The Palestinians, who often rush to express their views on various regional and international conflicts, have been careful not to take sides in the war between Russia and Ukraine. “Close ties with Russia stop Palestinians from taking sides in Ukraine war – analysis,” by Khaled Abu Toameh, Jerusalem Post, February 26, 2022:

The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in the Gaza Strip have long maintained good relations with Russia.

Ties between the Palestinians and Russia are of long standing. In 1957 the Soviets put terrific pressure on Israel to withdraw its forces from the Sinai. In 1967 the Soviets took the Arab side in the Six-Day-War, and promptly resupplied the depleted armories of both Egypt and Syria. I was in Russia during the Six-Day War, studying Russian, and I well remember the newspaper headlines: “We are with you, Arab brothers!” and “Arabs Heroically Defend Their Motherland,” which allowed one to conclude that the Israelis, against all odds, were on Arab soil, and had won.

That’s why they [the Palestinians] have neither come out against the Russian invasion of Ukraine nor expressed any opinion about the conflict, at least not by Saturday night….

A week into the war, and the Palestinians still haven’t criticized Russia for its invasion. And they won’t. How could Mahmoud Abbas, who studied in the Soviet Union for years, and wrote his Holocaust- minimizing (“only 800,000 Jews, at most, were killed”) thesis at Patrice Lumumba University — The Other Side: the Secret Relationship Between Nazism and Zionism — ever turn his back on Russia, where he first learned how to promote antisemitic lies that have stood him in good stead ever since? And why should the Palestinians care if Vladimir Putin, a dictator very much to their liking, tries to reconstitute what he can of the former Soviet Union?

Russia for decades supplied money and weapons not just to such Arab enemies of Israel as Egypt and Syria, but also backed Arafat’s PLO. And after the Arab defeat in the Six-Day War, when it became clear that the Arabs should pivot to a diplomatic campaign against the Jewish state, the KGB helped create the campaign to convince the world that Israel had “stolen land belonging to the ‘Palestinian people’,” a newly-invented demonym concocted in Moscow, designed to change the perception of the Arab gang-up on Israel as, instead, a war between “two peoples,” the Jews and the Palestinians, who should split “Palestine” by having the Jewish state squeezed back within the 1949 armistice lines, with a nine-mile wide waist from Qalqilya to the sea.

Given this history of Russian financial, military, diplomatic, and “moral” support for the Palestinian Arabs, and Mahmoud Abbas’ personal ties to Russia, it would have been impossible to break with Moscow.

Over the past few weeks, a growing number of officials in Ramallah have expressed disappointment with the failure of the US administration to fulfill its promises to the Palestinians, including the reopening of the US consulate in Jerusalem and exerting pressure on Israel to halt settlement construction in the West Bank.

The PA leadership criticizes Biden for not fulfilling his promise to re-open the “consulate to the Palestinians” in Jerusalem. Abbas and Co. are apparently unaware that the Bidenites have now realized that there is something called the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations that requires any consulate that is to be opened or reopened to first receive the express consent of the country where the consulate is to be located. Bennett and Lapid have made clear that they will never give such consent to a consulate in Jerusalem. The Biden Administration’s hands are tied.

There is another matter, too, that may lead the Bidenites to change their current policy toward the Palestinians. The Biden adminitratioin has restored hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to the PA. In so doing, they have violated the Taylor Force Act, that prohibits giving aid to the PA as long as it keeps in place its “Pay-For-Slay” program, by which it provides generous monthly payments to imprisoned terrorists or to the families of terrorists killed while carrying out their attacks. The Bidenites claim that the money they are giving is allowed under an exception in the Taylor Force Act for “humanitarian aid.” But there is no such exception. Congress ought to call out the Administration on this, so as to force an end to the aid to the PA that violates both the letter and the spirit of Taylor Force. Then it will be clear to the PA that no matter how capitulationist the Bidenites may be – see their hair-raising concessions made to Iran at Vienna – they still must respect American laws and international treaties to which the U.S. is a party.

Obviously, Abbas has no intention of taking a stance towards the Russia-Ukraine war for fear that such a move would strain the PA’s relations with Moscow and sabotage his efforts to convince Putin to play a significant role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Abbas does not realize it, but there is no chance that Russia will continue to be accepted, after its invasion of Ukraine, as a member of the Quartet. The other members of the group – the U.N., the E.U., and the United States — now regard Russia as a pariah. And as long as Russian troops occupy the Ukraine, which could be for a very long time, not only will Russia not be welcome to continue as part of the Quartet, but given the diplomatic mess he has created for himself if he continues to keep an army of occupation in Ukraine, it’s unlikely Putin will want to take on the thankless and distracting task of trying, as a member of the Quartet, to fashion a permanent peace between Israel and the Palestinians. The only way such a permanent peace can be established is not through treaties but through deterrence, which requires Israel’s military to be overwhelmingly more powerful — and to be readily perceived as such — than its enemies, including Hamas, Hezbollah, PIJ, the PFLP, the Houthis in Yemen and, of course, Iran. Treaties will not keep the peace. Any treaty Muslims sign with non-Muslims may be violated by the Muslim side, emulating the behavior of Muhammad in 628 A.D. It was in that year that Muhammad, the Perfect Man (al-insan al-kamil) and Model of Conduct (uswa hasana) made an agreement with the Meccans that was to last for ten years. But after 18 months, sensing that his side had grown sufficiently strong, Muhammad broke the treaty and attacked the Meccans. That remains the model for Muslim treaty-making today.

Putin will either be kicked out, or voluntarily bow out, of the Quartet.

On the first day of the war, PLO Executive Committee member Hussein al-Sheikh announced that he had a phone call with Russian Deputy of Foreign Affairs Minister Mikhail Bogdanov. At first glance, it appeared as if the senior Palestinian official – a possible successor to Abbas – discussed with the Kremlin’s top diplomat the crisis in Ukraine.

But Sheikh said in his statement that he discussed with Bogdanov the decisions of the Palestinian Central Council (PCC), which met in Ramallah earlier this month.…

On the first day of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Abbas’ likely successor, Hussein al-Sheikh, talked by phone with the Russian Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov. But not a word was said, apparently, about the most significant military operation in Europe since World War II. Instead, the conversation was all about the decisions of the Palestinian Central Council – to which no one but the Palestinians pay the slightest attention – to suspend its recognition of Israel and to end security cooperation with the Jewish state. Foreign Minister Bogdanov expressed his country’s “support for peace in accordance with the resolutions of international legitimacy and justice,” which is code for all those U.N. Resolutions denouncing Israel. This Kremlin claim to support “international legitimacy and justice” is hard to swallow on the same day that 190,000 heavily armed Russian troops began their invasion of Ukraine.

The timing of the phone call may seem bizarre but it was clearly intended to send a message to the Russians that the PA does not want the Ukraine crisis to affect its relations with Putin….

Of course not. Why should a little thing like invading Ukraine get in the way of Palestinian-Russian relations? The Palestinians only wish they had 190,000 men under arms and Russian weapons, so that they too could emulate Putin by crushing underfoot the Jewish state.

Like the PA, the Hamas leadership is also keen on preserving its good relations with Moscow, especially in light of the group’s increasing isolation in the international arena.…

Hamas has been having a rough time of It lately. More countries have ceased to distinguish between the “political” and the “military” wings of Hamas, designating both as indissoluble parts of one terrorist whole, and outlawing the group. The heaviest blow was delivered by the British government, which in late 2021 outlawed all of Hamas, and made support of the group a crime. No wonder Hamas wants to keep the support of Russia.

That’s why Hamas was quick on Saturday to deny a statement attributed to Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal. According to the statement, Mashaal reportedly said that Putin “must halt his invasion of Ukraine and the killing of civilians.”

Concerned that the alleged statement would alienate Putin, the Hamas leadership denied the “fabricated” remarks attributed to Mashaal. “Mashaal did not make any statement to any media outlet regarding the Ukrainian crisis,” said a Hamas spokesperson.

Hamas mustn’t make Putin mad. So it had to deny that Mashaal had ever said such a thing. And if he did deplore the killing of civilians, should we not remind him that his very own Hamas lobbed 4,000 rockets at Israeli civilians back in May, and has made Jewish civilians its main target ever since the terror group came into being in 1987?

The only Hamas official to comment on the Russia-Ukraine crisis was Abu Marzouk, who wrote on Twitter that the lesson of the war was that the era of America’s status as unipolar superpower has ended.

But America lost its “status as a unipolar superpower” not because it must share that status with Russia, a country that has a minuscule economy, with a GDP of $1.4 trillion, as compared with the U.S.’s GDP of $21 trillion, but because it must share it with China. Russia has a population of 145 million, compared to 332 million people in the U.S. and 1.4 billion in China.

The US, the Hamas official argued, “was unable to take the decision of war in the face of Russia.”

The US got off to a slow start in helping Ukraine resist Russian aggression, but it has now found its footing, and is certainly not cowed by Putin. It has delivered close to $1 billion in weaponry, via Poland, to the Ukrainians, and has also helped persuade 27 European nations to supply more than $1 billion in weapons and other assistance. In addition, the U.S. has imposed the farthest-ranging financial sanctions ever imposed anywhere, on Russia. Surely all that amounts to taking “the decision of war in the face of Russia.”

If Russia takes weeks to subdue Ukraine, rather than the days that analysts had earlier predicted, and If it loses thousands of troops, as well as significant numbers of planes and tanks, Putin may not be able to survive politically. He appears all-powerful now, but if Ukraine turns into a morass, if a huge occupation army is required to keep a nation of 45 million subjugated, and if he cannot find a way to become unstuck from what will have become Tarbaby Ukraine, he will be in great trouble at home. Already, in the third day of fighting, some in his circle of billionaires – Fridman, Deripaska, Abramovich — called for an end to hostilities, which means the Russians should halt their invasion. What will he do if his loyalists desert him?

Any successor will be an anti-Putin, ready to pull out of Ukraine, and likely to look with disfavor on those who supported Putin’s Ukraine aggression, like Hamas and the Palestinian Authority. They’ve hitched their wagon to what I suspect will be a falling star.

13. ΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΑΤΕ ΤΩΡΑ, ΓΙΑΤΙ ΤΟ Α/”ΒΑΘΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ” ΔΕΝ ΑΦΗΣΕ ΤΟΝ ΤΡΑΜΠ, ΠΑΡ’ ΟΤΙ ΑΥΤΟΣ ΕΚΑΝΕ ΚΑΠΟΙΕΣ, “ΕΞ ΑΠΑΛΩΝ ΟΝΥΧΩΝ”, ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΕΙΕΣ, ΝΑ ΑΝΑΤΡΕΨΕΙ ΤΟΝ ΦΙΛΟ ΤΟΥ ΡΤΕ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥ… “ΣΟΡΟΣ-ΤΣΙΠΡΑ”, ΒΕΝΕΖΟΥΕΛΑΝΟ ΔΙΚΤΑΤΟΡΑ ΜΑΔΟΥΡΟ; 

Biden’s Handlers Find Another Authoritarian State to Buy Oil From

Closing the Keystone Pipeline and courting authoritarian regimes.

Wed Mar 9, 2022 

This isn’t rocket science: gas prices are hitting astronomical new heights every day because Old Joe Biden closed the Keystone Pipeline, ended our energy independence, and forced us to rely on supplies of Russian oil that have become problematic in all kinds of ways with the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Yet even as the crisis intensifies, Biden’s handlers refuse to reverse course and restore America’s own oil supplies; instead, it is courting authoritarian regimes, as if paying Russia for oil wasn’t enough financing of tyranny already. Next in line: Venezuela.

First came the Islamic Republic of Iran. On Wednesday, MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle asked Transportation Secretary Pete “Mr. Mom” Buttigieg if Biden would consider “working something out with Iran” for oil. Buttigieg wouldn’t rule out that possibility: “Look, the president has said that all options are on the table. But we also need to make sure we’re not galloping after permanent solutions to immediate short term problems where more strategic and tactical actions in the short term could make a difference.”

But the “Death to America”-chanting mullahs aren’t enough. Fox News reported Sunday that “several senior Biden administration officials from the White House and State Department traveled to Venezuela on Saturday to meet with the Russian ally as Moscow’s economy begins to crater under the weight of sanctions, according to a report.” The idea is to entice the brutal hard-Left regime of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro away from Moscow’s embrace. The U.S. used to be Venezuela’s biggest customer for its oil exports, but the Trump administration put sanctions on those exports in view of the Venezuelan regime’s tyrannical behavior and election fraud.

But for Biden’s handlers, that sort of thing is no problem, as is clear from the fact that the administration’s trip to Venezuela was “the highest-profile one to Venezuela from American officials in years.” The agenda is obvious: “Some in the U.S. are considering Venezuelan oil as a possible substitute to Russian imports, as more American politicians say the U.S. needs to end its reliance on Russian oil, which could help finance Putin’s war.” Maduro opened the door to this himself on Thursday, saying: “Here lies the oil of Venezuela, which is available for whomever wants to produce and buy it, be it an investor from Asia, Europe or the United States.”

It’s astonishing that we have an administration that would rather buy oil from two regimes that terrorize their own people than take the steps that would restore the energy independence the United States enjoyed under the Trump administration. This is partly because the “adults” who are back in charge now are so spiteful, hateful, and immature that they must do the opposite of whatever Trump did, no matter how well it worked and how ill-advised the alternative. Biden’s handlers also have to please the green energy advocates who form such an important part of their base and who apparently don’t mind the environmental damage that results from the production of oil if it takes place in far-off countries and isn’t on CNN.

Imagine if Biden’s handlers reversed course, reopened the Keystone Pipeline, and worked to restore America’s energy independence. The economy would improve, gas prices would go down, and we would be free of potentially dangerous entanglements with the likes of Russia, Iran, and Venezuela.

What’s the downside, apart from a few angry green energy advocates? It’s tempting to think that Biden’s handlers are behaving in a stupid and short-sighted way in all this, but they’re actually anything but stupid, and that leaves only one alternative: their America-Last priorities are on full display here. Biden’s handlers appear to be so committed to socialist internationalism that they would rather see corrupt, authoritarian regimes in other countries benefit than see the American people relieved from their increasingly severe economic plight.

If we shift from Russian oil to Iranian and Venezuelan oil, we will no longer be financing the invasion of Ukraine, which would be a fine thing, but it is unlikely that these two inveterately hostile regimes will give us a deal that would lead to a drop in fuel prices. Why should they? When the mullahs chant “Death to America,” they’re not just mouthing empty words; if Biden’s handlers hand them a sword, they will happily plunge it into our vitals. Venezuela is unlikely to be more friendly. Once again, 2022 and 2024 can’t come fast enough.

14. ΖΕΛΕΝΣΚΥ: Το “ΠΑΠΕΤ” ΤΟΥ ΣΟΡΟΣ! ΔΙΑΒΑΣΤΕ:

Why Does Zelensky Admire Justin Trudeau?

Are we allowed to explore the question?

Tue Mar 8, 2022 

Christine Douglass-Williams

It’s a particularly cringe-worthy statement:

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has stated that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was one of the reasons he got into politics.

Both leaders are members of the World Economic Forum (WEF).

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is, of course, fully worthy of unequivocal international condemnation. At the same time, it is may be unwise for us to blind ourselves to Ukraine’s dubious activities and alliances.

Some background:

The WEF is famous for unveiling the ‘Great Reset,’ an anti-Democracy plot where global leaders would set in motion a radical plan to transform the world economy into a socialist, big government model and implement a massive Green New Deal.  Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum Klaus Schwab, has praised Canada’s Prime Minister Trudeau as a model leader of WEF philosophies.

Written in a Financial Post article recently….

“ The WEF infiltration of Ottawa has never been a secret, nor has Butts’ involvement. But it is far from being common knowledge among voters that the ideological model behind the Liberal policy machine, the steering mechanism that guides decisions and policies, is subversive and authoritarian. It also covers a massive policy territory, from climate to COVID-19.”

A National Post article last year declared that Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland’s “side gig with the WEF” was “endangering Canadian democracy”; while Rebel Media Founder Ezra Levant Tweeted out Freeland’s scary plan to make her ‘emergency powers’ permanent, following the crackdown on the Truck Freedom Convoy supporters.

It won’t be any time soon that Trudeau’s crushing of Patriot dissent in Canada is forgotten via the abuse of Canada’s Emergency Measures Act over the Freedom Convoy. His actions prompted Victor Davis Hanson to say that Trudeau and his Liberals were “creating a ‘Tiananmen square’ scene.” Trudeau also ignored a real terrorist attack that virtually went unnoticed during his unforgivable authoritarian overreach

But then out of the blue, the day before Russia invaded the Ukraine, Trudeau suddenly ended his ‘emergency’ measures and “ordered Canadian banks to unfreeze the bank accounts of people who participated in or donated to the Freedom Convoy.”

Justin Trudeau’s name now conjures up an image of unfriendliness to democratic freedoms and values. He earned justified, widespread criticisms—domestically and internationally— for his handling of Canada’s Freedom Convoy.

Disappointing information has now arisen that shows Justin Trudeau—a man who admires China’s “basic dictatorship” and proved it—has a strong admirer after all: Ukraine leader Golodymyr Zelensky.

Many don’t know that Zelensky is also a member of the World Economic Forum.

Zalensky Tweeted out: “@JustinTrudeau was one of those leaders who inspired me to join politics.”

@JustinTrudeau was one of those leaders who inspired me to join politics. pic.twitter.com/DZYwLDgvkv

— Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) July 2, 2019

Again: the Russian invasion of Ukraine is worthy of full condemnation. But it would not be constructive for us to ignore asking questions, like: why does Zelensky admire a man like Justin Trudeau? And what might Zelensky’s agendas be in connection to his membership in the World Economic Forum and beyond?

Another consideration to ponder: George Soros was named by the Ukrainian newspaper Vesti as the second most influential person in Ukraine, after Zelensky. The 2014 Maidan Square “revolution” in Ukraine, which toppled the elected government of Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych, was supported by Soros, with his characteristic opportunism in mind. He wrote in his blog:

In order for Ukrainians to realize that future, the spirit of the Maidan must be preserved. They will need international support… And my foundation is working with experts in Ukraine to create a strategy for keeping the spirit of the Maidan alive.

Soros’ remarkable influence in Ukraine’s economic and political life spans over two decades and “maintains a unique position of power through the Open Society Foundation and the dozens of other organizations he funds in the country;” a country that voted against a UN resolution condemning the glorification of Nazism in 2016.

Popular broadcaster Michael Savage went so far as to condemn Zelensky as a “puppet of George Soros.” Savage may have gone too far, but his brow-raising remark should at least be enough to prompt a few questions — questions that should accompany the ones about Zelensky’s open admiration for Justin Trudeau.

15.

Is Europe Recovering Its Nerve?

Will the current resurrection of common sense and moral vigor last?

Wed Mar 9, 2022 

Bruce Thornton

Bruce Thornton is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

After the West finally toughened up economic sanctions against Russia and started providing Ukraine with weapons and other materiel, much commentary has appeared celebrating Europe’s awakening from its decades of myopic foreign policy idealism. Typical was columnist Michael Barone, who announced “a vast and historic transformation in Europe . . . that will continue reverberating, no matter what happens in Ukraine.”

But judging from past history, these moments of renewed vigor are unlikely to produce the deeper structural reforms needed to meet future challenges, especially from China and Iran.

There’s no question that EU nations have taken steps no one would have expected. Most noteworthy, Germany, which has long institutionalized pacifism and zero-carbon energy goals as expressions of national identity, is providing weapons to Ukraine, pledging to keep closed the Nord Stream 2 pipeline from Russia, and postpone the decommissioning of its remaining nuclear power plants. It also promises to raise its military spending by 100 billion Euros, with 78% of Germans approving the move.

According to German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, “February 24 marks a turning point in the history of our continent.” The EU and NATO, as optimists claim, are now restoring national defense and military preparedness to its rightful place in their spending, rather than relying on U.S. taxpayers to subsidize their security.

However, we’ve lived through such confident predictions before. After 9/11, the proliferation of flags on houses, the numbers of people joining the military, the return of open displays of patriotism and affection for our country, and the swift punishment of the Taliban for enabling the 9/11 attacks all suggested “this changes everything,” as many said. The vacation from history during the Nineties was over, and the U.S. was back, confident in the righteousness of its power and the goodness of its political order.

It didn’t take long for all that to change. The 2003 war in Iraq was waged during the presidential primary season, and the conflicts over the intelligence justifying it became politicized. Howard Dean’s insurgent primary campaign, and its antiwar demagoguery, caught fire and concentrated the minds of the establishment candidates. Senators John Kerry, John Edward, and Hillary Clinton––all of whom had voted for the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq based on the same intelligence used by the Bush administration––turned against the war. Fabulist Michael Moore’s duplicitous documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 became an in-kind contribution to the Democrat Party. Antiwar activists were “back in Saigon,” and the media filled with “Bush lied, millions died” and “no blood for oil” jingles and warnings about “escalation,” “quagmires,” “torture,” and “unjust war.”

For our adversaries, the return of American self-loathing, failure of nerve, and sacrifice of the nation’s security and interests to political expediency reassured them that the American “mincing Leviathan,” as Dennis Miller put it, that they knew and loved was back. The flags disappeared, and the country elected the vacuous “lightworker” Barack Obama, who instituted a foreign policy of retreat and “leading from behind,” and warned us against celebrating “American exceptionalism” as a uniquely defining feature, since “Brits believe in British exceptionalism, and the Greeks in Greek exceptionalism,” as Obama lectured in 2009.

That repudiation of “this changes everything” should make us skeptical of claims like Chancellor Schroder’s “turning point in history.” For one thing, there is less to the recent “tough sanctions” than meets the eye. The exclusion of Russian banks, for example, from the SWIFT system for managing global finance affects only seven banks, and leaves out Russia’s oil and gas sales. Much of the rest comprises promises for the future that are hostage to future governments and voters.

The most serious reservation regards the continuation of Western, especially European, dependence on Russian oil and gas. As even Aristophanes’ Lysistrata knew in his famous comedy, war depends on money, which is why the women barricade the treasury on the Acropolis. Right now the U.S. and Europe are paying Putin $1 billion a day for gas and oil, but sanctions on energy production and transactions––36% of Russia’s national revenue––are off the table, since the economic damage to the West would be too great. And given oil prices at $110 a barrel, average gas prices in the U.S. approaching $5 a gallon, and rates of inflation the highest in 40 years, the costs to politicians facing elections are too big to risk.

From a broader perspective, the most important reason for tempering our enthusiasm about “turning points” is the persistence of dysfunctional ideals that have contributed to the current crisis. These include the fantasies of a “new world order” in which increasing prosperity and the spread of liberal democracy will replace force with “diplomatic engagement.” This dubious idea has made appeasement of aggressors easier, for it gives Western leaders and diplomats a means for masking the lack of necessary action with endless talk at “summits” good only for photo-ops and braggadocios rhetoric. Given that the action needed to check an aggressor costs lives, money, and possibly a political career, diplomatic theater is the go-to response.

The current crisis is a good illustration of this dynamic. As the Wall Street Journal writes, Putin has long declared his malign intensions: “As far back as 2007, in a speech at the Munich Security Conference, Mr. Putin excoriated the European security order and teed up NATO enlargement as a ‘serious provocation’ that would justify a serious Russian response. His tone was fierce. In 2008 he reportedly told then-President George W. Bush he didn’t consider Ukraine a real country.”

That same year Putin snatched part of Georgia, and faced only ineffective economic sanctions. In 2014, no doubt he was emboldened by Obama’s global apology tour, preference for “leading from behind,” and anxious solicitation of a “reset” with Russia along with a promise of “flexibility” after the election. So no surprise that Putin acted on what he had publicly announced six years earlier about Ukraine not being a “real county,” and annexed Crimea and Ukraine’s Donbas region. Again, no response apart from diplomatic scolding and ineffective sanctions.

More troublesome, even as we are trying to confront a brutal aggressor in Ukraine, our diplomats in Vienna are partnering with Russia to restore the feckless Iran nuclear deal with a genocidal regime that, like Putin, has made clear its traditional jihadist aims of establishing Islam’s sharia hegemony over the whole world. Such is the incoherence of our decrepit foreign policy orthodoxy.

As a result of that stale paradigm, we are now faced with the biggest armed conflict in Europe since 1945, one that no Western leader is going to mobilize his military, or even shut down Russia’s oil and gas revenue, to end. The institutional structures, foreign policy shibboleths, and political calculations that have put us between a geopolitical rock and a hard place have not changed. This means sooner or later, Barone’s “transformation” will stop “reverberating.”

The second deep-seated bad idea that has made this crisis so difficult is the war on carbon that the West has been waging for decades, and that has given Putin such powerful leverage. Europe may keep some nuclear power plants and build some LNG terminals, but the underlying rationale for this obsession with “green” and “renewable” energy is not going to be abandoned. “Climate change,” which is more correctly known as Anthropogenic Catastrophic Global Warming (ACGW), is too embedded in the cultures of the West despite its dubious science and reliance on hinky computer models. There is too much money to be made from “green” subsidies and research grants.

But there’s something more than just lucre. In a secular age of declining traditional faiths, political religions fill the void. ACGW embodies old nature-love myths and anxieties about modernity and technology, yet wraps itself in the quantitative data and polysyllabic jargon of science, the better to exploit our cognitive elite’s fetish for “following the science.” The “climate change” gospel, then, serves our innate need for a master narrative about good and evil, redemption, and the superiority of our virtue.

The cost of this cult has been high. Pursuing the green-energy chimera has endangered the West’s access to the cheap energy that has powered the phenomenal growth in wealth across the globe. And it has empowered Russia and China, who have no intention of following the West over the green cliff. Hence the most stark repudiation of the “net-zero carbon” delusion: even if the West creates a carbon-free world, temperatures will not decline. But our civilization will, while emission-spewing China replaces the West as the global hegemon.

For a true “turning point” to happen, it will take more than a pipeline here or nuclear power-plant there. The whole cult of ACGW that permeates our culture, schools, entertainment, and corporations will have to discredited, while our own oil and gas resources are aggressively developed, just as Donald Trump did during his term, leaving the U.S. the world’s top producer and exporter of oil products and natural gas.

Finally, all the countries of the West need to increase their defense spending, and NATO in particular. The ignored 2% of GDP standard is shamefully low for rich countries like France and especially Germany. And our current 3.2% of GDP in military spending is woefully inadequate given how far we’ve slipped behind China. If we are as serious about protecting the sanctity of national borders and the “rules-based international order” as our rhetoric suggests, we have to accept that at some point we’ll have to use force to back up our principles, which requires spending a lot more money than we do now.

If history is a guide, the current recovery of common sense and moral vigor will fade once the crisis abates. All Russia and China have to do is wait.

16. KAI TO EΡΩΤΗΜΑ ΠΑΡΑΜΕΝΕΙ ΑΝΑΠΑΝΤΗΤΟ!

“ΓΙΑΤΙ ΚΑΘΕ ΦΟΡΑ ΠΟΥ ΕΧΟΥΜΕ ΤΟΥΣ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΚΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΚΟΜΜΑ ΤΟΥΣ, (ΤΟ ΚΟΜΜΑ ΤΟΥ ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΥ), ΣΤΗΝ Κ-Β ΤΩΝ Η.Π.Α., ΕΧΟΥΜΕ ΚΑΙ ΠΟΛΕΜΟΥΣ ΣΤΟΝ ΠΛΑΝΗΤΗ, ΠΙΣΩ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΠΟΙΟΥΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΥΤΟΙ“; 

17. Ο ΕΛΛΗΝΑΣ Π-Θ ΜΕΤΑΒΑΙΝΕΙ ΣΤΟ… “ΦΑΝΑΡΙ”, ΛΕΓΕ ΜΕ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑ, ΑΜΕΣΩΣ ΜΕΤΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΕΠΙΣΚΕΨΗ ΣΤΗΝ ΓΕΙΤΟΝΑ ΧΩΡΑ ΤΗΣ Α/ΥΦΕΞ (ΜΙΑ ΕΞ ΑΥΤΩΝ), ΚΑΣ ΣΕΡΜΑΝ!.. ΣΚΕΦΤΕΙΤΕ ΤΩΡΑ!..

ΣΕ ΚΑΘΕ ΠΕΡΙΠΤΩΣΗ, Ο,ΤΙ ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΚΑΝΕΙ Ο ΡΤΕ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΦΕΡΕΙ “ΚΟΝΤΑ” ΤΟΥΣ ΠΟΥΤΙΝ – “Ζ”, ΟΣΟ ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΣΥΝΑΝΤΗΘΟΥΝΕ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΤΑ ΒΡΟΥΝΕ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑ, ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΣΥΜΜΑΧΙΚΟ ΟΦΕΛΟΣ, ΕΜΠΡΟΣ ΣΤΟΝ ΤΡΟΜΟ ΤΗΣ Ρ/”ΑΡΚΟΥΔΑΣ”, ΘΥΜΗΘΕΙΤΕ ΜΑΣ! ΟΙ ΡΩΣΟΙ, ΠΟΛΥ ΣΥΝΤΟΜΑ ΧΡΟΝΙΚΑ, (ΣΥΝΤΟΜΑ ΣΤΟΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟ-ΣΤΡΑΤΙΩΤΙΚΟ  ΒΕΒΑΙΩΣ ΧΡΟΝΟ) ΘΑ “ΒΓΟΥΝ” ΣΤΡΑΤΙΩΤΙΚΑ ΣΤΗΝ Β. ΚΑΙ Α. ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑ, ΟΣΟ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑ, ΤΗΝ ΟΠΟΙΑ ΥΠΕΜΝΗΣΕ ΣΧΕΔΟΝ ΠΡΟΣΦΑΤΩΣ Ο ΡΤΕ, ΜΕ ΣΤΟΧΟ ΤΗΝ ΚΩΝ-ΠΟΛΗ ΚΑΙ ΤΑ ΣΤΕΝΑ!..

18. ΜΕΧΡΙ ΚΑΙ(!) ΤΟ ΚΑΛΟΚΑΙΡΙ ΤΟΥ 2022 ΘΑ ΕΧΟΥΜΕ ΚΑΙ ΘΑ ΑΚΟΥΜΕ… ΟΥΚΡΑΝΙΑ, ΚΛΠ! ΜΕΤΑ ΑΠΟ ΜΙΑ ΠΡΟΣΚΑΙΡΗ ΠΑΥΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΟΠΟΙΩΝ ΔΡΑΣΕΩΝ, ΓΙΑ ΞΕΚΟΥΡΑΣΗ ΚΑΙ… ΑΝΑΣΕΣ, ΟΙ ΡΩΣΟΙ, ΟΠΩΣ ΑΠΟ ΠΕΡΥΣΙ ΓΡΑΦΑΜΕ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΙΚΑ, ΑΛΛΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΠΟΡΑΔΙΚΩΣ ΠΑΛΑΙΟΤΕΡΑ, ΘΑ ΚΑΝΟΥΝ ΤΟ ΑΝΑΦΕΡΟΜΕΝΟ ΝΕΟ ΑΛΜΑ ΤΟΥΣ, ΑΥΤΟ ΤΗΣ ΠΑΡ. 17! ΕΥΤΥΧΩΣ ΠΟΥ “ΒΓΗΚΕ” Ο Α/”CIA” ΚΑΙ ΔΗΛΩΣΕ ΠΩΣ “Ο ΠΟΥΤΙΝ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΡΕΛΟΣ”, ΜΠΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΕΤΣΙ, ΑΝΤΙΛΗΦΘΟΥΝ, ΤΟΥΛΑΧΙΣΤΟΝ, ΚΑΠΟΙΟΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΔΥΣΗ ΟΤΙ, “ΔΕΝ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΠΟΤΕ ΝΑ ΜΕΙΩΝΕΙΣ ΤΟΝ ΑΝΤΙΠΑΛΟ ΣΟΥ, ΑΝ ΦΙΛΟΔΟΞΕΙΣ ΝΑ ΤΟΝ ΚΕΡΔΙΣΕΙΣ”!..

19. www.debka.com

Herzog’s Turkey visit marks first high-level event since 2008

Mar 9, 2022

President Isaac Herzog awaits a full-honors greeting on Wednesday when he lands in Ankara for talks with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan after 14 years of acrimonious relations. Erdogan will also host the president and Michal Herzog at a state dinner. The visit was Israel’s first cautious response to Erdogan’s intense efforts to bury the hatchet amid lingering distrust. Among the issues between the two countries was Ankara’s long years of support for the Palestinian extremist Hamas and hosting of organizers of terrorist attacks on the West Bank.

20.

Israel jets shot down 2 Iranian drones heading for Gaza and West Bank

 Mar 7, 2022 

The IDF disclosed on Monday that in the past year, two Iranian drones were intercepted and shot down by IAF F-35 jets far from Israeli skies in an apparent attempt to develop a weapons-smuggling route to the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. The operation took place in coordination with neighboring countries. The UAVs were detected and tracked throughout their flight by ground control units.  A year ago, Iran unsuccessfully launched two UAV’s towards Israel. Iran has since developed new drones able to carry large loads of weapons and explosives with a range of 3,000km and able to fly as low as 200-400m above the ground to evade detection.

21.

MİT tırlarının durdurulması davasında yeni gelişme!

Adana ve Hatay’da MİT’e ait tırların FETÖ mensuplarınca durdurulmasına ilişkin ana davadan dosyası ayrılan 7 sanığın Yargıtayda yargılandığı davada karar açıklandı. 3 sanığa 15 yıl 10’ar ay hapis cezası verildi, 4 sanık beraat etti.

 

 09.03.2022

İlk derece mahkemesi sıfatıyla Yargıtay 3. Ceza Dairesinde görülen duruşmada, bazı sanıklar ile avukatları hazır bulundu.

“Adana ve Hatay’da MİT‘e ait tırların durdurulmasına” ilişkin 54 sanığın yargılandığı ana davadan dosyaları ayrılan 7 sanığın yargılandığı davada, Mahkeme başkanlığını yapan Yargıtay 3. Ceza Dairesi Üyesi Ahmet Ömeroğlu, önceki duruşmaları kapalı görülen davanın karar aşamasına gelmesi nedeniyle kapalılık kararının kaldırıldığını bildirdi ve sanıklar hakkındaki hükmü açıkladı.

Buna göre, eski başçavuşlar Ömer Muharrem Güneş, Galip Arslan ve Adana İl Jandarma İstihbarat ve Asayiş Müdürlüğünde görevli eski astsubay Sezai Akyüz, “FETÖ üyeliği” suçundan 7 yıl 6’şar ay, “devletin güvenliğine ilişkin bilgileri temin etme” suçundan 3 yıl 4’er ay, “devletin güvenliğine ve siyasal yararlarına ilişkin bilgileri açıklama” suçundan ise 5’er yıl hapse mahkum edildi.

Daire, diğer sanıklar Hayati Özcan, Celalettin Bardakçı, Mesut Çelik ve İsmail Önder Ata’nın beraatine karar verdi.

MİT’E AİT TIRLARI DURDURMUŞLARDI 

Hatay’ın Kırıkhan ve Adana’nın Ceyhan ilçesinde Ocak 2014’te MİT’e ait araçların durdurularak, arama yapılması nedeniyle Adana Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı tarafından “Devletin güvenliği, iç veya dış siyasal yararları bakımından, niteliği itibarıyla gizli kalması gereken bilgileri, siyasal veya askeri casusluk maksadıyla temin etmek ve açıklamak” suçlarından yürütülen soruşturma kapsamında olaya karışan 54 kişi hakkında kamu davası açılmıştı.

Aralarında üst düzey bürokratların bulunması nedeniyle ilk derece mahkemesi sıfatıyla Yargıtayda görülen dava, Yargıtay 16. Ceza Dairesinde 28 Haziran 2019’da karara bağlanmıştı.

Daire, aralarında eski Adana Cumhuriyet Başsavcısı Süleyman Bağrıyanık ile eski Adana Jandarma Bölge Komutanı tuğgeneral Hamza Celepoğlu’nun da bulunduğu bazı sanıklara 22 yıl 6 aya kadar hapis cezası vermiş, sanıklardan bazılarının beraatlerine hükmetmiş, 7 sanık hakkındaki kamu davasını ise ayırmıştı.

22.

Anında sildiler: NATO’nun Ukrayna paylaşımda Nazi sembolü

09.03.2022

1 / 10

Rusya’nın Ukrayna’ya başlattığı işgal girişimi 14. gününe girdi.

2 / 10

Rus ordusunun ilerleyişi, sivillerin tahliyesi sebebiyle hız kesmiş durumda. Ukrayna ordusu da şehir savaşlarına hazırlanmaya devam ediyor.

3 / 10

Öte yandan iki ülke arasında müzakereler de sürüyor. Rus Bakan Lavrov, Ukraynalı mevkidaşı Kuleba ile yarın Antalya’da bir araya gelecek.

4 / 10

Dünyanın Rusya’ya yaptırımları da devam ediyor. İşgal başladığından bugüne kadar yaklaşık 4 bin yaptırım kararı alındı. Biden son olarak, Rus petrolünün ithalatınına yasak getirdi.

5 / 10

Tüm bu gelişmeler yaşanırken, NATO’nun resmi Twitter hesabından, 8 Mart Dünya Emekçi Kadınlar Günü’nü dair bir paylaşım yapıldı.

6 / 10

Ukraynalı kadın askerin de kullanıldığı mesajda, “Bütün kadınlar özgür ve eşit yaşamalı. Bu Kadınlar Günü’nde kalbimiz Ukraynalı kadınların yanında. Onların dayanıklılığı, direnci ve kuvveti, Ukrayna ulusunun ruhunu simgeliyor” ifadelerine yer verildi.

7 / 10 O “MAYΡΟΣ ΗΛΙΟΣ” ΤΩΝ ΝΑΖΙ, ΣΤΟ ΣΤΗΘΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΟΥΚΡΑΝΗΣ! (ΠΑΡΑΚΑΤΩ “ΦΩΤΟ”)!

“KARA GÜNEŞ” SEMBOLLÜ ASKERİ PAYLAŞTILAR

Ancak bu paylaşımda kadın askerin üzerinde bulunan sembol dikkat çekti.

8 / 10

NATO’nun paylaştığı kadının üzerinde Nazizm sembolü olan “Kara Güneş” yer alıyordu.

9 / 10

NATO, söz konusu durumun fark edilmesinden kısa bir süre sonra paylaşımı kaldırdı

10 / 10

KARA GÜNEŞ SEMBOLÜ NEDİR?

Kara Güneş (Schwarze Sonne) bir Nazi sembolü ve bir tür güneş çarkıdır. Neo-Naziler ve bazı okültist altkültürler tarafından, Satanizm gibi, Nazi Almanyası sonrası bağlamında kullanılmıştı.

 

Bakan Akar: Rus limanlarındaki gemiler Türkiye’ye gelecek

Milli Savunma Bakanı Hulusi Akar yaptığı son dakika açıklamasında; (Rus limanlarındaki gemiler) En kısa zamanda Türkiye’ye gelecek. En kısa zamanda olumlu gelişmeler bekliyoruz.

09.03.2022 

 

Milli Savunma Bakanı Hulusi Akar, “Rus limanlarında gemilerimiz var. Onların da bir an önce daha önce planlandığı gibi güvenli bir şekilde Türkiye’ye gönderilmesi. Önümüzdeki günlerde olumlu gelişmeler bekliyoruz” dedi.

ŞOYGU İLE GÖRÜŞME

Bakan Akar, TBMM’deki AK Parti Grup toplantısı öncesi gazetecilerin sorularını cevapladı. Akar, Rusya Savunma Bakanı Sergey Şoygu ile görüşmesine ilişkin, “Şoygu ile olumlu, yapıcı bir görüşme yaptık. Birinci konu ateşkesin bir an önce gerçekleştirilmesi ve ateşkesin gelmesi. Türkiye olarak iki uçağımız var. Aynı zamanda Rus limanlarında gemilerimiz var. Onların da bir an önce daha önce planlandığı gibi güvenli bir şekilde Türkiye’ye gönderilmesi. Önümüzdeki günlerde olumlu gelişmeler bekliyoruz” dedi.

Milli Savunma Bakanı Hulusi Akar

TÜRK GEMİLERİ

Deniz Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı gemilerinin bu gemilere refakat edip etmeyeceği sorusu üzerine Akar, “Ona gerek yok. Ticaret gemilerimizin gelmesi konusunda gerekli güvenliği Rusya tarafı sağlayacak. Uygun olan zamanda gelecek. Gıda gemileri dışında Türk bandralı gemilerimiz var” ifadelerini kullandı.

23.

Here’s Your Russian Collusion: Biden Working with Russia on New Iran Nuke Deal

Why exactly is Biden getting Russian help to appease Iran?

Mon Mar 7, 2022 

Robert Spencer

Just when you think the Biden administration couldn’t possibly get worse, it finds a way. Gabriel Noronha, a former State Department official, tweeted Wednesday that State, NSC, and European Union officials are warning that “what’s happening in Vienna,” where Biden’s handlers are negotiating a new nuclear deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran, “is a total disaster,” and that they’re hoping that “Congress will act to stop the capitulation.”

It’s about as likely that Congress will stop this, of course, as it is that Biden’s handlers will send Donald J. Trump himself to Vienna to handle the negotiations, but there are abundant signs that the new agreement will be far worse than the old one, and directly endanger America and its allies. For one thing, even amidst ever-rising tensions with Russia and punitive sanctions, the administration has turned over leadership of the negotiations to a Russian diplomat, Mikhail Ulyanov. Yes, that’s right: Putin’s man is going to get us a new deal with the mullahs.

The trouble is not coming just from the fact that we are trusting Russia to act in America’s best interests (although America’s best interests have never been a priority for Biden’s handlers, and there is really no reason to believe that they have ever been a priority in the Vienna negotiations). Noronha added: “Led by Rob Malley, the U.S. has promised to lift sanctions on some of the regime’s worst terrorists and torturers, leading officials in the regime’s WMD infrastructure, and is currently trying to lift sanctions on the IRGC itself.”

Robert Malley has won renown and disgust as a man who has never hesitated to kowtow to America’s enemies. Judicial Watch noted back in 2015 that “over the years he has published a number of newspaper opinion pieces urging the United States to reach out and negotiate with terrorist enemies like Hamas, Hezbollah and Muqtada al-Sadr.” Now the Iranian mullahs can be added to that list, but since they won’t sully themselves by dealing directly with the emissaries of the Great Satan, the Russians are helpfully playing intermediary.

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo noted the danger of all this absurdity in a tweet last Sunday: “President Biden — stop partnering with Russia to cut a deal with Iran. When China and Russia are on your side of the table negotiating ‘against’ Iran, you are putting America and Israel at risk.” A senior congressional official added on Monday: “It’s obvious that Russia should no longer serve as one of the key intermediaries brokering an Iran deal. We need to be isolating Russia not just economically, but also diplomatically. There is absolutely no chance that Russia has U.S. national security interests in mind when it comes to Iran’s nuclear program.”

Yeah. But Biden’s handlers show no sign of relenting on this. To all appearances, they’re rushing headlong in to a deal with Tehran that would, surprise of surprises, place Russia in a key role, as did the original Obama nuke deal. NBC News explained that “Under one draft interim agreement that sources said Russia presented to Iran, Tehran would be required to stop enriching uranium up to 60 percent purity and dispose of its current stockpile, possibly by exporting it to Russia, along with other restrictions. In exchange, the Iranian government would receive access to billions of dollars in oil revenues frozen in foreign bank accounts, including in South Korea, the sources said.”

So the Russians would get uranium at a time when Vladimir Putin has raised nuclear tensions to a level we have not seen since the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the Islamic Republic, whose leaders finance not just jihad terror groups, but also Leftist groups that work to destabilize Western societies would get billions. What could possibly go wrong?

Then there is the ongoing malevolence of the country that forces its people to chant “Death to America” in mosques every Friday. On Sept. 23, 2015, two months after the nuke deal was finalized, Khamenei published an article entitled “The Idols Will Be Shattered,” illustrated with a drawing of the Statue of Liberty shattered in pieces. In it, he declared, “The idol of the soul, the idol of pride, [and] the idol of sexual lust; the idol of tyranny and subservience; the idol of global tyranny [that is, the U.S.]; the idol of sloth and irresponsibility; and the other idols that shame the precious human soul—a plan that will spring forth from the depths of the heart will shatter them.”

That doesn’t exactly sound as if the JCPOA was a path to peaceful coexistence. And more recently, on Tuesday Khamenei blamed the “Mafia regime” in the United States for the conflict in Ukraine. So in Vienna, Biden’s handlers are now cooperating with a diplomat from one hostile power in order to appease another hostile power. Remember back when we had an administration that worked for Americans?

24. ME TO “OYKΡANIKO” ΕΧΟΥΜΕ ΚΑΙ ΠΑΛΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ, ΜΙΑ ΑΚΟΜΑ ΥΠΟΧΡΕΩΤΙΚΗ ΜΕΤΑΚΙΝΗΣΗ – ΕΠΙΣΤΡΟΦΗ ΕΒΡΑΙΩΝ ΣΤΟ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ, ΑΝ ΚΑΙ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΦΕΡΟΥΝ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΥΚΡΑΝΟΥΣ ΝΑ ΕΜΠΟΔΙΖΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΦΥΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΕΒΡΑΙΩΝ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΧΩΡΑ ΤΟΥΣ!

25. WE STILL LOVE YOU, MR PRESIDENT!

Netanyahu: ‘The Iranians are fighting like lions while Bennett, Lapid and Gantz surrender like rabbits’

March 8, 2022

Leader of the Opposition and head of the Likud party Benjamin Netanyahu, February 28, 2022. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Opposition leader and former pm Benjamin Netanyahu accuses the Israeli government of inaction regarding the Iranian nuclear deal.

By Yehuda Shlezinger, Israel Hayom via JNS.org

Opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday lambasted the government for its “silence” vis-à-vis the emerging nuclear deal with Iran, saying its actions were “endangering Israel’s future.”

Speaking during a Likud faction meeting, Netanyahu said that “the Bennett-Gantz-Lapid government shows only weakness, weakness and more weakness.”

“They have capitulated to the U.S. administration,” Netanyahu added, “agreeing to a policy of zero surprises—meaning that Israel will not act against the Iranian nuclear program without first coordinating it with the Americans, who will undoubtedly oppose such action and may even jeopardize things by leaking [the information].”

Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, Foreign Minister Yair Lapid and Defense Minister Benny Gantz “are doing nothing against the dangerous deal currently being formed in Vienna. This should be the government’s priority right now—vehemently opposing this dangerous deal,” he asserted.

“Russian envoy to the Vienna talks Mikhail Ulyanov said this week that ‘the Iranians got more than they asked for—they are fighting like lions over every word and every comma.’ And over here? No one is fighting. The Iranians are fighting like lions while Bennett, Lapid and Gantz are surrendering like rabbits,” Netanyahu continued.

Moreover, he said, Israel’s silence makes it harder for “our friends in the United States” to oppose the deal.

“If they don’t see or hear Israel oppose it, why should they? Why should they try to repeal it later on? It was our persistent objection that helped the U.S. exit the previous agreement. The government’s silence undermines the legitimization for any future Israeli action against Iran’s nuclear facilities,” he said.

Bennett, Lapid and Gantz should be focusing on Iran, not Ukraine, stressed Netanyahu, but are not doing so because “they are simply not ready to confront even our allies.”

26. Όταν οι Δυτικοί κατηγορούν τους Ρώσους σήμερα για “ΑΝΑΘΕΩΡΗΤΙΣΜΟ”, θυμίζουν την ελληνική παροιμία, “ΒΓΑΛ’ ΤΗΝ ΣΚΟΥΦΙΑ ΣΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΒΑΡΑ ΜΕ”!..

27. Προς την Κα Μπακογιάννη! Σας ακούσαμε στις 01-03-2022 στην TV και με σεβασμό, σας ρωτάμε ή σας παραθέτουμε τα παρακάτω:

• Ποιό ακριβώς είναι το αμυντικό δόγμα της ΕΕ, στο οποίο, ως τίτλο, αναφερθήκατε;
• Ακούγετε σαν ανέκδοτο να λέτε “Δημοκρατική Ουκρανία”!..
• Θέλετε να μας πείτε, πώς ακριβώς ορίζεται ο “ΑΝΑΘΕΩΡΗΤΙΣΜΟΣ” και ποιός ακριβώς είναι ο Ρωσικός, πώς εκδηλώνεται αυτός και αν υπήρχε ποτέ ή υπάρχει ακόμα σήμερα και αμερικανικός;
• Προτιμάτε τον Μπάϊντεν και τους “ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΚΟΥΣ”, με τους οποίους και πάλι(!), μετά από την διάλυση της Γ/Β, έχουμε πόλεμο στην Ευρώπη(!), από τους Ρεπουμπλικανούς  και πχ τον Κο Τραμπ, με τον οποίο είχαμε ησυχία, επί 4 χρόνια;
• Ποιές ακριβώς είναι σήμερα οι ελληνικές “Αρχές και Αξίες”, στις οποίες αναφερθήκατε; (Ελληνικές, όχι οι “fake” και συνεχώς αναμασούμενες των Δυτικών);
• Οι Ρώσοι έχουν μπει στην μισή Ουκρανία και δεν έχουν πετύχει;
• Για τον Κο Λαβρώφ έχετε θετική εικόνα, για τον λόγο ότι ως ΥΠΕΞ κάποτε που ήσασταν, εξυπηρετούσατε από κοινού τα τότε σχέδια της “Διεθνούς Εξουσίας”, σε μια εποχή (1η 10ετία του 21ου αι.), που η Ρωσία δεν είχε ακόμα λόγους να αντιδρά σ’ αυτά (“Αραβική Άνοιξη”, Σχέδιο “Μεγάλης Μέσης Ανατολής”, κλπ), αλλ’ αντιθέτως;
• Πότε είπε η Ρωσία ότι η “Λωζάνη” δεν ισχύει και πως θέλει να την αλλάξει; Η Ουκρανία ήταν μέρος κάπου της συνθήκης αυτής και μας διαφεύγει; Τέλος, η συνθήκη αυτή αλλάζει λέτε και χωρίς έναν νέο Π.Π.;
• Γιατί όσοι διαφωνούν μαζί σας ή τέλος πάντων με την πλειοψηφική… μάζα, είναι κατ’ ανάγκην “Ακροδεξιοί” και “Φασίστες”, Κα Μπακογιάννη; Μήπως δεν ανήκετε στην ΝΔ, αλλά στους πρακτόρικους αμερικανικούς (της “CIA” της αγαπημένης σας οικογένειας Κλίντον), “ΑΝΤΑΡ-CIA” και “ANTI-FA”;
• Γιατί είπατε πως είναι δύσκολο να βρει κανείς ποιός ξεκίνησε στον Ντονμπάς, όταν, τουλάχιστον εκεί, ΤΑ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΤΑ, ΑΠΟ ΤΟ 2014, ΕΩΣ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ, ΕΙΝΑΙ Α-ΔΙ-Α-ΜΦΙ-ΣΒΗ-ΤΗ-ΤΑ και συντριπτικά κατά των ΝΑΖΙ συνεργατών – σφαγέων της Κ-Β του Κιέβου; Δηλαδή έχουν ΣΕ ΟΛΑ ΔΙΚΙΟ ΟΙ ΟΥΚΡΑΝΟΙ, Κα Μπακογιάννη;
• Αφού ό,τι γίνεται τώρα στην Ουκρανία είναι το ίδιο με τα όσα έκαναν οι Τούρκοι στην Κύπρο, κλπ, ή πιθανώς να ξανακάνουν, κλπ, τότε γιατί οι Ευρωπαίοι, αλλά και οι Αγγλοσάξωνες, πχ δεν έβαλαν ποτέ ΚΥΡΩΣΕΙΣ στην Τουρκία, κυρώσεις με… νόημα, όπως αυτές που επέβαλαν στην Ρωσία;
• ΚΑΙ ΑΛΛΑ ΠΟΛΛΑ ΕΡΩΤΗΜΑΤΑ “ΓΕΝΝΙΟΝΤΑΝ” ΑΥΘΟΡΜΗΤΑ, ΟΤΑΝ ΜΙΛΟΥΣΑΤΕ, ΑΛΛΑ ΤΩΡΑ ΜΟΝΟΝ ΑΥΤΑ ΜΠΟΡΩ ΝΑ ΘΥΜΗΘΩ!..

28. Δηλαδή, Κε Π-Θγέ, οι Ρωσίδες μάνες που ο… τρελός Πούτιν, κλπ, κλπ, κλπ, τους πήρε τα παιδιά και τα έστειλε σ’ αυτόν τον… άδικο, κλπ, κλπ, κλπ πόλεμο, δεν είναι γυναίκες, ώστε να αναφερόσασταν και σ’ αυτές, κατά την “ΗΜΕΡΑ ΤΗΣ ΓΥΝΑΙΚΑΣ”; Αυτές δεν πονάνε; Αρκετές απ’ αυτές δεν θα πάρουν πίσω τα πτώματα των παιδιών τους ή και καθόλου; Με ποιό δικαίωμα διαχωρίζεται ακόμα και τον ανθρώπινο πόνο, δείχνοντας μια ανεκδιήγητη εμπάθεια, την οποίαν ΔΕΝ ΑΝΑΜΕΝΑΜΕ από εσάς; Η ανθρωπιά σας, έχει και αυτή χρώμα;

29. Ο Γερμανός Καγκελάριος Σολτζ είναι συγγενής του Αξκού των ΝΑΖΙ (“Waffen – SS”) Φριτς Φον Σολτζ, ο οποίος είχε βραβευτεί από τους Χιρτλερικούς με τον “Σιδηρού Σταυρό”; Μπορείτε να μας απαντήσετε, ρε Γερμαναράδες;

30. Με αφορμή, Κε Π-Θ γέ, την ειρωνική σας αποστροφή για τον Α. Γ. ΠΑΠΑΝΔΡΕΟΥ, στην πρόσφατη ομιλία σας στην Βουλή, για το “Ουκρανικό”, αναφερόμενος στο “Κίνημα των Αδεσμεύτων”, κλπ, θα Σας συμβούλευα να μάχεστε και να αγωνίζεστε με τους όποιους άλλους σημερινούς σας (“λίγους” πράγματι εμπρός σας, ως κύρος, κλπ) αντιπάλους, αφήνοντας “απ’ έξω” ανοίκια λεκτικά σχήματα, δήθεν ευφυολογήματα, για πολιτικούς με τους οποίους ΔΕΝ ΘΑ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΕΙ ΠΟΤΕ ΔΥΝΑΤΟΝ ΝΑ ΣΥΓΚΡΙΘΕΙΤΕ, ειδικά με τον Α.Γ.ΠΑΠΑΝΔΡΕΟΥ, εκτός Κε Π-Θ γέ, ΑΝ ΕΠΙ ΗΜΕΡΩΝ ΣΑΣ Η ΕΛΛΑΣ ΑΠΟΚΤΗΣΕΙ ΩΣ ΠΡΩΤΕΥΟΥΣΑ, ΤΗΝ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΤΗΣ ΚΩΝ-ΠΟΛΗ, ΕΠΙΣΤΡΕΨΕΙ ΣΕ ΜΙΑ ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΗ Μ. ΑΣΙΑ, ΚΛΠ!

Μην  σας παρασύρει η αγάπη σας για τον Πατέρα σας και η σχέση εκείνου με τον Ανδρέα Παπανδρέου! Αφήστε, εκτός από τους νεκρούς πλέον αυτούς πολιτικούς άνδρες στον Άδη, και την περίοδο εκείνη στο ιστορικό παρελθόν! Αν εσείς που είστε νουνεχής κάνετε κάτι τέτοιο, τότε η Πατρίδα θα κερδίσει ως προς την ΙΣΧΥ της, αφού θα έχει κερδίσει η ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΩΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΩΝ, ΤΟΣΟ ΕΠΙΤΑΚΤΙΚΗ ΚΑΙ ΑΝΑΓΚΑΙΑ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ, δεδομένου του ισχύοντος “ΕΝ ΤΗ ΕΝΩΣΕΙ Η ΙΣΧΥΣ”!.. 

31. Ποιός / ποιοί χρηματοδοτεί / – ούν την “Διεθνή Λεγεώνα”, η οποία σχηματίστηκε και μετέβη στην Ουκρανία να πολεμήσει τους Ρώσους;

-/-