguered state on this earth. You hold the future of a greater Israel in your open palms that face heaven. You hold a magnificent beacon of light worthy of emulation.

Do not let your heroic fire go out. Do not let specimens of the lowest common denominator in your country appropriate the moral vocabulary of victimization and use it against you. Fight with intransigent pride for the moral dignity of your ethical state. Assert your convictions with implacable certainty, knowing that they are for the good of Israel and western civilization.

And, Prime Minister, know this: In the Name of the Best within You—Yours is the Glory!

ABOUT JASON D. HILL

 

Αφήστε μια απάντηση

Η ηλ. διεύθυνσή σας δεν δημοσιεύεται. Τα υποχρεωτικά πεδία σημειώνονται με *