ΕΝΗΜΕΡΩΣΗ Νο “2”.

1.

Biden Taps Globalist Blinken for Sec of State

And picks John Kerry to serve as special climate envoy.

 

Joe Biden has gone back to the well of the foreign policy establishment to select his Secretary of State-designate. Biden chose his longtime confidante Antony Blinken, who served as the former Deputy Secretary of State and Deputy National Security Advisor in the Obama administration and as then-Vice President Biden’s National Security Advisor. Blinken is a globalist who worries more about how other countries perceive America than how other countries, especially China, have manipulated multilateral institutions and agreements to the detriment of the American people.

Indeed, Blinken wants to re-engage with the Chinese regime to deal with such global threats as climate change and pandemics. Blinken seems oblivious to the fact that China has made these problems worse in pursuit of its goal to overtake the United States as the world’s number one superpower. China has continued to increase its greenhouse gas emissions to support its economic growth while expecting the U.S to cut its emissions. And China hid the truth about the coronavirus outbreak, which originated in China, during the outbreak’s early days when the virus could have been prevented from spreading worldwide.

Blinken has said that climate change will be “a number one priority” for a Biden administration. To drive this point home, Biden chose former Secretary of State John Kerry to serve as his special presidential envoy for climate. In that role Kerry will sit on the National Security Council, where he will have plenty of opportunity to spout off to a receptive audience that climate change is our preeminent national security threat.

During the Obama-Biden administration, Kerry was a prime mover behind engaging with China to enter into the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Kerry was swindled then. And now he is back. “America will soon have a government that treats the climate crisis as the urgent national security threat it is,” Kerry tweeted after Biden’s announcement. “I’m proud to partner with the President-elect, our allies, and the young leaders of the climate movement to take on this crisis as the President’s Climate Envoy.”

Through the artifice of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, China managed to maneuver the Obama-Biden administration into agreeing to severely handicap the U.S. economy. The Obama-Biden administration committed to make significant cuts in greenhouse gas emissions by 2025, through stifling, job-killing regulations. China meanwhile would be allowed to continue spewing more and more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere as it further accelerates its economic growth. President Trump wisely withdrew the U.S. from this con game. But Biden, with Blinken and Kerry by his side, intends to rejoin the Paris Agreement on Climate Change on day one of his administration and allow China to take us to the cleaners once again.

During an interview with the Hudson Institute last July, Antony Blinken admitted that “the status quo was really not sustainable particularly when it comes to China’s commercial and economic practices,” including “the lack of reciprocity in the relationships.” But Blinken, who left out his boss Biden’s part in helping to create this non-sustainable status quo in the first place, is ready to repeat the same mistakes while hoping this time for a more constructive response from China. That fits the classic definition of insanity, attributed to Albert Einstein, which is “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

Beginning in 2002, Blinken served for six years as Democratic Staff Director for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee when then-Senator Biden was committee chairman. Biden at the time was pushing for expanded trade with China within the framework of the rules-based World Trade Organization. Biden expected China to play by the rules and to reform its own government as it was integrated into the global economic system. That didn’t happen.

Nothing changed while Blinken was working closely with then-Vice President Biden as his National Security Advisor. Biden said in May 2011 that “a rising China is a positive, positive development, not only for China but for America and the world writ large.”

We know how that worked out. On Biden and Blinken’s watch at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and then during the Obama administration, a “rising China” has turned into an extremely negative development for “America and the world writ large.” Yet we are now supposed to believe that this same dynamic duo, together with John Kerry, will fix the mess that they helped create by reversing President Trump’s successful efforts to confront the “rising China” head-on. That’s like calling the arsonist to put out the fire.

During his Hudson Institute interview, Blinken said that “we are in a competition with China and there’s nothing wrong with competition if it’s fair.” Duh! The question is how to make it fair. Blinken offers more of the same conventional wisdom that he and the rest of the foreign policy establishment are so used to peddling.

“We need, in the first instance, to invest in our own competitiveness,” Blinken said. Until the China Virus came to our shores, the Trump administration had already restored the competitiveness of the American economy to new heights, including in manufacturing. But fair competitiveness requires a level playing field. And with China that means removing from the playing field China’s unfair trade practices and massive thefts of intellectual property. Blinken said during his Hudson Institute interview that a Biden administration will be tougher with China than in years past. But there is nothing in Biden’s long record of failures or in what Blinken recommended in his interview with the Hudson Institute that gives us any reason to believe him.

“We need to rally our allies and partners instead of alienating them to deal with some of the challenges that China poses,” Blinken suggested. Fine, but what happens if, out of fear, self-interest or both, they refuse to cooperate in taking on China’s increasingly aggressive behavior? Trump was willing to lead by example from the front with strong actions of his own. He had no use for collective cowardice with the U.S. leading from behind.

Blinken said during his Hudson Institute interview that “we need to be standing up for our values and put them back at the center of our foreign policy, not walk away from them.”  While Blinken no doubt intended this comment as a slap at the Trump administration’s focus on economic and national security issues with China, he is barking up the wrong tree. Trump did not walk away from our values. Far from it. Trump signed the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020. And the Trump administration followed through by imposing sanctions on several senior officials of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The list of sanctioned senior officials included a member of CCP’s most powerful political body, the 25-member Politburo.

The difference between Trump and the Biden-Blinken-Kerry foreign policy establishment is that Trump does not stop with high sounding rhetoric or meaningless symbolic gestures. He takes effective action.

Blinken makes the same mistake when it comes to defending the disastrous nuclear deal the Obama-Biden administration negotiated with Iran, with John Kerry leading the charge. Blinken sharply criticized the Trump administration’s decision to withdraw from the deal (known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA) and apply maximum economic pressure on the Iranian regime. “We’re heading right back to where we were before the agreement,” Blinken said, “which is a really terrible binary choice between either taking action to stop the program of all of the potential unintended consequences of doing that (sic) or doing nothing and allowing Iran to be in a breakout position where it can develop a nuclear weapon on very, very short order.”

However, we would be facing precisely the same “binary choice” Blinken worries about just a few years from now if the U.S. had remained in the JCPOA as originally negotiated. Obama himself admitted back in 2015 that once the deal’s restrictions on Iran’s use of advanced centrifuges are lifted, Iran would be able to break out to produce enough fissile material for a nuclear bomb in “almost zero” time by 2028 or so. All that the JCPOA did was to kick the can down the road for a short time. By then, Iran will be more militarily prepared to defend its nuclear weapons production facilities than it is now.

Dictatorships like the Chinese and Iranian regimes pay lip service to the rules of multilateral institutions such as the World Trade Organization and World Health Organization while regularly flouting them in practice. They enter into multilateral agreements such as the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and the JCPOA with every intention of manipulating them at the expense of their adversaries in a zero-sum game. With globalists like Antony Blinken and John Kerry around, Trump’s America First policies will be replaced by Biden’s sellout of America.

2.

Fighting Words

It’s a war.

By now it should be obvious – even to conservatives – that we are in a war. It is a conflict that began nearly fifty years ago when the street revolutionaries of the Sixties joined the Democrat Party. Their immediate goal was to help the Communist enemy win the war in Vietnam, but they stayed to expand their influence in the Democrat Party and create the radical force that confronts us today. The war that today’s Democrats are engaged in reflects the values and methods of those radicals. It is a war against us – against individual freedom, against America’s constitutional order, and against the capitalist engine of our prosperity.

Democrat radicals know what they want and where they are going. As a result, they are tactically and organizationally years ahead of patriotic Americans who are only beginning to realize they are in a war. The Democrats’ plan to steal the 2020 election was hatched many years ago when Democrats launched their first attacks on Voter I.D.s, and then every effort to secure the integrity of the electoral system. Those attacks metastasized into an all-out assault on Election Day itself with early- and late-voting grace periods, and a flood of 92 million mail-in ballots, hundreds of thousands of which were delivered in the middle of the night to be counted behind the backs of Republican observers after Election Day had passed.

The result of these efforts is that Election Day no longer really exists as a day when the votes are cast and counted. This is a fact that offers generous opportunities for the election saboteurs to do their work. Those saboteurs’ opportunities were greatly enhanced this year with the installation in battle ground states of voting machines specifically designed to calculate how many votes were required to steal an election and then to switch ballots already cast and deliver them to the chosen party. Mail-in ballots were indispensable to the realization of this plan.

I will not dwell at length on the years it took the Republican Party, and American patriots, to recognize what the Democrat Party had become or the threat it posed to our country as an enemy within. Suffice it to say that Republicans can still be heard referring to Democrats as “liberals” when it is obvious even to them that there is nothing liberal about their principles or methods. They are vindictive bigots who are actively destroying the First Amendment in our universities, on the Internet and in our once but no longer free press. Suffice it to note that while Democrats accuse Republicans including the President of being racists and traitors, the response of Republican leaders is this: “Oh, the Democrats are just playing politics.”

This is not “playing” people. It is war. They are trying to kill us politically, and we need to respond accordingly, to fight fire with fire. Today’s Democrat Party is a party of character assassins and racists. Republicans know this but are reluctant to say it. That is how a pathological liar and corrupt political whore like Joe Biden can accuse the choice of 73 million Americans of being a white supremacist and also murdering 220,000 corona virus patients. That’s why Biden and his gunslingers can do so with no consequences – without so much as a wrist slap – from “moderates” and independents, who know better. The Democrats’ ability to intimidate well-meaning Americans is that great.

Is this too blanket a condemnation? Where, then, is the Democrat who was outraged by the four-year Russia collusion hoax and the failed coup and impeachment attempts – all of which accused the president, without a shred of evidence, of treason? Where was the Democrat who dissented from the public lynching of an exemplary public servant, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, over an incident that never happened 37 years ago at a time when he was a high school kid? Where is the Democrat who has condemned the violent street criminals of Antifa and Black Lives Matter who got away with conducting the most destructive civic insurrection in American history, orchestrating mayhem and disrespect for the law that led to the murders of scores of people who happen to have been mainly black?

What follows is a basic vocabulary for understanding the political war that has engulfed us. When it is used by enough Americans who love their country, it will cancel the surreal universe that Democrats’ lies have imposed on us, and the war will be on its way to being won.

Democrats are not democrats; they are totalitarians. They have declared war on the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Electoral College, the Senate, the Supreme Court, the election system, and the idea of civil order. They have called for the Republican President of the United States to be de-platformed and jailed. Their obvious goal is a one-party state that criminalizes dissent. To them, support for such basic necessities as borders and law enforcement are racist. If you oppose their efforts to legalize infanticide, they will condemn you as enemies of women, and if you make videos of their confessions to selling body parts of murdered infants, they will – like Kamala Harris – throw you in jail.

Progressives are not progressive; they are reactionaries. They are out to abolish liberal value systems and create a status hierarchy where race, gender, and sexual orientation define and confine you to an unalterable place in their new social order. If you are white or male or heterosexual or religious – Justice Kavanaugh was all four – you are guilty before the fact.

But if you are a member of a designated (but increasingly imaginary) “victim” group you are innocent even when the facts show you are guilty – like the reprehensible female who lied to Congress in a calculated attempt to destroy Kavanaugh’s life and career. If you are a member of a “victim” group you have an unlimited license to persecute others. Thus, the LGBTQ lobby is currently behind a nation-wide crusade to strip Christians of their First Amendment rights and criminalize their religion. They use their victim status to leverage their hate of people who don’t embrace their agendas, and deploy it to crush them – and only Republicans seem to care.

Identity politics is a pure form of racism, yet Trump is the only Republican I’m aware of who has had the political spine to call a Democrat a racist. Identity “wokism” is a totalitarian politics because it encompasses every aspect of life, down to the pronouns one is ordered to use. The progressive police state will leave no space free.

Racists and aspiring totalitarians are what Democrats have become. The only moral principle they are guided by is the old Bolshevik saw, “the ends justify the means.” They will say anything however false and condone anything, however criminal, which advances their goal of maximum power.

Since race is the principal weapon wielded by Democrats, this is most evident in their claim that there is “systemic racism” in America, which needs to be rooted out even if it means destroying the very foundations of law and order. When two Republican canvassers refused to certify the election result in Detroit – a city once the richest in America but now mainly black and poor thanks to fifty-nine years of misrule by Democrats – they were accused of “systemic racism.” This charge and the accompanying threats by the Democrat mob were so intimidating the two withdrew their objections. But if there was in fact election fraud in Detroit, to object to it is not by any stretch of the imagination “systemic racism.” To believe otherwise is to believe that black people, due to their skin color, are incapable of committing election fraud. How racist is that?

“Systemic racism” is an assertion made reflexively by Democrats that is never accompanied by evidence. For good reason. Systemic racism has been outlawed in America since the Civil Rights Act of 1964. If there were actual instances of systemic racism in 2020, there would be lawsuits – plenty of them. Even making the racist assumption, which the Identity Politics crowd does make, that all white people are white supremacists by dint of their skin color, there are tens of thousands of black lawyers, prosecutors, district attorneys, attorneys general, and elected officials who would be filing lawsuits over a practice that is illegal. You never hear of massive lawsuits over systemic racism, because “systemic racism” is a myth. The myth lives because it is an indispensable weapon wielded by Democrats to advance their anti-democratic agendas and quests for power.

But the only reason Democrats are able to do this so successfully – even going so far as to justify the arson, looting and general destruction in more than 600 American cities this summer – is because Republicans, and conservatives generally, are too cowardly to confront them. This war will continue until patriotic Americans summon the courage to call Democrats the racists, liars, character assassins and aspiring totalitarians that they actually are. And to do so in so many words. Blowback works.

3.

Biden’s Transition Team Leans Radical Left

“Progressives” cement their Deep State.

 

The Biden-Harris Transition website identifies the members of the transition’s government agency teams who are responsible, according to the website, for “ensuring a smooth transfer of power, and preparing for President-elect Biden and Vice President-elect Harris and their cabinet to hit the ground running on Day One.” The list is full of leftist progressives as team leaders and members, presaging the left’s influence in cementing its own deep state to steer the Biden-Harris policy agenda its way.

The transition team leader assigned to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), for example, is Ur Jaddou. After serving as chief counsel at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) under then-President Barack Obama, Jaddou became the director of DHS Watch at America’s Voice. This left-wing pro-amnesty group calls for reforms to “put 11 million undocumented Americans on a path to full citizenship.” Biden is already on record supporting this sweeping amnesty program.

Jaddou was sharply critical of the Trump administration’s decision to deploy some agents from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to protect a federal court building in Portland Oregon from the rampaging mobs seeking to destroy it. Jaddou was upset by what she falsely claimed was CBP’s attacks on “peaceful protesters.“ Jaddou demanded that unless and until “Trump’s CBP” stops such attacks and there is “real reform and meaningful accountability, Congress should not appropriate any additional money to CBP or allow CBP to move its money around.”

In other words, Biden’s Department of Homeland Security transition team leader wants a radically transformed DHS where the use of DHS resources to secure federal property on American soil from mob violence is out of bounds.

According to Nick Miroff, who covers immigration enforcement and the DHS for the Washington Post, Jaddou “is viewed as a frontrunner for USCIS director.” If so, Jaddou can be expected to bring with her other members of her transition agency team who think like her. One example is Blas Nunez-Neto, a senior policy researcher at the RAND Corporation with previous experience advising the commissioner of Customs and Border Protection. Nunez-Neto advocates expanding the discredited catch and release program.

The Biden transition agency team leader for the Environmental Protection Agency is Patrice Simms, who served in the Obama administration and now works for the left-wing environmentalist group Earthjustice. Earthjustice is committed to ending the nation’s use of fossil fuels “and bringing about a swift and just transition to zero carbon emissions and 100% clean energy.”  Simms boasted that “Earthjustice has filed more than 110 lawsuits against the Trump administration’s efforts to gut environmental safeguards, and we are winning many of those fights long before they ever reach the Supreme Court.”

Climate activists are interspersed throughout various transition agency teams, beyond just the agencies most involved in environment-related issues such as the EPA, the Energy Department, Interior Department, and the White House Council on Environmental Quality. “Unlike past transitions, officials with significant climate or clean energy experience also pop up in departments like State, Defense, Treasury and Justice,” E&E News observed. “They’re even handling the transition at agencies that, so far, have been on the periphery of climate policy, like the Small Business Administration and the Federal Reserve.”

The Biden transition agency team leader for the National Security Council is Jeff Prescott, a former senior director for Iran on the National Security Council in the Obama administration. Prescott also served as then-Vice President Joe Biden’s deputy national security advisor. Prescott has since worked for National Security Action, an anti-Trump network made up, according to its website, of “former senior officials and policy experts, academics, and civil society leaders who are dedicated to a progressive vision of American global leadership.” Some of them were responsible for pushing forward the Obama administration’s disastrous nuclear deal with Iran, which they continue to defend.

Prescott shares the climate change alarmism of Patrice Simms’ Earthjustice. He wrote an article last year, for example, claiming that President Trump’s stance on climate change “is putting not just the United States, but the entire planet on the brink of meltdown.” Prescott’s willingness to coddle the Iranian regime could put the planet on the brink of nuclear meltdown.

Kelly Magsamen is one of the members on the Biden transition agency team for the National Security Council led by Prescott. She is the leftist Center for American Progress’s Vice President for National Security and International Policy. Magsamen has criticized President Trump’s maximum pressure campaign against the Iranian regime. She claimed that Trump “recklessly escalated tensions in the Middle East by ordering a strike on Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps General Qassem Soleimani.” The removal of Iran’s terrorist mastermind with American blood on his hands, who was putting into motion a plan to kill more Americans in Iraq until Trump stopped him, did not trigger a new war in the Middle East as Magsamen had feared.

Magsamen claimed that Trump’s approach to dealing with North Korea had exacerbated tensions. Precisely the opposite is true. Following President Trump’s outreach to Kim Jong Un, the North Korean regime has suspended its testing of nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles. Magsamen also criticized one of Trump’s most significant achievements on trade, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), because it “doesn’t go far enough on labor or environmental standards to make a real difference for working Americans.” Even Biden had to admit that USMCA was an improvement over NAFTA.

The Biden transition agency team leader for the intelligence community is Stephanie O’Sullivan. This former principal deputy director of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) in the Obama administration submitted an unmasking request for intelligence about Michael Flynn. Bob Litt, who served as general counsel for ODNI during the Obama administration and is now on the O’Sullivan-led intelligence transition team for Biden, reportedly discussed the idea of using the archaic Logan Act against Flynn as part of the Obama administration’s shameless persecution of Flynn.

The Biden transition agency team leader for the Department of Education is Linda Darling-Hammond, California Governor Gavin Newsom’s choice to serve as president of the State Board of Education. She has opposed merit pay for teachers, which makes her a friend of teachers’ unions. Darling-Hammond has “strong ties with the labor and the social justice communities,” said Bruce Fuller, an education professor at the University of California, Berkeley. Four members of her team are from national teachers’ unions. Emma Vadehra, a member of the Department of Education transition team, works for the Century Foundation, which lists as one of its top priorities for 2021 the expansion of high-quality free and debt-free college options financed by the federal government. It also advocates some form of student loan cancellation.

Gary Gensler is the Biden transition agency team leader for the Federal Reserve, Banking and Securities Regulators group of agencies. Gensler, who is currently a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, was chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission from 2009 to 2014. His appointment to lead this transition agency team “will likely calm the nerves of progressives who want Biden to take a hard line with the finance industry,” according to Politico.

As these examples demonstrate, leftist progressives populating Biden’s various government transition teams are poised to strongly influence the direction of key federal government agencies’ hiring decisions and policy priorities under a Biden-Harris administration. But they will never be satisfied until they secure complete control. It’s all about demanding payback from Joe Biden for supporting him in the election.

For example, various progressive climate change activist groups held a rally outside the Democratic National Committee building in Washington D.C. last Thursday, including the US Climate Action Network, the Sunrise Movement, the Climate Justice Alliance and the Indigenous Environmental Network. They were furious with Biden’s selection of Louisiana Rep. Cedric Richmond to serve as his senior adviser and director of the Office of Public Engagement because Richmond was considered too cozy with the fossil fuel industry.

“We don’t feel like we want to be in a confrontational pose, but if we need to, we will be,” said Keya Chatterjee, executive director of the US Climate Action Network. “Right now is the moment where a lot of decisions are being made about whether or not the right personnel are going to be in place to actually be ambitious in a green recovery and get done everything that they ran on.” (Emphasis added)

Democratic-Socialist Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and her fellow Squad members also took part in the rally and addressed their adoring fans. “We’re going to secure the basic tenets of a Green New Deal, a multi-trillion jobs program for climate, for environmental, racial, gender and class justice,” AOC declared. She urged continued pressure to make sure that Biden keeps his promises and “we have environmental justice front and center.”

New York Congressman-elect Jamaal Bowman, a Democratic-Socialist, was even more explicit. “Black and Brown communities organized across the country to make sure Joe Biden won the White House, and he did that, but now it’s time for payback,” Bowman said. (Emphasis added)

Climate change activists will expect a Biden-Harris administration to bow to their demands for “environmental justice” in return for the votes of “environmental justice communities” that they claim made Biden’s victory possible. Black Lives Matter movement activists will expect their demands for “racial justice” to be met in return for what they claim was their delivery of the election for Biden. And the same is true for the leftist progressives who demand as payback for their support that Biden-Harris embrace their policy agendas to achieve gender, class, LGBTQIA+ and intersectional “justice.”

More than 40 progressive groups, under the auspices of the Progressive Change Institute, have submitted to the Biden transition team 400 names of individuals the groups want considered for key government positions in a Biden-Harris administration. “This is a roadmap for how Biden can get a bold agenda done, even with Republican obstruction in the Senate,” said Stephanie Taylor, founder and Board President of the Progressive Change Institute. “And the way you do that is through the right personnel in place.”

According to Taylor, the plan is to place these individuals in agencies across the executive branch, such as the Office of Management and Budget, the Export Import Bank and the IRS, where they can advance the Green New Deal and other progressive initiatives “without requiring any act of Congress.”

In short, progressive leftists are plotting to cement their own version of the deep state inside the executive branch to end run Congress, no matter what happens in the Georgia Senate runoff elections. Only constitutionalist justices and judges can stop them.

4.

The Al-Qaeda Leader Elimination in Tehran Embarrasses Iran

The message to terrorists is that the U.S. and Israel don’t forgive or forget.

 

Arch-Terrorist Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah, also known by the name Mohammad al-Masri, a leading member of the Al-Qaeda terrorist group, was assassinated, apparently by Israeli agents, in Tehran, Iran, at the request of the U.S., or more specifically the CIA. The timing of the revelation was aimed to embarrass the radical Shiite-Muslim Iranian regime, just as the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) was about to deliberate on renewing the embargo against Iran. Moreover, exposing the fact that the Ayatollahs of Iran sheltered a leading al-Qaeda terrorist implicated in the 9/11 terrorist attack on the U.S. and other terrorist operations, should have given the UNSC pause to think about it. The Iranian regime, keeping the secret of harboring a notorious Sunni-Muslim, whose al-Qaeda organization targeted and murdered fellow Shite-Muslims, was bound to outrage many ordinary Iranians.

In a typical Taqiyyah Shiite form (meaning the practice of precautionary dissimulation or deceiving one’s enemy), the Iranian Foreign Ministry issued a statement denying the presence of any al-Qaeda members in Iran, accusing the U.S. and Israel of “trying to draw a link between Iran and such groups through falsification and the leakage of fabricated information in the media.”

Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah, the number two ranking official in al-Qaeda behind Ayman al-Zawahri, was the mastermind of the deadly 1998 attacks on the American embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, which killed 224 people and wounded hundreds more. He was also involved in the November, 2002 attack on Israeli tourists in an Israeli owned hotel in Mombasa, Kenya. It was actually a double attack. At the hotel the al-Qaeda terrorists killed 3 Israelis and injured 20. In addition, they attempted to bring down an Israeli Arkia passenger plane with a missile. The successful Israeli operation to liquidate Abdullah three months ago, and 22-years after al-Qaeda’s destruction of two U.S. embassies was meant to send a message to terrorists worldwide, that neither Israel nor America forgive or forget murderous terrorists’ acts against them.

According to Yoram Schweizer, head of the Terrorism Project of the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv, “When al-Qaeda began to carry out terrorist activities in the late 1990’s, Abdullah was one of the three Bin Laden’s closest associates, serving as head of the organization’s operations section.”

Abdullah’s death had been rumored, but never confirmed until now. Al-Qaeda has not announced his death even though he was one of its top leaders. The Iranians covered it up, fearing embarrassment and possible outrage. Killing their protected guest in the heart of Tehran’s “Pasdaran” neighborhood, the residence of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) leaders, would have exposed the weakness of the Iranian security apparatus. It would also show the hypocrisy of the regime that while fighting against an al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria’s Idlib province; it is harboring notorious al-Qaeda Sunni terrorists in Tehran.

Iran’s motivation in granting Abdullah refuge in Tehran was clearly self-serving and not merely Islamic charity. The Islamic Republic considered it a certain insurance policy that al-Qaeda would not operate inside Iran while their leader was detained there. Furthermore, they allowed Abdullah to freely operate against their common enemy – the United States. Of course, it was not the first time Shiite Iran joined forces with Sunni terrorists. Tehran still supports Arab Sunni-Muslim terrorist groups including Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Gaza, operating against Israel, and the Taliban in Afghanistan fighting against U.S. troops.

The curious question is why wouldn’t the CIA, with all of its unlimited resources, carry out this punitive action against a most wanted terrorist? The F.B.I. offered a $10 million reward for information leading to Abdullah’s capture. The answer is twofold. First, Israel has a tried and true operational infrastructure in Iran, and has proven it by successfully penetrating and severely damaging Iran’s nuclear project. Israel has also been able to eliminate leading Iranian nuclear scientists. Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu presented to the world the Iranian nuclear archive that Israeli Mossad agents were able to extract. It exposed Iranian cheating on the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or the nuclear agreement between Iran and the U.S., U.K. France, Germany, China and Russia) and its intention of building a nuclear arsenal. Secondly, Israel had a score to settle with Abdullah over the killing of the Israeli tourists in Mombasa.

The U.S. did eliminate a major and well-known Iranian terrorist last January – General Qasim Soleimani. Soleimani, the head of the elite Quds Force, was a close associate of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. He was also responsible for the death of many U.S. servicemen in Iraq and elsewhere. The U.S. did not however kill Soleimani in Iran, but rather in Iraq. It suggests that while Israel has an effective operational base in Iran, the U.S. does not. Hence, the CIA asked Israel to settle its score with Abdullah.

Close cooperation between U.S. and Israeli intelligence services is not new. One of the combined operations by the two intelligence services was in the elimination of the arch terrorist Imad Mughniyeh, the chief operational commander of Hezbollah who was done away with in February, 2008 in Damascus. Mughniyeh was behind the suicide bombing of the U.S. Marine compound in Beirut that cost the lives of 241 Marines. The same Mughniyeh was responsible for the bombing of the U.S. embassy in Beirut and the hijacking of a U.S. TWA jetliner, all in the 1980’s. For the Israelis, Mughniyeh was a ticking bomb with Israeli and Jewish blood on his hands.

Abdullah was much the same as Mughniyeh, with both Israeli and American blood on his hands. Born in 1963, and a native of Egypt, he became a professional soccer player in Egypt’s top league. Following the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, Abdullah joined the jihadist movement fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. While in exile (Egyptian authorities barred him from returning to Egypt) in Afghanistan, he joined Osama Bin Laden’s organization and became one of the founding members of al-Qaeda. In the early 1990’s, he joined Bin Laden in Khartoum, Sudan. In 1993, he helped Somali warlord Mohammad Farrah Aidid fight U.S. troops in Mogadishu, Somalia. Then, in 2003, following the operation in Mombasa, and fleeing from American capture after 9/11, he ended up in Iran, expecting to be out of reach for Americans and Israelis.

For American and Israeli societies, the sanctity of life is inviolable. America lives by the dictum “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” The terrorists violating this precious gift called life, especially innocent life, must know that the long arms of America and Israel will find them, and execute justice.

5. ΕΙΜΑΣΤΕ ΠΑΝΤΟΥ ΤΟΥΡΚΟΙ, ΜΕΤΑΝΟΕΙΣΤΕ!..

Ayasofya Camisi’nde Serafim Meleği figürü, vaiz kürsüsü ve mahfil yeniden gün yüzüne çıktı

Ayasofya-i Kebir Camii Şerifi’nde 2013’ten bu yana kurulu olan iskelenin sökülmesinin ardından alandaki Serafim Meleği figürü, tarihi vaiz kürsüsü ve mahfil de yeniden gün yüzüne çıktı.

6.

ΑΠΟΚΑΛΥΨΗ: ΝΤΕΡΜΠΙ ΜΕ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΙΟ ΠΑΡΑΤΗΡΗΤΗ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΝ ΠΡΟΕΔΡΟ ΤΗΣ ΣΟΥΠΕΡ ΛΙΓΚΑΣ ΕΠΙΚΕΦΑΛΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΑΟ!

ΑΠΟΚΑΛΥΨΗ: ΝΤΕΡΜΠΙ ΜΕ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΙΟ ΠΑΡΑΤΗΡΗΤΗ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΝ ΠΡΟΕΔΡΟ ΤΗΣ ΣΟΥΠΕΡ ΛΙΓΚΑΣ ΕΠΙΚΕΦΑΛΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΑΟ!
Πέμπτη, 26 Νοεμβρίου 2020 

«ΚΙ’ εμένα με βρίζανε, αλλά δεν το έκανα δα και θέμα» ***

*** ΟΠΩΣ διατείνεται η διοίκηση του ερασιτέχνη Παναθηναϊκού (Μαλακατές) τις εμπορικές χρήσεις εντός του γηπέδου θα τις εκμεταλλεύεται ο σύλλογος και τις εξωτερικές το κράτος * ΕΠΟΜΕΝΩΣ, όποιος θα θέλει να στήσει σουβλατζίδικο στο Βοτανικό, θα πρέπει να απευθύνεται στον δήμο Αθηναίων ***

*** ΑΛΛΟ θέμα βρήκανε τώρα για να… πνίξουν τον πόνο τους και να πάνε τα φαρμάκια κάτω οι βάζελοι με τους συνοδοιπόρους τους * ΟΤΙ βρήκανε το θέμα μπουλόνι, τον οποίο παρουσιάζουν σαν… κακοποιημένο (λεκτικά ) από ανθρώπους του Ολυμπιακού κατά τη διάρκεια των δηλώσεών του ΜΕΤΑ ΤΟ ΤΕΛΟΣ του ντέρμπι * ΚΑΙ, ούτε λίγο, ούτε πολύ, απαιτούν να… τιμωρηθεί αυστηρά ο Ολυμπιακός * ΟΧΙ κατ’ ανάγκη με… υποβιβασμό, αλλά… παραδειγματικά

*** ΓΙΑ να δούμε όμως τώρα πως ακριβώς έχει το θέμα, σύμφωνα με τις ΔΙΚΕΣ ΜΟΥ πληροφορίες, πού ως γνωστόν, ούτε διαψεύδονται, ούτε καν αμφισβητούνται * ΞΕΚΙΝΑΩ με τον παρατηρητή πού συνέταξε μία έκθεση συμβάντων και – όπως διαβάζω στα ρώσικα – «τα γράφει όλα» και δίνει όλες τις ευθύνες στον Ολυμπιακό

*** ΑΣ δούμε λοιπόν ποιος είναι ο παρατηρητής * ΠΡΟΚΕΙΤΑΙ για τον κ. Διονύση Δήμου, δικηγόρο ΑΠΟ ΤΗ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗ και ΟΠΑΔΟ του ΠΑΟΚ! * Ο ΚΑΘΕΝΑΣ μέχρις εδώ μπορεί να βγάλει τα (ΠΡΩΤΑ) συμπεράσματά του * ΔΕΝ τελειώσαμε όμως * ΠΟΙΟΣ όρισε τον κύριο αυτό από τη Θεσσαλονίκη παρατηρητή σε αγώνα ΝΤΕΡΜΠΙ του Ολυμπιακού; * ΑΠΑΝΤΗΣΗ: Η Σούπερ Λίγκα * ΚΑΙ ποιος είναι ΠΡΟΕΔΡΟΣ στη Σούπερ Λίγκα; * Ο… ΜΠΟΥΤΣΙΚΑΡΗΣ !

*** ΤΟΜΠΟΛΑ ; Όχι ακόμη * ΤΑ πιο ωραία είναι αυτά πού ακολουθούν * Ο ΣΥΓΚΕΚΡΙΜΕΝΟΣ πρόεδρος της διοργανώτριας του πρωταθλήματος, ΗΤΑΝ ΣΤΟ ΚΑΡΑΪΣΚΑΚΗ και περιεφέρετο στους διαδρόμους ΜΑΖΙ με τα μέλη της πράσινης αποστολής, φορώντας μάλιστα αθλητική περιβολή * Ο ΜΠΟΥΤΣΙΚΑΡΗΣ αναφέρονταν στην λίστα με τα δέκα ονόματα πού δικαιούται η κάθε ΠΑΕ να βάζει στο γήπεδο, με την ιδιότητα του αντιπροέδρου του Παναθηναϊκού

*** ΔΕΝ ξέρω πόσο… κομψό και δεοντολογικό μπορεί να το χαρακτηρίσει κάποιος, αλλά θα πρέπει να τονίσω πως ο ίδιος δεν προκάλεσε, όσο π.χ. προκαλούσε ένας Βλάχος πού είναι κάτι στον Παναθηναϊκό και απειλούσε θεούς και δαίμονες * ΣΥΜΦΩΝΑ όμως με τις δικές μου πάντα πληροφορίες, ο πρόεδρος της Σούπερ Λίγκας πού ΟΡΙΖΕΙ τους παρατηρητές Μπουτσικάρης, θεάθηκε να «ΠΟΛΙΟΡΚΕΙ» τον παρατηρητή Δήμου, από τη Θεσσαλονίκη κλ.π. κλ.π. * ΚΑΙ βέβαια, να σημειώσουμε ότι ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΠΕΙΘΑΡΧΙΚΟ ΟΡΓΑΝΟ πού θα επιληφθεί των εγγραφών του παρατηρητή Δήμου, ανήκει στη δικαιοδοσία της Σούπερ Λίγκ πού έχει τον Μπουστικάρη πρόεδρο * ΝΑ ΤΟΝ ΧΑΙΡΟΝΤΑΙ

Η ΑΛΗΘΕΙΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟ ΓΚΟΛ ΤΟΥ ΠΑΟΚ: ΑΝ ΔΕΝ ΗΤΑΝ ΤΟΥΜΠΑ ΚΑΙ 91′ ΘΑ ΕΙΧΕ ΑΚΥΡΩΘΕΙ ΜΟΝΗ ΛΥΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΣΙΔΗΡΟΠΟΥΛΟ ΚΑΙ ΣΚΟΥΛΑ ΝΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΠΑΡΟΥΝ ΤΗ ΣΦΥΡΙΧΤΡΑ!

*** ΤΟ θέμα πού αποτέλεσε αντικείμενο διαφωνίας (και έντασης, σύμφωνα με ορισμένα ρεπορτάζ) του αρχιδιαιτητή Κλάτενμπεργκ και του επονομαζόμενου και «κορυφαίου» ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΕΑ διαιτητή Σιδηρόπουλου, ήταν αν προϋπήρχε του δεύτερου γκολ του Πάοκ επιθετικό φάουλ του Τσόλακ σε αμυνόμενο του ΠΑΣ Γιάννινα * ΠΡΙΝ προχωρήσω στις επίμαχες κρίσεις, θα αναφέρω την δική μου ευθέως και ευθαρσώς, όπως πάντα

*** ΕΦ όσον προηγήθηκε ενός γκολ του Πάοκ, οι συγκεκριμένοι διαιτητές Σιδηρόπουλος και Σκουλάς δεν το θεώρησαν φάουλ * ΑΝ η ίδια φάση είχε συμβεί σε άλλο, ΑΝΥΠΟΠΤΟ χρονικό σημείο, οι ΙΔΙΟΙ διαιτητές θα υπεδείκνυαν χωρίς δισταγμό φάουλ * ΕΠΙΣΗΣ φάουλ θα το υποδείκνυαν και στην περίπτωση πού η ίδια φάση γινόταν στην αντίθετη περιοχή, πριν από γκολ του ΠΑΣ Γιάννινα στον Πάοκ * ΣΥΜΠΕΡΑΣΜΑ; Δεν βρίσκεις άκρη με τους ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ διαιτητές και δη, σε περίοδο επικυριαρχίας των «εξυγιαντικών» δυνάμεων στο ελληνικό ποδόσφαιρο

*** ΤΑ σφυρίγματα, οι υποδείξεις και οι «τελικές κρίσεις» μέσω της τεχνολογίας (VAR) συνήθως δεν ακολουθούν τους κανόνες παιδιάς ή τους κανονισμούς διαιτησίας, αλλά τα επί μέρους συμφέροντα ομάδων πού πατρονάρουν τους «λειτουργούς» της διαιτησίας και οι κατά περίπτωση καταστάσεις * ΠΑΡΑΔΕΙΓΜΑ: Αν ΔΕΝ ΗΤΑΝ ΤΟΥΜΠΑ, αν ΔΕΝ ΗΤΑΝ το 91′ του αγώνα και αν ΔΕΝ ΚΙΝΔΥΝΕΥΕ ο Πάοκ με ΟΔΥΝΗΡΗ ΙΣΟΠΑΛΙΑ πού θα τον άφηνε ΠΟΛΥ ΠΙΣΩ στη βαθμολογία, οι διεθνείς Σιδηρόπουλος και Σκουλάς θα δεχόντουσαν ποτέ να επικυρώσουν ένα γκολ πού στηρίχτηκε πάνω σε ΔΥΟ προηγηθείσες ΚΡΑΥΓΑΛΕΕΣ ΠΑΡΑΒΑΣΕΙΣ;

*** ΕΙΜΑΙ κάτι παραπάνω από βέβαιος, ότι όχι απλώς θα ακυρωνόταν το γκολ, αλλά δεν θα είχε πεί ποτέ η μπάλα στα δίχτυα, αφού δεν θα είχε φτάσει ποτέ στον Ελ Καντουρί, για να κάνει το ψαλιδάκι του * Η ΦΑΣΗ θα είχε σταματήσει ΠΟΛΥ ΠΡΙΝ, με το ΕΠΙΘΕΤΙΚΟ ΦΑΟΥΛ του Τσολάκ

*** ΤΙ σημαίνουν όλα αυτά πού διαβάσατε παραπάνω; * ΟΤΙ οι δυό διαιτητές ΔΕΝ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ να σφυρίζουν σε αγώνες του ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟΥ τουλάχιστον πρωταθλήματος * ΚΑΙ δεν είναι οι μόνοι * ΤΟ αν είναι καλοί και αν αξίζουν, μπορούν κάλλιστα να πάνε να το δείξουν τους αγώνες ΞΕΝΩΝ ομάδων πού τους ορίζουν η Ουέφα και η Φίφα * ΕΔΩ, σ’ αυτό το μέρος της γής πού παίζεται ποδόσφαιρο, ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΠΟΔΕΚΤΟΙ και εννοώ την ΣΥΝΤΡΙΠΤΙΚΗ ΠΛΕΙΟΨΗΦΙΑ των Ελλήνων φίλων του αθλήματος

ΔΕΝ ΦΟΒΟΥΝΤΑΙ ΤΙΠΟΤΑ – ΔΕΝ ΥΠΟΛΟΓΙΖΟΥΝ ΚΑΝΕΝΑ ΓΙΑΤΙ… ΑΠΟΛΑΜΒΑΝΟΥΝ ΑΝΩΘΕΝ ΠΡΟΣΤΑΣΙΑΣ

*** ΤΟ ότι διαιτητές τύπου Σιδηρόπουλου απολαμβάνουν ΑΝΩΘΕΝ ΠΡΟΣΤΑΣΙΑΣ από άτυπες «αρχές» προστασίας, με αποτέλεσμα να μη φοβούνται τίποτα και κανένα, αποδεικνύεται και από τους αποκαλυφθέντες διαλόγους μεταξύ του συγκεκριμένου και του αρχιδιαιτητή Κλάτενμπεργκ * Η ΑΠΟΨΗ του τελευταίου, ήταν η εξής : * «Η ΚΕΔ δεν δέχεται την απόφαση του VAR ότι δεν υπάρχει φάουλ, καθώς ξεκάθαρα βλέπει ότι η μπάλα ήταν εντός παιχνιδιού όταν ο επιτιθέμενος τράβηξε από το χέρι τον αμυνόμενο για να κερδίσει έδαφος ώστε να μπορέσει να αναπτύξει την επιθετική του κίνηση και η ομάδα του να σημειώσει γκολ * Η ΠΑΡΑΒΑΣΗ θα έπρεπε να τιμωρηθεί με φάουλ υπέρ του αμυνόμενου»

*** ΑΥΤΑ είπε ο Κλάτενμπεργκ, με αποτέλεσμα να υπάρξει οργισμένη αντίδραση του «κορυφαίου» Σιδηρόπουλου: «ΕΣΥ δεν μας έλεγες πως δεν υπάρχει επιθετικό φάουλ στο Ολυμπιακός – Απόλλων με Λισγάρα και Χασάν;» * ΑΝΤΙΓΡΑΦΩ τη συνέχεια όπως δημοσιεύτηκε σε εξειδικευμένα ρεπορτάζ: * «Ο ΑΓΓΛΟΣ αρχιδιαιτητής απάντησε ότι εκείνη η φάση ήταν διαφορετική και ο διάλογος συνεχίστηκε ΜΕ ΕΝΤΑΣΗ και τον κορυφαίο Ελληνα ρέφερι να είναι αυτός πού αντέδρασε περισσότερο από κάθε άλλον, μέχρι να ακουστεί το «boolshit» του Κλάτενμπεργκ, πού επέμενε ότι πρόκειται για επιθετικό φάουλ

ΥΠΟΤΑΓΗ ΜΕΧΡΙ … «ΣΤΡΑΤΕΥΣΗΣ» ΣΤΟΥΣ ΕΞΥΓΙΑΝΤΕΣ!

*** ΠΡΟΣΕΞΤΕ τώρα τα πιο σημαντικά σημεία των παραπάνω συμβάντων * ΠΡΩΤΟΝ, ο Σιδηρόπουλος ΕΣΠΕΥΣΕ να αναφέρει σαν παράδειγμα – επιχείρημα δικαίωσής του, ΤΙ ; * ΕΝΑ ΓΚΟΛ ΤΟΥ ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΥ, πού αμφισβητήθηκε έντονα από ΣΥΓΚΕΚΡΙΜΕΝΑ ΜΜΕ, πού ΥΠΟΚΕΙΝΤΑΙ στην επιρροή του Πάοκ και κατ’ επέκταση των «εξυγιαντών» * Ο ΑΡΧΙΔΙΑΙΤΗΤΗΣ είπε ΠΟΛΥ ΣΩΣΤΑ ότι εκείνη ήταν ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΤΙΚΗ φάση, κάτι πού ΠΟΤΕ δεν θα έπρεπε να αμφισβητήσει ένας διεθνής και εμπειρότατος ρέφερι * Ο ΣΙΔΗΡΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ όμως όχι μόνο το αμφισβήτησε, αλλά και ΣΥΝΕΧΙΣΕ με επιμονή και πείσμα, προκαλώντας ΕΝΤΑΣΗ, να αναφέρεται στο ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΟ από πάσης φύσεως επιχείρημα περί φάουλ του Χασάν

*** ΤΟ δεύτερο ενδιαφέρον σημείο, είναι πως ο Κλάτενμπεργκ, πού έχει τοποθετηθεί εδώ ως ΑΠΟΛΥΤΟ ΑΦΕΝΤΙΚΟ στη διαιτησία ΑΝΕΧΤΗΚΕ την έντονη αντίδραση του Σιδηρόπουλου* ΔΗΛΑΔΗ, ενός διαιτητή πού, ΑΝ ΜΗ ΤΙ ΑΛΛΟ, έχει και ένα ΠΟΛΥ ΠΕΡΙΕΡΓΟ ΠΑΡΕΛΘΟΝ υπέρ του Πάοκ, είτε σε αγώνες αυτής της ομάδας, είτε σε αγώνες των … ανταγωνιστών της * ΚΑΙ όποιος ψάξει στο διαδίκτυο (π.χ. χθεσινό άρθρο του to10.gr), θα καταλάβει τι εννοώ

*** ΦΥΣΙΚΑ, ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΜΟΝΟΝ ο Σιδηρόπουλος * ΟΥΤΕ είναι μόνον αυτός και ο Σκουλάς, ή και ο Τζήλος, ο Ευαγγέλου, ο Φωτιάς και μερικές … δεκάδες άλλων * Η ΥΠΟΤΑΓΗ μέχρι βαθμού… «στράτευσης» των Ελλήνων διαιτητών στις «εξυγιαντικές» δυνάμεις, είναι πλέον ο ΚΑΝΟΝΑΣ στην ΠΟΙΟΤΗΤΑ και την ΜΕΡΟΛΗΠΤΙΚΗ διάθεση στις διαιτησίες τους * ΜΕ λίγα λόγια, η κατάσταση με την ΚΑΘΟΔΗΓΟΥΜΕΝΗ διαιτησία είναι πλέον ΜΗ ΑΝΑΣΤΡΕΨΙΜΗ * ΚΑΙ η αντιμετώπιση της ΝΟΣΗΡΗΣ αυτής κατάστασης, δεν μπορεί ποτέ να στηρίζεται σε ΗΜΙΜΕΤΡΑ ή μεθόδους ΑΝΟΧΗΣ

*** ΑΝ ο Κλάτενμπεργκ ΗΘΕΛΕ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙ να «φτιάξει» την ελληνική διαιτησία και να δείξει αποφασισμένος να χτυπήσει το κακό στη ρίζα του, θα έπρεπε να ΕΙΧΕ ΔΙΩΞΕΙ από τον πίνακα διαιτητών Σούπερ Λίγκ τους ΣΚΟΥΛΑ και ΣΙΔΗΡΟΠΟΥΛΟ * (ΦΥΣΙΚΑ και για να είμαι ειλικρινής, θα έπρεπε να είχε διώξει από ΠΙΟ ΠΡΙΝ τους ΜΙΣΟΥΣ το λιγότερο από τους διαιτητές πού έχουν προηγηθεί να ΑΠΟΠΑΤΟΥΝ στο κουφάρι της διαιτησίας ΕΙΔΙΚΑ σε αγώνες των λεγόμενων ψευδεπίγραφα “BIG4”) * ΕΠΕΙΔΗ όμως αιτία και αφορμή της κατάστασης πού δημιουργήθηκε είναι οι δύο προαναφερόμενοι, δικαιολογημένα θα μπορούσε ΚΑΛΛΙΣΤΑ να γίνει έστω και τώρα, η αρχή με αυτούς τους δύο

BIG FOUR ΜΕ ΑΡΗ ΚΑΙ ΧΩΡΙΣ ΠΑΟ

*** ΥΠΑΡΧΟΥΝ πάντως λύσεις για μία καλύτερη μέρα στη διαιτησία * ΜΙΑ εξ αυτών, η ΠΙΟ ΠΡΟΣΙΤΗ, είναι η χρησιμοποίηση ΜΟΝΟΝ ΞΕΝΩΝ διαιτητών σε αγώνες του Ολυμπιακού, του Πάοκ, της Αεκ και του Αρη * ΔΗΛΑΔΗ των τεσσάρων ομάδων πού προηγούνται στη βαθμολογία και πού ΜΕ ΒΕΒΑΙΟΤΗΤΑ θα διεκδικήσουν (ας το πούμε) τις τέσσερις πρώτες θέσεις στη βαθμολογία

*** ( ΚΑΙ ξεκαθαρίζω, για να μη δημιουργούνται ψευδαισθήσεις * Ο ΠΑΝΑΘΗΝΑΪΚΟΣ δεν ανήκει πλέον και εδώ και πολύ καιρό στους τέσσερις «δυνατότερους» του ελληνικού ποδοσφαίρου * ΚΑΘΕ ορισμός ξένου διαιτητή σε αγώνες του Παναθηναϊκού, είναι ΤΖΑΜΠΑ ΠΕΤΑΜΕΝΑ ΛΕΦΤΑ, είναι μάταιο έξοδο * ΑΝ αποφασιστεί να ορίζονται ξένοι στους αγώνες της Λαμίας, του Βώλου, να ορίζεται και στον Πόα * ΟΧΙ όμως κάτω από τον ΑΠΑΤΗΛΟ μανδύα του μέλους των BIG4.

ΟΛΙΣΤΙΚΗ ΜΕΛΕΤΗ: ΜΙΑ ΑΛΛΗ ΑΠΟΨΗ, ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΤΙΚΗ

*** «ΑΓΑΠΗΤΕ Μανώλη, Προσωπικά δεν είμαι τόσο απαισιόδοξος για την περίφημη ολιστική μελέτη * ΚΑΤ’ αρχήν δεν ήταν ποτέ δυνατόν μια διεθνής ανεξάρτητη ομοσπονδία να “αναθέσει” σε ένα κράτος την τακτοποίηση του τοπικού παραρτήματος της * ΘΑ ήταν μια άμεση παραδοχή πως η ίδια δεν μπορεί να το ελέγξει * ΠΡΑΓΜΑ που θα “άνοιγε την όρεξη” σε πολλές κυβερνήσεις να κάνουν το ίδιο

*** ΚΑΙ με μια δεύτερη σκέψη, δεν θα ήταν και τόσο σοφό να καθιερωθεί η δυνατότητα στις κυβερνήσεις να τις ελέγχουν άμεσα * ΚΑΘΕ φορά που θα άλλαζε η κυβέρνηση ( για να μην πω ο υπουργός), θα είχαμε το “έλα να δεις” * ΕΔΩ το είχαμε ΧΩΡΙΣ την “επίσημη” δυνατότητα παρέμβασης…

*** ΕΠΙ της ουσίας οι FIFA/ UEFA ζητούν συνεχείς μηνιαίες συναντήσεις ΚΑΙ με την κυβέρνηση για να παρακολουθήσουν την πρόοδο των αλλαγών * ΚΑΙ ζητούν αλλαγή του τρόπου συγκρότησης της ΓΣ της ομοσπονδίας, πράγμα πολύ σημαντικό * ΝΟΜΙΖΩ πως οι σημερινοί “ποδοσφαιροπατέρες” δεν έχουν περιθώρια αμφισβήτησης και ελιγμών * ΑΛΛΩΣΤΕ -όπως λες- δεν είναι αυτοί που κάνουν κουμάντο, απλά όργανα είναι * ΚΑΙ επειδή οι πραγματικοί κουμανταδόροι δεν μπορούν να παίζουν … κατενάτσιο για πολύ καιρό, θα φροντίσουν να βρουν τα νέα στελέχη που θα “πληρούν τις προϋποθέσεις”

*** ΒΕΒΑΙΑ μην περιμένουμε… θαύματα * ΚΑΝΕΝΑΣ χώρος δεν ήταν καθαρός και ούτε πρόκειται να είναι * ΑΝ καταφέρουμε το λιγότερο βρώμικος, καλά θα είναι…» Alexander Kotsanas (alexkots18@gmail.com)***

ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ ΠΟΥ ΗΤΑΝ… ΕΠΕΝΔΥΣΗ

*** «ΛΕΝΕ, αγαπητέ μου Μανώλη, πως ο… κορυφαίος (Σιδηρόπουλος) στιγματίστηκε που ο Κλάτεμπεργκ είπε πως το δεύτερο γκολ του ΠΑΟΚ ήταν φάουλ * ΕΓΩ νομίζω, πως όχι μόνο δεν στιγματίστηκε, αλλά η απόφασή του ήταν “επένδυση” για τον ίδιο * ΜΕ τη σύμφωνη γνώμη του Κλάτεμπεργκ ο… κορυφαίος ευνόησε τον ΠΑΟΚ * ΕΤΣΙ όταν αποστρατευθεί από την Αστυνομία, θα φύγει από τη Ρόδο και θα γυρίσει στη Θεσσαλονίκη για να προσληφθεί στην αγαπημένη του ομάδα από τους Ρώσους.

*** ΘΑ εργασθεί για το… καλό του ΠΑΟΚ, από άλλο πόστο αυτή τη φορά, δίπλα στους συναδέλφους του Τεβεκέλη, Σαραϊδάρη, Μπίκα και Κάκο * ΚΑΙ κοντά σ’ αυτούς θα ακολουθήσουν κι άλλοι με επικεφαλής το Τζήλο και τ’ άλλα παιδιά * ΑΚΟΜΑ και παρέλαση στο Λευκό Πύργο μπορούν να κάνουν * ΕΙΝΑΙ τόσοι πολλοί * ΔΙΜΟΙΡΙΑ απαρτίζουν οι ρώσικες σφυρίχτρες» Παρασκευή Παρασκευάς (poros20142014@yahoo.gr) ***

ΠΟΤΣ ΓΚΕΝΕΝ;

*** ΑΓΑΠΗΤΕ φίλε, Μου προξενεί ΚΑΤΑΠΛΗΞΗ η δημοσίευση της ΑΠΟΡΡΗΤΗΣ ( πως γκένεν τούτο ) έκθεσης που εκθέτει τους οικονομικούς διαχειριστές της ΕΠΟ * ΠΩΣ και αφέθηκαν στην τύχη τους, από τους ΠΡΟΣΤΑΤΕΣ τους ; * ΠΙΣΤΕΥΩ ότι πολλοί βλέπουν μόνο το τυρί και όχι τη φάκα * ΕΓΩ περιμένω ΑΝΑΤΡΟΠΗ, κάτι σαν το διπλό ημίχρονο άσσος τελικό που ΕΠΑΝΑΛΑΜΒΑΝΕΤΑΙ πολύ συχνά τελευταία» Μιχαήλ Σοφιανόπουλος ( msofian3@gmail.com ) ***

7.

Hürriyet Gazetesi İlk Sayfası

8.

PKK’nın elebaşısı Murat Karayılan İsrail basınına ağladı! CHP itirafı

İsrail basınına konuşan terör örgütü PKK’nın elebaşlarından Murat Karayılan, Washington yönetimine seslenerek “Bizi terör listesinden çıkarın” çağrısında bulundu. Karayılan, “AK Parti ile MHP ittifakına karşı çıktığı için CHP ile aynı fikirdeyiz” ifadelerini kullandı.

27.11.2020
Terör örgütü PKK‘nın elebaşlarından Murat Karayılanİsrail basınından The Jerusalem Post’a röportaj verdi.

TERÖRİSTE ÖVGÜLER DİZİLDİ

Habere, sözde örgüt liderine “Kürdistan’dan bir ses, Türk güçlerine karşı mücadeleyi anlatıyor” diye övgüler dizilerek başlanırken, Türkiye‘nin örgüte son zamanlarda ciddi darbeler vurduğu hatırlatıldı ve “Yakın zamanda çözüme dair hiçbir işaret yok” yorumunda bulunuldu.

ABD’YE ÇAĞRIDA BULUNDU

Verdiği röportajda kendilerini Kürtlerin bir temsilcisiymiş gibi göstermeye kalkışan örgütün lideri, ABD’den kendilerini terör listesinden çıkarmaya çağırdı. ABD’nin Türkiye ile terör örgütü PKK arasında ara bulucu rolü oynama ihtimaline ilişkin bir soru üzerine ise Karayılan, ABD ve Avrupa’nın İrlanda’da (İrlanda Kurtuluş Ordusu ve İngiltere arasında) yaptığı gibi, (Türkiye ile PKK arasında da) “bir barış anlaşmasına aracı olabileceğini” söyledi.

İRAN DA BİZİ ÇOK SERT ŞEKİLDE VURUYOR”

Gazetenin “İran” sorularına da cevap veren Karayılan, Türkiye’yi işgalci güç olarak tanımlayarak, İran ve Suriye’nin de aynı adımları attığını belirtti. Teröristbaşı, PKK’nın İran kolu olan PJAK’ın Tahran yönetimi tarafından çok sert bir şekilde vurulduğunu itiraf etti.

ÇÖZÜM SÜRECİ ÜZERİNDEN ALGI YARATMAYA ÇALIŞTI

Ceylanpınar’da evinde yatan 2 polisi yatağında şehit edip çözüm sürecini bitiren terör örgütünün sözde yöneticisi, sanki Erdoğan süreci bitirmiş gibi bir algı yaratmaya çalışarak, “Dolmabahçe’de resmi bir anlaşmaya vardık ve silahsızlanma sürecine başladık. Daha sonra 18 Mart 2015’te Erdoğan, ‘anlaşma yok’ diyerek süreci bitirdi” ifadelerini kullandı.

Sırrı Süreyya Önder, Öcalan'ın mektubunu Diyarbakır'da okumuştu.

Sırrı Süreyya Önder, Öcalan’ın mektubunu Diyarbakır’da okumuştu.

SİLAH BIRAKMAK İÇİN SÖZDE ÖCALAN ŞARTI

2012 yılında terör örgütünün sözde lideri Abdullah Öcalan‘ın PKK’ya gönderdiği ve “Artık silahlı mücadele dönemi sona ermiştir” ifadelerinin yer aldığı mektupla örgütün silah bırakmasını istemesine rağmen, terör örgütü PKK’nın, silah bırakmak bir yana silah biriktirdiği ortaya çıkmıştı. Şimdi ise Karayılan, batı basınına şirin görünme çabaları içinde yaptığı çağrı ile Öcalan’ın serbest kalması durumunda silah bırakabileceklerini iddia etti.

“CHP İLE AYNI FİKİRDEYİZ”

Röportajda PKK elebaşına “Atatürk’ün ideallerine karşı çıkmanıza rağmen, CHP gibi Atatürk’ün vizyonuna daha yakın olan partilere şimdi daha mı yakınsınız?” sorusu soruldu. AK Parti-MHP ittifakına karşı olduklarını söyleyen Karayılan, “CHP, Kürt meselesine gelince AK Parti’yle aynı fikirde ama biz AK Parti ile MHP arasındaki ittifaka karşı çıktıkları için başka konularda da CHP ile hemfikiriz” cevabını verdi.

KAYNAK: HABER7
 SABIR MURAT SABIR!
9.

NATO’da Türkiye’ye karşı hain plan! Almanya ve Fransa bir oldu…

Güney Kıbrıs’ı, uluslararası anlaşmalara aykırı biçimde üyeliğe alan AB, şimdi de NATO için benzer hesaplar peşinde. Almanya ve Fransa, Güney Kıbrıs ve Avusturya gibi NATO üyesi olmayan ülkelerin zirvelere davet edilmesini öneren bir rapor hazırladı. Hedef Türkiye’nin vetosunu aşıp Rumları arka kapıdan NATO’ya dahil etmek.

NATO'da Türkiye'ye karşı hain plan! Almanya ve Fransa bir oldu...
27.11.2020 

 

Almanya’nın, NATO ile Avrupa Birliği (AB) arasındaki işbirliğini güçlendirme kılıfı altında skandal bir rapor hazırladığı ortaya çıktı.

Raporla ilgili çalışmanın, Fransa Cumhurbaşkanı Emmanuel Macron’un bir yıl önce Türkiye’nin Barış Pınarı harekâtını hedef alan ve “NATO’nun beyin ölümü gerçekleşmiştir” çıkışının ardından başladığı belirtildi.

AB ülkeleri arasında NATO’ya üye olmayan ülkeler Güney Kıbrıs’ın yanısıra Avusturya, Finlandiya, İrlanda, Malta ve İsveç. Deutsche Welle’nin Alman dpa ajansından derlediği habere göre Almanya Dışişleri Bakanı Heiko Maas’ın girişimiyle oluşturulan uzmanlar komisyonu raporunu tamamlayarak önceki gün üye ülkelere gönderdi.

Fransa’nın eski dışişleri bakanlarından Hubert Védrine’in de komisyonda yer aldı. Habere göre rapor, sözde NATO içinde siyasi işbirliği ve iletişimi güçlendirmek üzere 140 tavsiye içeriyor.

NATO-AB İLİŞKİSİ KILIFI

Eski bakan ve diplomatların da aralarında bulunduğu uzmanlar tarafından hazırlanan rapordaki öneriler arasında, NATO üyesi olmayan AB ülkelerin devlet ve hükümet başkanlarının NATO zirveleri çerçevesinde yapılan görüşmelere davet edilmesi yer alıyor. Bu öneri, NATO ile AB arasında işbirliğinin daha da güçlendirilmesi hedefi kılıfıyla sunuluyor. Gerçek amacınsa Güney Kıbrıs ve Avusturya’yı arka kapıdan NATO’ya sokmak olduğu anlaşılıyor. Türkiye, 2017 yılında Avusturya’nın NATO ile ortaklık programlarına dahil edilmesini veto etmişti.

TÜRKİYE’NİN VETOSUNU ENGELLEME HEDEFİ

NATO gündemine sokulmak istenen raporda yer alan öneriler arasında üye ülkelerin ittifak kararlarını veto etmesinin zorlaştırılması da yer alıyor. Bu teklifte hedefin Türkiye’nin ittifak içindeki veto kartını zayıflatmak olduğu değerlendiriliyor. Raporda, İttifak içindeki karar alma süreçlerini hızlandırmak üzere üst düzey siyasi görüşmelerin artırılması ve bu görüşmelerin sadece Brüksel’deki NATO merkezinde değil, bakanlar düzeyinde üye ülkelerde de gerçekleştirilmesi tavsiye ediliyor. Raporda örnek olarak dışişleri bakanlarının ek toplantılar yapabileceği ya da terörle mücadele konusunda içişleri bakanlarının toplanabileceği belirtiliyor.

GELECEK SALI MASADA İDDİASI

Habere göre NATO merkezinden dpa’ya yapılan açıklamada raporun merkeze teslim edildiği teyit edildi. Komisyonun önerilerinin önümüzdeki hafta Salı günü yapılacak NATO dışişleri bakanlarının toplantısında ilk kez üst düzeyde masaya getirileceği ileri sürüldü.

SKANDAL MAKALENİN ORTAKLARI

Almanya Dışişleri Bakanı Heiko Maas ve Fransız mevkidaşı Jean-Yves Le Drian, geçen hafta Türkiye’ye karşı ortak hareket edilmesi için çağrıda bulunmuştu. Fransız Le Monde, Alman Die Welt ve Amerikan Washington Post gazetesinde yayınlanan skandal makalede iki bakan, Türkiye’nin “öngörülemez bir ülke” olduğunu iddia etmiş ve ABD’nin seçilmiş başkanı Joe Biden’a seslenerek, “Türkiye’nin Doğu Akdeniz’de ve başka yerlerde büyük sorunlar oluşturan davranışları karşısında ortak bir çizgi belirlememiz gerekecek” ifadelerini kullanmışlardı.

KAYNAK: YENİ ŞAFAK

10.

Trump’tan dikkat çeken ‘ayrılık’ açıklaması!

ABD Başkanı Donald Trump, Seçiciler Kurulu’nun Biden’a oy vermesi halinde Beyaz Saray’dan ayrılacağını söyledi.

Son dakika: Trump'tan dikkat çeken 'ayrılık' açıklaması!
27.11.2020 

 

ABD Başkanı Donald Trump seçilmiş başkan Joe Biden’ın, Seçiciler Kurulu tarafından resmi olarak kazanan ilan edilmesi halinde Beyaz Saray’dan ayrılıp ayrılmayacağı sorusuna, “Kesinlikle ayrılacağım” yanıtını verdi.

Trump aynı zamanda seçimlerde büyük bir hile yapıldığı iddiasını yinelerken, “Sadece halkıma şunu söylemek istiyorum; henüz hayal kırıklığına uğramayın çünkü bu yarış daha bitmedi” ifadelerini kullandı.

Trump, 3 Kasım’daki başkanlık seçimlerinden sonra, Pazartesi günü resmi geçiş sürecinin başlatılmasına izin vermişti.

SEÇİCİLER KURULU NEDİR?

Başkanlık seçimlerinde seçmenler, doğrudan başkan adayına değil, eyaletin Seçiciler Kurul üyelerine oy veriyor. Ardından üyeler, ABD’nin başkanını ve başkan yardımcısını seçiyor.

11.

Trump’tan çok sert eleştiri: Üçüncü dünya ülkesiyiz

ABD Başkanı Donald Trump, Seçiciler Kurulunun Joe Biden’ın başkanlığını kesinleştirmesi durumunda bunun yanlış bir adım olacağını ancak yine de Beyaz Saray’ı bırakacağını söyledi.

Trump'tan çok sert eleştiri: Üçüncü dünya ülkesiyiz
27.11.2020 

 

Trump, Beyaz Saray’da Şükran Günü dolayısıyla ülke dışında görev yapan Amerikan askerleri ile gerçekleştirdiği video konferans sonrası gazetecilere açıklamalarda bulundu.

Georgia’da ikinci tura kalan ve Senatonun kontrolünün Cumhuriyetçilerde mi yoksa Demokratlarda mı olacağını belirleyecek seçimlere değinen Trump, Cumhuriyetçi senatör adayları için büyük ihtimalle cumartesi günü Georgia’da miting yapacağını duyurdu.

Trump, Demokratların seçimlere hile karıştırdığı ve asıl kazananın kendileri olduğu iddialarını da yineleyerek, “Bildiğim bir şey var ki o da Joe Biden‘ın gerçekte 80 milyon oy almadığı. Ayrıca Biden, Barack Obama’nın siyahi oy rekorunu da kıramadı.” diye konuştu.

“SEÇİM SİSTEMİ ALTYAPISINDA ÜÇÜNCÜ DÜNYA ÜLKESİ GİBİYİZ”

Ülkede seçim sonuçlarını belirleyen Seçiciler Kurulunun, kazananın Biden olmasını onaylaması durumunda görevi bırakıp, bırakmayacağının sorulması üzerine Trump, “Seçim sonuçlarını kabullenmek zor çünkü ortada büyük çaplı bir usulsüzlük var. Seçiciler Kurulu, Biden’ın başkanlığını onaylarsa yanlış yapar ancak tabii ki Beyaz Saray’ı bırakırım, bunu biliyorsunuz.” ifadesini kullandı.

Trump, seçimlerde Demokratların usulsüzlük yaptığı konusunda ısrarını sürdürerek, “Seçim sistemi altyapısında üçüncü dünya ülkesi gibiyiz.” yorumunda bulundu.

Joe Biden’ın başkanlığının kesinleşmesi durumunda 20 Ocak’taki göreve başlama törenine katılıp katılmayacağı sorusuna ise Trump, “Bunun cevabını biliyorum ama şimdi bir şey söylemeyeceğim.” yanıtını verdi.

ABD‘DE BAŞKANI SEÇİCİLER KURULU BELİRLİYOR 

ABD’deki başkanlık seçimlerinde “Seçiciler Kurulu” adı verilen sistemde, her eyalete farklı ağırlıklarla dağıtılmış toplam 538 delege bulunuyor.

Seçmenler sandıkta esasen doğrudan başkan adayına değil, eyaletin bu Seçiciler Kurulu üyelerine oy veriyor. Eyalette en fazla oyu hangi parti alırsa, önceden belirlenen bu delegeler daha sonra ABD’nin başkanı ve başkan yardımcısını resmen seçiyor. 538 sayısının yarıdan 1 fazlasına, yani 270 delegeye ulaşan aday, başkan olmaya hak kazanıyor.

Ülkede 3 Kasım’da yapılan 59. Başkanlık seçimlerini resmi olmayan sonuçlara göre 306 delegeyle Biden kazanmış, Trump ise 232 delegede kalmıştı. Seçimlerde hile olduğunu iddia eden Trump, seçim sonuçlarını kabul etmediğini açıklamış ve hukuki yollara başvuracağını belirtmişti.

12.

İran’ı sarsan suikast! Trump ve Netanhayu’dan flaş açıklama!

Son dakika haberi: İran’ın nükleer programının mimarlarından bilim insanı Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, Tahran eyaletine bağlı Abserd ilçesinde düzenlenen terör saldırısı sonucunda hayatını kaybetti. Devrim Muhafızları Komutanı, İranlı bilim insanlarının öldürülmesinin intikamını alacaklarını söyledi. ABD Başkanı Donald Trump ve İsrail Başbakanı Netanyahu’dan da dikkat çeken açıklama geldi.

Son dakika: İran'ı sarsan suikast! Trump ve Netanhayu'dan flaş açıklama!
27.11.2020

İran devlet televizyonu, İranlı nükleer fizikçi Fahrizade’nin öğleden sonra Abserd ilçesinde düzenlenen terör saldırısında ağır yaralandığını ve kaldırıldığı hastanede hayatını kaybettiğini duyurdu.

Yapılan açıklamada, “Maalesef doktorlar, yıllar boyunca verdiği bilim mücadelesi ile  şehit mertebesine yükselen Fakhrizadeh’i kurtarmayı başaramadı” ifadelerini kullandı.

ZARİF’TEN AÇIKLAMA: İSRAİL‘İN ROLÜNE DAİR CİDDİ BELİRTİLER VAR

İran Dışişleri Bakanı Zarif, nükleer fizikçi Fahrizade’ye yönelik terör saldırısında İsrail’in rolü olduğuna dair ciddi belirtiler bulunduğunu söyledi.

İran Dışişleri Bakanı Muhammed Cevad Zarif Twitter hesabından yaptığı paylaşımda, İranlı nükleer fizikçi ve Savunma Bakanlığı Bilimsel Araştırma Kurumu Başkanı Muhsin Fahrizade Mahabadi’nin suikast sonucu öldürülmesini kınayarak, “Teröristler bugün İran’ın önde gelen bilim insanını öldürdüler” ifadelerini kullandı. Zarif, suikastta İsrail’in rolü olabileceğine işaret ederek, “Saldırıda İsrail’in parmağı olabileceği ciddi bir şekilde görülüyor. Avrupa ve uluslararası toplumun bu konuda çifte standart yapmamasını ve terör saldırısını kınamasını bekliyoruz” dedi.

NETENYAHU BİR SUNUMDA FAHRİZADE’DEN BAHSETMİŞTİ

İran nükleer programının mimarı olarak tanınan Muhsin Fahrizade’nin adı İsrail Başbakanı Benyamin Netanyahu’nun Mayıs 2018’de İran nükleer programı hakkında yaptığı sunumda özellikle belirtilmişti.

NETANYAHU: GERGİN GÜNLER BİZİ BEKLİYOR

İsrail Başbakanı Binyamin Netanyahu, “İran nükleer programının babası” olarak bilinen Muhsin Fahrizade’nin suikast sonucu öldürülmesiyle ilgili itiraf gibi açıklamalarda bulundu.

Orta Doğu’da bir hareketlenme olduğunu dile getiren Netanyahu, “Gergin günler bizi bekliyor” dedi.

TRUMP’TAN DİKKAT ÇEKEN YORUM

ABD Başkanı Donald Trump, İran’ın nükleer programının kilit isimlerinden Muhsin Fahrizade’nin suikast sonucu öldürülmesine ilişkin haberleri paylaşarak bilim insanının ölümüne dikkati çekti.

Trump’ın, Melman’ın hem İbranice hem de İngilizce, “İran’dan gelen haberlere göre Muhsin Fahrizade, Tahran’ın doğusundaki Damavend’de suikast sonucu öldürüldü. İran’ın gizli nükleer programının başındaki isimdi ve Mossad tarafından yıllardır aranıyordu. Onun ölümü, psikolojik ve mesleki açıdan İran için büyük bir darbedir.” mesajını takipçileriyle paylaşması dikkati çekti.

İNTİKAM YEMİNİ

Devrim Muhafızları Komutanı, İranlı bilim insanlarının öldürülmesinin intikamını alacaklarını söyledi.

SAVUNMA BAKANLIĞI DOĞRULADI

Söz konusu olaya yönelik ilk resmi açıklama İran Savunma Bakanlığı tarafından yapıldı.

Açıklamada, nükleer fizikçi ve Savunma Bakanlığı Bilimsel Araştırma Kurumu Başkanı Muhsin Fahrizade Mahabadi’nin uğradığı saldırı sonrası yaralı bir şekilde hastaneye kaldırıldığı, doktorların tüm müdahalelerine rağmen hayatını kaybettiği bildirildi.

Nükleer fizikçi ve Savunma Bakanlığı Bilimsel Araştırma Kurumu Başkanı Muhsin Fahrizade

Nükleer fizikçi ve Savunma Bakanlığı Bilimsel Araştırma Kurumu Başkanı Muhsin Fahrizade

OPERASYON BAŞLATILDI

İran İstihbarat Bakanı Mahmud Alevi, İranlı nükleer bilimci Muhsin Fahrizade Mahabadi suikastını gerçekleştirenlere yönelik yakalama operasyonunun başlatıldığını duyurdu.

İran İstihbarat Bakanı Mahmud Alevi, nükleer bilimci ve İran Savunma Bakanlığı Bilimsel Araştırma Kurumu Başkanı Muhsin Fahrizade Mahabadi’nin suikast sonucu öldürülmesine ilişkin taziye mesajı yayınladı.

Alevi, Mahabadi’nin suikast sonucu öldürülmesinden büyük bir üzüntü duyduğunu belirterek, “Bu büyük bilim insanının ölümü nedeniyle tüm İranlılara baş sağlığı diliyorum” ifadelerini kullandı.

‘İSRAİL, TRUMP DÖNEMİ BİTMEDEN SAVAŞ PEŞİNDE’

İran dini lideri Ayetullah Ali Hamaney’in askeri danışmanı Hüseyin Dehkan, İranlı nükleer bilimci Muhsin Fahrizade Mahabadi suikastını gerçekleştirenlerin pişman olacağını belirterek, “İsrail, Trump’ın siyasi ömrünün son demlerinde İran’a karşı baskıyı artırarak büyük bir savaş çıkarmak peşinde” dedi.

13.

Cumhurbaşkanı Yardımcısı Oktay: Milli füzenin seri üretimi başladı

Cumhurbaşkanı Yardımcısı Oktay, “Türkiye’nin ilk milli hava-hava füzesi GÖKTUĞ’da uçak üzeri testlere, ilk milli deniz füzemiz ATMACA’da seri üretim sürecine başlanmıştır. Mini akıllı mühimmatlarımız ile güdüm kitlerimizin üretim, teslimat ve ihracatları sürmektedir” dedi.

27.11.2020
Cumhurbaşkanı Yardımcısı Fuat Oktay, TBMM Plan ve Bütçe Komisyonu’nda, “Dijital Türkiye Platformu üzerinde Kasım 2020 itibarıyla 51,5 milyon kullanıcı sayısına erişilmiş olup, 691 kurum ve kuruluşa ait toplam 5 bin 287 hizmet sunulmaktadır.” dedi.

Oktay, “Yatırım Ofisi öncülüğünde, 2020 yılı Ekim sonuna kadar toplam değeri 388 milyon dolar olan toplam 18 yatırım projesi faaliyete geçmiştir.” diye konuştu.

CİMER’E 5 MİLYON BAŞVURU

“İletişim Başkanlığı bünyesinde faaliyetlerine devam eden, vatandaş ile devlet arasında köprü vazifesi gören CİMER’e yapılan başvuru sayısı 2020 yılı Ekim ayı sonu itibarıyla yaklaşık 5 milyon olarak gerçekleşmiştir.” diyen Fuat Oktay, “Başvuruların yüzde 90’ı cevaplanmış olup, bu süre zarfında kurumların ortalama işlem süresi 16 gün olarak gerçekleşmiştir.” ifadesini kullandı.

GÖKTUĞ VE ATMACA’NIN SERİ ÜRETİMLERİ BAŞLADI

Cumhurbaşkanı Yardımcısı Oktay, “Türkiye’nin ilk milli hava-hava füzesi GÖKTUĞ’da uçak üzeri testlere, ilk milli deniz füzemiz ATMACA’da seri üretim sürecine başlanmıştır. Mini akıllı mühimmatlarımız ile güdüm kitlerimizin üretim, teslimat ve ihracatları sürmektedir” dedi.

“2021 yılı itibarıyla AKINCI, AKYA, KARAOK ve ATMACA projelerimizde teslimat faaliyetlerine başlamayı, TCG ANADOLU’yu envantere almayı planlıyoruz.” diyen Oktay, şunları söyledi:

“(Savunma Sanayii) 2019 yılında sektörün cirosu yaklaşık 11 milyar dolar, ihracat tutarı ise 3 milyar dolar seviyesine ulaşmış olup yürütülen savunma projesi sayısı 700’ü aşmıştır.

ATAK helikopterimiz, BAYRAKTAR TB2 ve ANKA İHA’larımızın seri üretim ve teslimatları devam ederken, GÖKBEY helikopterimiz ve AKINCI İHA’nın seri üretimine yönelik test faaliyetlerinde son aşamaya gelinmiştir.”

MİT OPERASYONLARI HAKKINDA

Cumhurbaşkanı Yardımcısı Oktay, “MİT Başkanlığımızca gelişmelerin doğru ve anlık takibi ile ön alıcı istihbarat üretildiğini, zamanında ve etkili istihbarat çalışmaları yürütüldüğünü, yurtiçinde ve yurtdışında başarılı ve sonuca ulaşan operasyonel faaliyetler gerçekleştirildiğini memnuniyetle müşahede etmekteyiz.” dedi.

14.

Katar hız kesmiyor! 400 milyar doları aştı

Körfez ülkesi Katar, ülkenin petrol ve doğalgaz gelirlerini yönetmek amacıyla kurduğu Katar Yatırım Otoritesi aracılığıyla yurt dışında 400 milyar doları aşkın yatırım gerçekleştirdi.

Katar hız kesmiyor! 400 milyar doları aştı
 27.11.2020

 

Sıvılaştırılmış doğalgaz (LNG) zengini Katar, 40’dan fazla ülkede 400 milyar dolardan fazla yatırım gerçekleştirirken, pek çok tanınmış dünya markasının da hissedarları arasında yer alıyor.

Katar’ın yurt dışında yaptığı yatırımlar ve satın almalarının arkasında olan Katar Yatırım Otoritesi’nin (QIA) Borsa İstanbul’un yüzde 10’luk hissesinin devri için anlaşma imzalaması, bu ülkenin yurt dışındaki yatırımlarını yenidengündeme getirdi.

AA muhabirinin derlediği bilgilere göre, ana gelir kaynağı doğalgaz olan Katar, pek çok tanınmış dünya markasının hissedarları arasında yer alıyor. Katar’ın 40’dan fazla ülkedeki yatırımlarının değerinin de son dönemde borsalardaki yükselişle 400 milyar dolardan fazla olduğu hesaplanıyor.

2005’de ülkenin petrol ve doğalgaz gelirlerini yönetmek ve ülke ekonomisini çeşitlendirerek güçlendirilmek amacıyla kurulan QIA’nın yurt dışında yaptığı yatırımların çoğunun stratejik sektörlerde ve uzun vadeli olması dikkati çekiyor. QIA’nın, altyapı, perakende, sağlık, bankacılık, otomotiv, spor, yatırım bankacılığı, gayrimenkul ve inşaat, turizm, tarım, ham madde ve ticaret sektörleri gibi çeşitli alanlarda yatırımları bulunuyor.

Dünyanın en zengin ülkeleri arasında yer alan Katar, özellikle Avrupa’da gayrimenkule, lüks markalara ve futbol kulüplerine yaptığı yatırımlarıyla dikkati çekiyor.

Ulusal Varlık Fonu Enstitüsü’ne göre (SWFI), QIA, dünyanın en büyük 11’inci ulusal varlık fonu konumunda.

Öte yandan, diğer Körfez ülkeleri yatırımlarda daha çok kendi ülkelerine odaklanırken, Katar, bölge ülkeleri arasında yurt dışında en fazla yatırım yapan ülke olarak öne çıkıyor.

Uluslararası Para Fonu (IMF) ve Dünya Bankası (WB) verilerine göre, dünyanın üçüncü büyük gaz rezervine sahip ülkesi olan Katar, Bursa’dan daha küçük bir nüfusa sahip olmasıyla da dikkati çekiyor.

2 milyon 832 bin nüfusu bulunan Katar, gaz ve petrol fiyatlarının düşük seyretmesine rağmen, satın alma gücü paritesine (SGP) göre geçen yıl kişi başına milli gelirde yaklaşık 97 bin dolarla ülkeler arasında ilk sıralarda yer aldı.

QIA’nın yatırım portföyünde ilk sıralarda ise Almanya, İngiltere, Fransa, ABD, Çin, Rusya, Avustralya ve Türkiye yer alıyor.

Katar Yatırım Otoritesi, konumu, güçlü bankacılık sistemi, büyümeyi destekleyen demografik yapısı nedeniyle son yıllarda odağına aldığı Türkiye’de, özellikle finans, medya, enerji ve gayrimenkul alanlarına yatırım yapıyor.

Katar’ın ülke ve bölgelere göre yatırım portföyü şöyle şekilleniyor:

Katar

QIA aynı zamanda kendi ülkesindeki birçok kuruluşun doğrudan sahibi ya da ortağı konumunda bulunuyor.

Otorite, Katar’ın başkenti Doha’daki Hamad Uluslararası Havalimanı, Katar Havayolları, Katar borsası, Katar Ulusal Bankası S.A.Q ve telekom operatörü Ooredoo QSC’de en büyük yatırımcı olarak dikkati çekiyor.

Avrupa

Avrupa, uzun zamandır Katar’ın yatırımları için en önemli destinasyonlardan biri olmasıyla dikkati çekerken, QIA, kıtada otomobil, gayrimenkul, teknoloji, finans, sağlık ve moda şirketlerine ile futbol kulüplerine milyarlarca avroluk yatırım gerçekleştirdi.

Katar, Avrupa’nın en büyük ekonomisine sahip olan Almanya’da son 30 yılda Volkswagen, Deutsche Bank, Siemens, Hochtief ve SolarWorld gibi şirketlere 20 milyar avrodan fazla yatırım yaptı.

2022 Dünya Kupası’na ev sahipliği yapmaya hazırlanan Katar’da, Siemens, Deutsche Bahn ve birçok uluslararası Alman şirketi altyapı projeleri gerçekleştiriyor.

2008 finansal krizi sırasında Barclays Plc ve Credit Suisse Group AG’ye milyarlarca dolarlık yatırım yapan QIA, Deutsche Bank AG’nin sermayesini desteklemek için de 2014’te Alman bankasının hissedarı oldu.

QIA’nın yan kuruluşu Qatar Holding de Alman otomobil üreticisi Volkswagen AG’de yüzde 14,6’lık pay ile en büyük hissedarlar arasında yer alıyor.

2011’de Fransa’nın köklü takımlarından Paris Saint Germain’i satın alan QIA, takıma David Beckham’ın transferi de dahil milyonlarca avroluk yatırım yaptı. QIA, İtalyan lüks markası Valentino Fashion Group SpA’yı da Mayhoola for Investments SPC adlı bir yatırım şirketi aracıyla yaklaşık 700 milyon avroya satın aldı.

İngiltere

Yatırım konusunda daha çok Batı Avrupa ülkelerine yönelen Katar’ın İngiltere’de de 40 milyar sterlinden fazla yatırımı olduğu hesaplanıyor. Bunların arasında Londra’nın en ünlü yerlerinden HSBC kulesi, Shard Gökdeleni, Olimpiyat Köyü, Harrods mağazası, Savoy Oteli ve finans sektörünün bulunduğu Canary Wharf bölgesindeki hisseleri bulunuyor.

Katar’ın İngiltere’de yatırımları sadece gayrimenkulle sınırlı değil. Ülkenin büyük süpermarket zincirlerinden Sainsbury`nin yüzde 22 hissesi ve Londra Heathrow havaalanının yüzde 20 hissesi de QIA’da bulunuyor. Katar Havayolları da British Airways’in sahibi IAG SA’nın yüzde 20’sini elinde bulunduruyor.

Londra Borsası’nda (London Stock Exchange-LSE) yüzde 10,3 ile en büyük hissedarlar arasında QAI dikkati çekiyor. LSE, son olarak New York merkezli finansal piyasa verileri sağlayıcısı Refinitiv’i 27 milyar dolara satın almıştı.

Rusya

QIA, Rusya’nın en büyük petrol üreticisi “Rosneft”in yüzde 18,93 hissesini 11 milyar dolara satın alırken, ülkenin üçüncü büyük havalimanı olan St. Petersburg Havalimanı’na da 2018 yılında yaklaşık yüzde 25’lik hissesini alarak ortak oldu.

ABD

Katar Yatırım Otoritesi, 2015’te New York’ta bir ofis açarak bu ülkede de yatırımlarını çeşitlendirme yoluna gitti. New York ve Los Angeles’ta özellikle ofis olmak üzere birçok gayrimenkule yatırım yaparken, Empire State Building’in sahibi Empire State Realty Trust Inc.’in yaklaşık yüzde 10’unu satın aldı.

QIA, Brookfield Property Partners LP ile New York’da yaklaşık 9 milyar dolarlık bir gayrimenkul projesi geliştirdi.

Otorite’nin başta Singapur olmak üzere Asya ülkelerinde de gayrimenkul ve teknoloji şirketlerinde hissesi bulunuyor.

ABD ve Asya pazarlarına toplamda 55 milyar dolarlık yatırım hedefi

Katar Yatırım Otoritesi, özelikle başarı yakalanan ülkelerde pazarları çeşitlendirmeye yöneliyor.

QIA, 2016’da açıkladığı 5 yıllık Asya ve ABD piyasasına yönelik yatırım stratejisinde, ABD pazarı için yaklaşık 35 milyar dolar yatırım yapmayı planlarken, Asya pazarları, özellikle Hint ve Güneydoğu Asya pazarlarında yaklaşık 20 milyar dolarlık yatırım hedeflemişti.

Katar’ın en fazla gaz sattığı Çin pazarı için de yaklaşık 10 milyar dolarlık yatırım planı bulunuyordu.

Katar eş-Şark Gazetesinin yayınladığı bilgilere göre Doha’nın yatırım yaptığı kıtalar ve bazı ülkeler şunlar: “Avrupa’da Portekiz, İspanya, Fransa, İngiltere, Almanya, Hollanda, İsveç, Ukrayna, Türkiye, Yunanistan, Güney Amerika’da Brezilya, Arjantin; Kuzey Afrika’da Mısır, Tunus, Fas; Güney Afrika’da Kenya, Sudan, Uganda; Orta Doğu’da Suriye, Lübnan; Asya’da Çin, Tacikistan, Pakistan, Hindistan, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Tayland, Malezya, Endonezya, Filipinler, Rusya; Kuzey Amerika’da ABD ve Okyanusya’da Avustralya.”

KAYNAK: AA

15.

Başkan Erdoğan’a büyük övgü: Dünyadaki tek lider

Arnavut gazeteci-yazar Anisa Bahiti, tüm dengelerin sorgulandığı ağır ekonomik, sağlık ve siyasi kriz döneminde, tüm insanlara cesaret ve direniş çağrısında bulunan dünyadaki tek siyasi liderin Türkiye Cumhurbaşkanı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan olduğunu ifade etti.

Başkan Erdoğan'a büyük övgü: Dünyadaki tek lider
27.11.2020 

Bahiti, dijitalleşme, sanal dünya ve dijital faşizm konularını ele aldığı “Küresel Dijital Faşizme Karşı Özgür İnsanların Lideri” başlıklı yazısında, Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan ve Türkiye hakkında övgü dolu ifadeler kullandı.

Hayatın, doğanın, güzelin ve iyinin büyüsünün bozulduğunu, gerçeküstü bir çağda yaşandığını savunan Bahiti, “Bu çağda dünya nüfusu arttı ve hayatımız basitleşti ancak insanlar özgürlüğünü kaybetti, dijital birer yaratığa dönüştü.” görüşünü paylaştı.

Kovid-19 krizi ile bunun daha belirgin hale geldiğini belirten Bahiti, bu süreçte insanların evden çalışıp eğitim gördüğünü, yakınlarıyla bilgisayar üzerinden iletişime geçtiğini, fikirlerini sadece sosyal medya üzerinden paylaştığını ve hayatın, işin, stresin ve dinlenmenin de sanallaştığını ifade etti.

Bahiti, çalışmak, eğitim almak, seyahat etmek ve üretmek için internete bağlı olmak zorunda kalınırsa insanların özgürlüğünü kaybedeceğini ve böylece dünyanın her tarafında “kontrollü bir özgürlük” olacağını öne sürdü.

Geçen yüzyıl İtalya ve İspanya’daki faşizmin, Almanya’daki Nazizm’in ve Japonya’daki militarizmin, özgürlük ve refah adına iktidara geldiğini ancak sadece trajedi ve yıkım getirdiğini anlatan Bahiti, yazısında şunları kaydetti:

‘ERDOĞAN, DÜNYADAKİ TEK LİDER’

“Tüm dengelerin sorgulandığı bu ağır ekonomik, sağlık ve siyasi kriz döneminde, dünyadaki tüm insanlara cesaret ve direniş çağrısında bulunan, başta inanç ve yaşama özgürlüğü olmak üzere özgürlüğe ‘evet’, dijital faşizme ise ‘hayır’ diyebilen dünyadaki tek siyasi lider Türkiye Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’dır.”

‘AVRUPA’NIN DA TÜRKİYE’YE İHTİYACI VAR’

Bu dönemin, Türkiye’nin Doğu’dan gelen göçmen akınına karşı Avrupa’yı savunduğu bir dönem olduğunu vurgulayan Bahiti, “NATO üyesi olarak Türkiye, dünyanın en gelişmiş ve en iyi yaşam kalitesine sahip olmaya devam etmesi yönünde, Avrupa için de bir garanti olarak Arap dünyası, İran ve Rusya sınırındaki ön cepheye yöneldi.” değerlendirmesinde bulundu.

‘ERDOĞAN’A KARŞI MÜCADALE EDİYORLAR’

Bahiti, Avrupa liderliği kinizminin, dünya enerji güvenliğini kontrol etme arzusu tarafından hükmedildiği bir dönemin içinde olduklarını kaydederek, “Bu kinizm, bugünkü Türkiye’nin büyük rolünü desteklemek yerine, Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’ı diktatörlükle suçlayarak ona karşı mücadele ediyor ve onu küçümsüyor.” ifadelerini kullandı.

Bu dijital faşizm döneminde Türkiye’nin, Avrupa ile yıllardır NATO’daki gibi coğrafi ve siyasi anlamda da birlikte olmak istediğini belirten Bahiti, “Elbette ki Türkiye’nin Avrupa’ya ihtiyacı varsa Avrupa’nın da Türkiye’ye ihtiyacı vardır.” görüşünü paylaştı.

16. 

Cihat Yaycı’dan çarpıcı açıklamalar! Türk gemisine baskında kumpas başarılı olsaydı…

Doğu Akdeniz’de Türk yük gemisine baskının kumpas olabileceğini değerlendiren Müstefi Tümamiral Cihat Yaycı, ‘Bu olayın arkasında Türkiye’yi savaş suçlusu ilan etmeye çalışan FETÖ olabilir.’ dedi. Yaycı ayrıca FETÖ kumpasın başarılı olması durumunda Türkiye’ye yaptırım uygulanması ve Türkiye’yi yönetenlerin savaş mahkemesinde yargılanmasının da önünün açılacağını ifade etti.

27.11.2020 

 

Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Denizcilik ve Global Stratejiler Merkezi Başkanı Müstafi Tümamiral Cihat YaycıYunan komutan yönetimindeki bir Alman fırkateyninde bulunan İtalyan Özel Kuvvetleri’nin Libya’ya insani yardım malzemesi taşıyan Türk bandıralı Roseline A gemisine düzenlediği baskının arka planını Aydınlık’a anlattı.

Alman ve İtalyan makamlarının FETÖ tarafından aldatıldığını belirten Amiral Yaycı, “Türkiye’ye yaptırım uygulanması için uluslararası bir kumpas kurulmuştur ve bu kumpasın arkasında başka birileri var. Burada Almanya ve İtalya’yı bu işe ikna eden yalancı bir ihbar ve kumpas mekanizması var. Bunun adı FETÖ’dür. 1.5 senedir Türkiye’yi savaş suçlusu yapmak için çalışan FETÖ’dür. Amaçları Türkiye’ye hem yaptırım uygulatmak hem de yöneticileri savaş mahkemesinde yargılatmaktır” dedi.

Amiral Cihat Yaycı şu değerlendirmelerde bulundu:

“KORSANLIK HORTLATILMAKTADIR”

“Açık denizlerin serbestisi ilkesi vardır. Birleşmiş Milletler Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi (BMDHS) ve teamül hukukuna göre gemiler, açık denizlerde serbestçe intikal ederler. Açık denizler karasularının ötesindeki denizlerdir. Karasularının ötesindeki denizlerde gemiler ancak ve ancak bayrak devletinin yönetsel ve yargısal yetkisi altındadır. BMDHS’nin 110. maddesinde buna istisnai durumlar, yani gemilerin ne zaman durdurulup aranabileceği ortaya konulmuştur. Bu istisnai şartlar dışında gemilerin aranması söz konusu bile olamaz. Roma’da 1988 yılında denizde seyir emniyetini tehlikeye atacak durumlar için Sua Sözleşmesi imzalanmış ve 2005 yılında bazı değişiklikler yapılmıştır.

Bu Sözleşme’nin 8. maddesinde ‘Bir gemi köle ticareti yapıyorsa, deniz haydutluğu yapıyorsa, uyuşturucu ticareti yapıyorsa, bayrak tabiyetinden farklı bir bayrak taşıyorsa ve bunlar hakkında çok somut deliller bulunuyorsa; gemiler durdurulabilir, 4 saatlik bir süre içinde ilgili bayrak devletinden cevap beklenir, bayrak devletinden cevap gelmez ise gemiye çıkılabilir’ denilmektedir. Ama bunun için somut delil olması lazım. Burada somut delil yok, somut ihbar yok. Arkas Denizcilik senelerin denizcilik şirketidir, son derece deneyimli ve repitasyonu çok pozitif olan uluslararası bir firmadır. Gemi kaptanı aramaya izin vermiyor ve şirket derhal durumu bizim ilgili makamlarımıza bildiriyor.

Sahil Güvenlik Komutanlığı ve Ulaştırma Bakanlığı Ana Arama Kurtarma Merkezi’den cevap gelmeden gemiye çıkılıyor. Gemide tam 16 saat kalınıyor. Gemiler bayraklarını taşıdıkları devletlerin toprağı sayılırlar. Türk toprağına izinsiz ve konsensus oluşmadan çıkmışlardır. Bu, uluslararası hukuka tamamen aykırıdır. 1856 yılında devlet eliyle yapılan korsanlık yasaklanmıştır. Artık görüyoruz ki Avrupa eliyle korsanlık yeniden hortlatılmaktadır.”

“İRİNİ’NİN HEDEFİ TÜRKİYE’DİR”

“İrini Harekatı, aslında Aya İrini Harekatı’dır. Önceki ismi de Aya Sophia’dır. Her ikisi de Türkiye için bir anlam ifade etmektedir. Bu bir rastlantı değil. Bu harekattan kastın Türkiye olabileceği anlaşılıyor. Eğer amaç Birleşmiş Milletler’in silah ambargosunun denetlenmesi ise, Hafter’e havayolu ve karayolu ile giden silahların da denetlenmesi gerekir. Ulusal Mutabakat Hükümeti, Avrupa Birliği ile böyle bir anlaşmaya imzacı olmamıştır.

Dolayısıyla Avrupa Birliği bu ambargonun denetlenmesi için yetkili bir merci değildir. Bu tamamen hukuksuz bir operasyondur. Kendi kendine durumdan vazife çıkartarak ve Türkiye’yi hedef alarak başlatılan bir operasyondur. Bu harekatın sahadaki komutanı Yunan’dır. Gemi Alman gemisidir ve Alman komutan emrindedir. Gemimize çıkan Özel Kuvvetler ise İtalyan’dır. Bunların hiçbiri ülkelerine sormadan hareket etmez. Yunan komutan emir verdikten sonra Alman gemisi milli makamlarına sorup yetki almıştır, İtalyan tim komutanı da mili makamlarına sormuştur ve onay almıştır. İster NATO’da ister BM’nin operasyonlarında olalım, mutlaka milli makamlardan müsaade istenir. Sadece müttefik makamın yada harekat komutasındakinin dediği yapılmaz.”

“ARKASINDA FETÖ VAR”

“Burada amaç şudur: Avrupa Birliği’nin 10-11 Aralık’ta yapacağı zirvede Türkiye’ye yaptırım uygulanması için Yunan ve Rum makamların büyük baskısı var. Böyle bir durumda eğer ki bir silah bulunmuş olsaydı, o zaman yaptırım kararı için somut bir dayanak elde edeceklerdi. Hiçbir deniz subayı, hiçbir amiral normal şartlar altında bunu yaptırmaz. Ama o kadar eminler ki bir şey bulacaklarından, bulduklarında yaptıkları hukuksuzlukların hiç gündeme gelmeyeceğini, buldukları şeyin gündem olacağını düşünüyorlardı.

Bu hedef ellerinde patladı ve aslında Türkiye’ye bir kazanç olarak döndü. Türkiye’ye yaptırım uygulanması için uluslararası bir kumpas kurulmuştur ve bu kumpasın arkasında başka birileri vardır. Burada Almanya ve İtalya’yı bu işe ikna eden yalancı bir ihbar ve kumpas mekanizması var demektir. Bunun adı FETÖ’dür. 1.5 senedir Türkiye’yi savaş suçlusu yapmak için çalışan FETÖ’dür. Bunların bir takım tivitleri var: Türkiye’nin silah taşıdığı, BM ambargosunu deldiği yönünde…

Eski kumpasları hatırlatırcasına şunu diyorlardı: ‘MİT TIR’ları MİT gemileri oldu.’ FETÖ bütün yayın organlarında Türkiye’den Libya’ya giden ticaret gemilerini, harp gemilerini hep hedef gösterdi. Bunun arkasında hem Türkiye’ye yaptırım uygulatmak, aynı zamanda Türkiye’yi yönetenleri savaş mahkemesinde yargılatmak var. Türkiye’ye çok ciddi yaptırımlar ve müdahaleler gelebilirdi. Gerçekten bunlar bir konteynerin içine silah koymuş da olabilirlerdi. 16 saat arama şu demek: muhtemelen kumpas ve iftira ustası FETÖ’cüler bunları çok ciddi inandırmış. Rastgele bir arama değil. Yoksa 1-2 saatte çıkılırdı. Didik didik aramışlar.”

Yapılması gerekenler

“Bu saatten sonra atılması gereken adımlar şunlardır:

1) Birleşmiş Milletler nezdinde şikayetçi olmak gerekir. Mavi Marmara olayında ilgililer nasıl dava edildiyse şimdi de dava edilmesi,

2) Yunanistan, İtalya ve Almanya’dan davacı olunması.

3) Emri veren subaylar ve uygulayan askerler hakkında ismen uluslararası ceza mahkemelerinde davacı olunması,

4) Misilleme hakkı uluslararası hukukta meşru bir haktır. Aynıyla mukabele edilmesinde büyük fayda vardır. Boğazlardan geçen bir Yunan gemisi aynı şekilde durdurulur ve aynı faaliyetler uygulanabilir.Bu noktada Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’ni yönetenler çok boyutlu düşünmelidirler. Almanya ile bizim çok ciddi bir ticaret ilişkimiz var. İhracatımızın en büyük ortağı. Çok sıkı bir ilişkimiz var. O zaman bunları karşılıklı zarar verecek şekilde değil, bir daha olmayacak şekilde alınacak tedbirlerin düşünülmesi gerekir. Türkiye’nin hedefi şaşırmaması gerekir. Askeri ve adli tedbirler alınırken ekonomik ve siyasi menfaatlerimiz açısından da düşünmemiz lazım. Ama Harekat Komutanı Yunanlıdır ve emri veren de odur. Dolayısıyla Yunanistan affedilmemelidir.”

KAYNAK: AYDINLIK

17.

NATO Deputy Secretary General: our societies have to be tech ready, and our tech sector security ready

  • 25 Nov. 2020 

Speaking at the NATO-Private Sector Dialogue hosted by GLOBSEC on Wednesday (25 November), NATO Deputy Secretary General Mircea Geoană said that NATO has to continue to compete in the battle space where conflicts are defined as much by bytes and big data as by bullets and battleships.

Keynote speech by NATO Deputy Secretary General Mircea Geoană at a NATO and GLOBSEC event called NATO 2030: NATO-Private Sector Dialogue focusing on The Future of Warfare and the Role of New and Emerging Technologies

He noted that NATO is facing a technological race to implement and adopt new technologies. This also means having the right people, money and structures in place.

The Coronavirus is often referred to as a black swan event. High impact, but highly improbable. Whereas emerging technology is more like a grey rhino. High impact and highly likely. We all see it coming. Ignoring it – it will be at our own peril,” Deputy Secretary General said.  Mr. Geoană stressed that NATO, challenged by countries who do not share its values or play by the same rules, is ready and continues to adapt.

Our open democracies, educational models – they all bring levels of creativity and disruption that other forms of government cannot. Large companies compete with start-ups to generate fresh thinking. This drives innovation, encourages healthy competition, and builds societal resilience,” he noted.

The Deputy Secretary General reminded that NATO leaders endorsed a roadmap on emerging and disruptive technologies last December. NATO also has a well-working network of over 6,000 scientists and engineers dedicated to integrating the most advanced technologies into NATO and Allied platforms.

The NATO 2030 Private Sector Dialogues with GLOBSEC seek to deepen the involvement of the private sector across the transatlantic sphere and in advancing NATO’s agenda, in the NATO 2030 spirit of widening public discussion of NATO’s current and future roles and future evolution.

 “ΕΛΛΗΝΑΣ

-/-