Μεσημβρινό… “Απεριτίφ”!

Φίλοι μου / μας!

1. ΖΟΥΜΕ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙ ΤΟΝ 21ο ΑΙ. ; ΔΙΑΒΑΣΤΕ ΤΟ ΠΑΡΑΚΑΤΩ ΚΕΙΜΕΝΟ!..

Israeli envoy slams UN for discriminating between murder of ‘Israeli citizens’ and ‘settlers’

This kind of distinction between purported different types of civilian casualties is in absolute violation of international law norms,” Gilad Erdan wrote. 

By Aryeh Savir/TPS

Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations Gilad Erdan sent a scathing letter to the UN Secretary-General António Guterres following statistics published by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in which it differentiates between the murder of “Israeli Citizens” and “Settlers.”

The OCHA report listed the number of Israeli and Arab casualties, either killed or wounded in hostilities, from 2008.

The letter, sent Friday, was authored following the discovery that the agency’s website separates Israeli casualties into three categories – security personnel, civilians, and “civilian settlers.”

Additionally, following the murder of Eli Kay in a terror attack in Jerusalem committed by a Hamas-linked terrorist about two weeks ago, Kay was added to the list of “settler” casualties despite being a resident of Modi’in, an Israeli city that is not a “settlement.”

As a result, Erdan sent a harsh and detailed letter to Guterres, demanding that the issue be corrected immediately and that the website’s publications be amended.

In his letter, Erdan wrote that “unbelievably, and in stark opposition to customary humanitarian law norms, the OCHA website makes a distinction not only between Israeli victims belonging to Israeli security forces (i.e. combatants) and Israeli civilians — as might be expected in line with the legal principle of distinction under IHL [International humanitarian law] — but makes a further distinction between so-called “Israeli settlers” and “other Israeli civilians” when citing Israeli civilian casualties.”

“This kind of distinction between purported different types of civilian casualties is in absolute violation of international law norms. As I am sure you are aware, international law does, indeed, distinguish between ‘combatants’ (i.e. participants in hostilities) and ‘civilians’ under the laws of armed conflict. However, there is absolutely NO distinction made under international law between types of citizens, be it based on their zip code or their ideological beliefs,” he underscored.

“Moreover, not only does the OCHA website get international law wrong. It gets the facts wrong as well. Indeed, the latest Israeli civilian casualty – 26-year-old Eli Kay of blessed memory – is erroneously listed as a so-called “settler” on the OCHA, when actually the late Kay lived in the central Israeli town of Modiin. This glaring error – especially when the hometown of Eli Kay was readily available on numerous, reliable open media sources – calls into question the accuracy of all the casualty statistics on the OCHA website, be they Israeli or Palestinian,” Erdan wrote.

He further charged that the UN and OCHA’s distinction between types of Israeli casualties “calls into question not only the organization’s commitment to the accepted principles of international law, but whether the UN and its various bodies view the cold-blooded murder of certain types of Israeli civilians as somehow justified or even warranted.”

“The Government of Israel cannot accept the cheapening or devaluation of Jewish lives. Indeed, all Jewish and Israeli lives matter, and we can expect no less than this to be reflected in all of the UN official statements and publications. I, therefore, call upon you to take action to right the egregious wrong immediately,” he demanded.

Israel has previously complained about the OCHA’s presentation of data and depiction of events.

“It is time to put an end to this disgrace and make it clear to the UN leaders – stick to the truth and the facts,” Erdan wrote in January 2021 after the OCHA wrote that Israeli terror victim Esther Horgan “was found dead”.

2.

Palestinians ‘Welcome’ US Pressure on Israel

 

3.

Iran helping Syria develop nuclear reactor – report

By World Israel News Staff

Iran is helping finance and construct a nuclear reactor in Syria, Saudi daily Okaz reported a former Syrian parliamentarian as saying.

Mohammad Barmo, who is now a political dissident fighting to unseat Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, has made the explosive accusation in the past.

Israel is widely believed to have bombed Syria’s fledgling Al-Kibar nuclear development site in the eastern Deir Ezzor district in 2007.

But according to numerous political enemies of al-Assad, the bombing didn’t completely put a damper on Syria’s plans to develop its nuclear program.

Despite refusing to publicly admit that the country has nuclear ambitions, Syria has consistently tried to advance its nuclear development program, say various international agencies.

Watchdog group the Nuclear Threat Initiative reports that Syria has “sought nuclear technical assistance from countries including China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea” in the past.

The NTI notes that the International Atomic Energy Agency “concluded that the Al-Kibar facility, destroyed by Israel in 2007, was ‘very likely a nuclear reactor’ and should have been declared to the IAEA.”

Because of the chaos caused by the now-decade long Syrian civil war, international watchdog groups and nuclear inspectors have not had the opportunity to conduct investigations into possible nuclear sites within the country.

During this time, it’s possible that Syria could be discreetly moving to advance its nuclear program with less risk of international scrutiny.

German newspaper Spiegel Online reported in 2015 that Syria’s nuclear program was continuing in a secret underground facility near the southern border with Lebanon.

However, no corroborating evidence could be found to support the report, aside from statements from anonymous sources.

In May 2021, Russia announced that it deployed three nuclear-capable long-range bombers to its operational bases in Syria.

4.

How Obama Sabotaged the American Military

Obama fundamentally transformed the military the way that he did the country.

 

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center specializing in investigative reporting on the Left and Islamic terrorism.

Editors’ note: This article on the subversion of the American military is one of a series Daniel Greenfield has written on what is probably the greatest and most immediate threat to America’s security and survival. It’s a subject surrounded by silence. See the Freedom Center’s articles on this issue at its new campaign site, Committee for a Patriotic Military. Also make sure to read Daniel Greenfield’s booklet, Disloyal: How the Military Brass is Betraying Our Country.

By the time Barack Obama left office, every branch of the military was smaller than it had been on September 11. But the change in size concealed the true impact of America’s most left-wing president in undermining our national security and weakening us in the face of our enemies.

 “I’ve got a pen, and I’ve got a phone,” Obama famously boasted. He used the pen to unleash a blizzard of executive orders and memorandums. Some led to outraged protests, but some of his most devastating penned assaults on our nation’s military flew under the radar.

One of those took place during the end of his last year in office. His memorandum, “Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in the National Security Workforce”, created the woke military of the Biden administration by putting identity politics, diversity quotas, and political indoctrination at the heart of the military’s mission.

Obama had always resented the military. Even former General McChrystal, an Obama loyalist fired for describing his boss a little too aptly in the presence of a Rolling Stone reporter, described him as “uncomfortable and intimidated” by generals. But Obama’s parting shot at the military cut the generals down to size by transforming them into community organizers.

His order redefined diversity as the military’s “greatest asset” and reinvented national security as a system for maximizing employment diversity by race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and every identity politics metric, but not the military metrics that truly mattered, readiness, competence, and a willingness to wage war in defense of the homeland.

Along with transforming the military into another quota-based federal employment agency in which skills and capability mattered much less than being a disabled transgender Eskimo, the order also demanded that national security agencies should make “implicit or unconscious bias” training mandatory for “senior leadership and management positions”. Divisions that didn’t earn sufficiently high IQ (Inclusion Quotient) scores would also be hit with bias training.

Implicit bias training is a form of political indoctrination which asserts that all white people are racist. Its sessions force participants into accepting its radical racial worldview or be treated as obstacles to the new organizational mission. Implicit bias training has succeeded in forcing out talented executives from corporations and officers from the military, replacing them with political activists and bootlickers cowardly enough to repeat Marxist dogma for the sake of their careers.

Obama’s memorandum led to the expansion of implicit bias within the military such as Army Secretary Eric Fanning’s infamous Directive 2017-06 ordering mandatory implicit bias training for “soldiers and employees in senior leadership and management positions” that was protested by chaplains for infringing on religious freedom. While the Trump administration later ordered a ban on such abusive training in the military, by then Obama’s order had long since been circulating in its cultural and organizational bloodstream, and was quickly restarted by Biden.

Biden’s first executive orders not only rescinded the ban, but doubled down on making the military more woke, more racist towards white Americans, and more incapable than ever. The new equity push went even further by attributing any failure to meet racial, gender, and other identity politics quotas to the grand hoax of “systemic racism” –a practice outlawed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Meeting these quotas became the foremost task of senior leadership.

China might beat us in the hypersonic weapons race, but America’s top military brass would pull out all the stops to make sure that they had the most diverse arrangement of people, preferably in senior leadership positions, to establish their progressive credentials.

The ‘wokening’ of the military was not a bottom-up, but a top-down phenomenon, imposed at every step from branch leaders to academy superintendents, after originating from the White House. Obama’s “Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in the National Security Workforce” was one of the final building blocks for his key administration goal of bringing the most conservative arm of the federal government into compliance with the political agendas of the radical Left.

Obama’s former NASA administrator, Charles Bolden, had caused a stir when he frankly told Al Jazeera that his boss had given him three top priorities, none of which involved space, but one of which was Muslim self-esteem. No military leader had come out with an equally honest assessment, but Obama’s priorities for the military was looting its physical resources for environmental gimmicks like the Navy’s disastrous biofuels programs, and its human resources for a massive community organizing and Marxist indoctrination effort under the flag of diversity.

Obama didn’t just leave the military smaller in size, but smaller in spirit, its leadership class no longer dedicated to national security, but to the identity political agendas of the radical Left.

By Obama’s second term, male Army ROTC cadets were being forced to march in women’s high heels. The humiliating woke rituals, whose purpose is not the stated one of inclusion, but of exclusion, of demeaning and destroying the morale of the traditional fighting man, continue to hollow out the military readiness of armed services waging a culture war against themselves.

Obama remade the military just as he remade the nation, from a team based on individual worth into a broken system divided by the intractable gulfs of oppressors and the oppressed.

No military organization can function that way and no nation can survive that way.

Obama understood the nature of big government all too well. It’s a lot easier to program a bad leftist idea into the system than to get it out again. Bill Clinton had tried to tame the military through incremental changes, but Obama went for broke by transforming its mission.

By making diversity the mission, politics in the form of diversity and inclusion also became the mission. The new military mandate was to recruit diversity and to purge its opposite, the traditional white males who made up the backbone not only of the leadership, but of active duty combat personnel. Once an apolitical institution on matters beyond its purview, the military adopted leftist politics as its guiding light. The new advisers pushing diversity and inclusion warned the brass that the military could not become truly inclusive unless it adopted identity politics and all the Marxist ideas and anti-American attitudes that came with it.

That’s why Ibram X. Kendi, a disgraceful racist, showed up on reading lists and why Naval officers denounce America as if they were being held captive by the Viet Cong.

The road to our disgrace in Afghanistan was paved by the Obama administration which embraced a policy of military defeatism on the battlefield and in its institutions. Long before the Taliban entered Kabul, the moral struggle had already been lost in Washington D.C.. While the Taliban were carving up Afghanistan, the nation’s military leaders were busy implementing diversity quotas, imposing implicit bias training, and promoting critical race theory.

The brass who had accepted Obama’s diversity mandate began destroying the military in order to save the military. And they kept it up under the Trump administration even when Obama was gone. Any officer who protested was punished, smeared, and forced out. It will take more than a change of administrations to break that vicious cycle. It will take a change of leadership.

Obama fundamentally transformed the military as he did the nation. It must be fundamentally reformed by removing the brass who traded victory for diversity and anti-Trump lunacy. Gen. Mark Milley, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who had ranted to aides that President Trump was spreading the “gospel of the Fuhrer”, and defended critical race theory, is proof.

Milley and other failed military and political leaders who have undermined our national defense must go so that the military can return to the fundamentals of national defense.

Otherwise the defeat in Afghanistan may become the first of even worse defeats to come.

5.

Christianity: The #1 Target of Hate Crimes

And guess who the primary hater is?

 

Hate crimes against Christianity and its followers in Europe — formerly and for centuries the guardian and disseminator of Christ’s teachings — are at an all-time high.  According to a recent report, at least a quarter of all hate crimes registered in Europe in 2020 were anti-Christian in nature — representing a 70-percent increase in comparison to 2019.  Christianity is, furthermore, the religion most targeted in hate crimes, with Judaism at a close second.

Worse, the true number of hate crimes against Christians is likely even higher.  As the Nov. 16, 2021 report by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) explains (boldface in original):

24 states report data on hate crimes committed due to racism or xenophobia, 20 on LGBT groups, 16 states on anti-Semitism, and 14 on incidents against Muslims, but only 11 countries report data on hate crimes against Christians, and this obviously distorts the statistics significantly. Furthermore, of the 136 civil society organisations that provided descriptive data, only 8 organisations (!) consistently reported incidents against Christians. Both of these findings put the reality of the situation into a different perspective, which indicates that the actual number of hate crimes against Christians is probably way higher.  When comparing the numbers of incidents from last year to the number of this year, we can see an increase of almost 70%. What is also striking, is the fact that of the 4,008 descriptive cases [of 2020], 980 are hate crimes against Christians, almost 25%, more than against any other religious group.

Indeed, whereas 980 hate crimes were anti-Christian in nature, 850 were anti-Semitic and only 254 anti-Islamic.  But as the report explained, the true numbers are probably significantly higher — for whereas the majority of racial, anti-Islamic, or anti-homosexual attacks are reported as such, a great number of anti-Christian attacks are not.  Even so and despite this discrepancy, attacks on Christians are still greater than against any other religious group.

Discussing these findings, Madeleine Enzlberger, head of Intolerance and Discrimination against Christians in Europe, said, “The media and politicians do not see the rise in hatred of Christians in Europe as a growing social problem.  The OSCE report shows only part of this problem, yet it sends a very clear signal against indifference and the almost fashionable bashing of Christians.”

After offering the OSCE’s formal definition of “hate crimes” —  “An offense against a particular group or a prejudice against a particular group that serves as a motive to commit certain crimes against this group” — Danish journalist Sonja Dahlmans elaborates,

This can be the destruction of Christian buildings such as churches or schools, but also Christian symbols such as a crucifix or a statue of Mary. It may also involve violent crimes against Christians, such as the attack on Orthodox priest Nikolas Kakavelakis in the French city of Lyon and the murder of Sir David Amess, a conservative Roman Catholic member of the British Parliament. Amess was murdered [by a Muslim youth] in a church during public conversations with his supporters. … The conclusion is that there are more and more anti-Christian hate crimes in Europe, but that the full state of affairs is unknown because not everything is reported to the competent authorities.

The growing number of hate crimes against Christians in Europe is consistent with other reports.  Open Doors’ World Watch List, which annually ranks the 50 nations that most persecute Christians for their faith, has been consistently recording ever-growing numbers around the world.  According to its 2021 statistics, “more than 340 million” Christians “experience high levels of persecution and discrimination for their faith.”  This represents a 31% increase from 2020 when only “260 million Christians experience[ed] high levels of persecution.”  That represented a 6% increase from 2019 when the number was only 245 million Christians.  And that represented a 14% increase from 2018 when 215 million was the number.  In other words, between just 2018 and 2021, the persecution of Christians has shot up by nearly 60% around the world.

Who is responsible for this dramatic spike in anti-Christian sentiment?  Although many groups affiliated with the so-called “left” are increasingly behind these hate crimes — from Antifa and BLM to neo-pagans — the lions’ share still goes to Islam.  For every consecutive year, as many as 40 of the 50 worst nations ranked by the World Watch annual reports have been Islamic.

While European nations rarely if ever make the top 50, it only follows that the more Europe’s Muslim population grows, the more phenomena intrinsic to the Islamic world — from attacks on churches and crosses to the rape and forced conversion of Christian women — will grow with it, based on Islam’s Rule of Numbers.

Nor is this assertion merely deductive or conjectural.  European regions with large Muslim migrant populations often see a concomitant rise in attacks on churches and Christian symbols.  Consider Germany, where, according to the recent OSCE report, anti-Christian hate crimes have more than doubled since 2019; it too just so happens to have one of the largest Muslim populations of Western Europe — one that has exponentially grown in recent years.

Thus, according to a late 2017 German-language report, in the Alps and in Bavaria alone, some 200 churches were attacked and many crosses broken: “Police are currently dealing with church desecrations again and again,” the report relayed, before honestly adding, “The perpetrators are often youthful rioters with a migration background.”  Before Christmas, 2016, in the North Rhine-Westphalia region, where more than a million Muslim migrants reside, some 50 public statues of Jesus and other Christian figures were beheaded and crucifixes broken.  In 2015, following the arrival of another million Muslim migrants to Dülmen, a local newspaper said “not a day goes by” without attacks on Christian statues.

France, another Western nation that holds a significantly large Muslim population — and where two churches are reportedly attacked every single day, some with human feces — is also indicative that where Muslim numbers grow, so do attacks on Christianity, especially cowardly, anonymous ones on churches.  A January 2017 study revealed that “Islamist extremist attacks on Christians” in France rose by 38 percent, going from 273 attacks in 2015 to 376 in 2016; the majority occurred during the Christmas season, and “many of the attacks took place in churches and other places of worship.”  (For more on the plight of churches in increasingly Islamizing Europe, see here.)

Of course, just as most hate crimes against Christians are not recorded as such, so too are the identities of those most committing these crimes often left out.  Moreover, in a climate where the media do everything possible to conceal the identities of Muslim criminals caught red-handed, surely there will not be a peep to suggest that Muslims might be responsible when the evidence is not concrete.

After all, the “news” is all about maintaining the narrative, one that paints Christians as aggressors and anyone and everyone else as victims — Muslims chief among them.

6.

Abdulhamit Han ve Erdoğan çizgisi!

10.12.2021

Abdulhamit Handan sonra bu vatana ve millete en fazla hizmeti dokunan iktidarın başkan Erdoğan dönemi olduğunu, bu yüzden de Türkiye’nin bütün iç ve dış şer güçlerin hedefi haline geldiğini, onu yıpratmak ve yıkmak için emperyalist güçlerin çeşitli yollardan Erdoğan ve Türkiye’ye sürekli saldırdığını görüyoruz.  

ABD ve AB’ ın eteğinin altına sığınarak muhalefet adına içeriden vatanımızı, milletimizi ve geleceğimizi hedef alan bu saldırılar dün oluğu gibi aynı şekilde Abdulhamit Han’ı devirmek için aynı usul, aynı düşmanlık, aynı kara propaganda, oyun ve taktiklerle bir asır önce meydana geldiği gibi milletin gözü önünde bu ülkede gerçekleşiyor. Millet olarak geçmişten ciddi dersler almadığımız için tarih bugün de aynen tekrar ediyor.

“Tayyip gitmeden bu ülke düzelmez’’ diyen Abdulhamit Han karşıtlarının babaları ve ataları dün de; Abdulhamit gitmeden bu ülke düzelmez’’ diyorlardı. Dindarı dinsizi, şeyhi-şeyhulislamı, yazarı politikacısı, alimi zalimi, Ermeni’si Rum’u, Yahudi’si Hıristiyan’ ı, Mason’ u Sabetayist’ i, muhafazakar ve milliyetçi görünümündeki ittihatçıların millet adına kurdukları zillet ittifakıyla birlikte hareket ederek koskoca İmparatorluğunu 11 yılda parçalayıp yıktılar. İşgaller, katliamlar, göçler, açlık ve yoksulluklarla imtihanın her türlüsünü yaşadık. Bu onurlu millet bir avuç Anadolu toprağına sıkışıp kaldı. Kendi yurtlarımızda yabancı ve esir olduk.

Dışarıdan Türkiye düşmanları ve onların yandaşları içeriden; CHP, PKK, HDP, İP, SP ve diğer bileşenlerin ittifakıyla ülkemiz kuşatılarak, elleri ve kolları bağlanıp esir alınmak isteniyor. Bütün ayak oyunları, göz boyama denemeleri, yalan ve iftira senaryoları, mahvolduk bittik edebiyatları her şey apaçık ortada. Kenar mahalle çocuklarının bile tenezzül etmediği;  yalan, iftira, kara propaganda ve (batı patentli) suni bunalım senaryolarıyla bir kaşık suda fırtınalar koparılarak Türkiye gemisi karaya oturtulmak isteniyor. Bu iş için millet adına, millete karşı yola çıktığını söyleyen Osmanlının kılıç artığı ittihatçılar milletin düşmanlarıyla ittifak ederek; ‘’Tayyip gitsin de, kim gelirse gelsin’’ diye yapmadıkları seviyesizlik, ahlaksızlık ve düşmanlık yok. Cennet mekan Abdulhamid Han’a ve Osmanlıya uygulanan düşmanlığın aynısı bugün de; Erdoğan’a ve Türkiye’ye karşı yerli münafıklar ve dış güçler tarafından uygulanıyor.

Abdulhamit Han’ı darbe ile alaşağı eden Selanik’ten yola çıkan Osmanlı Hareket Ordusuydu. Yani, İttihatçıların komutasındaki o şanlı Osmanlı ordusu… Yani, bizim insanımız ve kardeşlerimiz. Bugün millet ittifakı şemsiyesi altında kandırılmaya, oyuna getirilmeye çalışılan da aynen dünkü kardeşlerimiz gibi bir intihar hareketinin figüranları ve canlı bombaları yapılmaya çalışılıyor. Biden’ in dediği gibi; ‘’Bu sefer darbe ile değil de, muhalefeti destekleyerek’’ Tayyip Erdoğan’ı yıkmaya çalışıyorlar.

Ne acıdır ki, koskoca Osmanlı Sultanı Abdulhamit Hanı İstanbul’da tutuklayan ve ellerini kollarını bağlayıp Selanik’ e göz hapsine götürenlerden birisi Yahudi, diğeri Hıristiyan ve ötekisi ise, Ermeni, diğeri masondur. Tam 33 yıl Osmanlıdan bir avuç toprak kaptırmayan, devleti ve milletini canı gibi koruyan ve yöneten o dev adam 5 zibidi şerefsiz cücenin eliyle (*) esir edildi. Sonra onunla ve ailesi ile kedi ve fare gibi oynadılar. Onurunu ve şerefini ayakları altına alıp çiğnediler. Ve nihayet o ittihatçı ahmaklar 600 yıllık ulu bir imparatorluğu 11 yılda parçalattırıp, yıkıp İngiliz’e teslim ettiler.

Dün, Abdulhamit Han’a yapılan düşmanlık ve ihanetler bugün de; aynen Başkan Erdoğan’a ve onun yönettiği Türkiye’ye yani benim- senin vatanına yapılıyor. Kimler tarafından? Elbette; dünkü ittihatçı alçakların izini süren, düşmanlarımıza özenen ve aşık olanlar tarafından… Müslüman, muhafazakar ve milliyetçi görünen yerli münafıklar, Türkiye’yi Suriyeleştirmek isteyen batınilerin günümüzdeki temsilcileri ve taklitçileri tarafından…

Erdoğan’ı anlamak için onun her gün içinde yaşadığı durumu anlamak ve görmek aklı, vicdanı ve imanı olan bir insan için ders olarak yeter. Erdoğan’ın kim ve nasıl bir adam olduğunu anlamak için, Türkiye’yi çepeçevre saran düşmanlara ve onların ittifak ettikleri yerli münafıklara bakın ve kim kimin dostudur daha iyi göreceksiniz.

İmamı Şafi diyor ki; ‘’ Düşmanlarınız oklarını kime doğru çevrilmişse, o sizin dostunuzdur.’’ Ey Millet! Ey millet ittifakı yaptığını sananlar! Sizin oklarınız ne tarafa çevrilmiş? Türkiye düşmanlarına doğru mu, yoksa ; Türkiye’nin Cumhurbaşkanı ve dostlarına doğru mu? Allah’ın ve peygamberin dostları tarafına mı, şeytanın ve Tağut’ un dostları tarafına mı?

Tayyip Erdoğan ve Türkiye karşısında düşmandan daha düşman davranan ve hareket eden devlet dairesi basan şehir eşkiyaları, yıllarca düşmanlarımıza askerlik yapan ve askerimize kurşun sıkan mağara çakalları, milletimize karşı üç maymunu oynayan politika bezirganları sizin oklarınız neden Erdoğan’ı nişan almış durumda da Amerika’yı, Esed’ i, İsrail’ i, PKK’ yı ve HDP’ yi değil.

Erdoğan gitsin de kim gelirse gelsin moduna girenler!

Söyleyin siz! Hangi Nemrut dağının rüzgarı, hangi Firavun piramidin mumyaları, hangi emperyalizmin kuklaları,  hangi cehenneme odun taşıyan hamallarsınız?

Bu muhalefetin içinizde dört tane koyunu güdecek bir çoban var mı? Din; düşmanı, vatan; düşmanı, millet; düşmanı, ırz ve namus; düşmanı, şehit ve şehit ailesi; düşmanı, cami ve cemaat, İslam ve Kur’an düşmanı çapulcularla Müslüman bir millet ve Türkiye yönetilir mi?

Bırakın, düş kurup iktidara gelmeyi de derin uykularınızdan uyanın! İhanet, namludan çıkan kurşun gibidir. Daha sonra özür ve af dilemek ve geri dönüşü olmaz. Bu millete ve ülkeye kaybettirir ve kaybedersiniz.

Arif Altunbaş, Haber 7

NOT; Meclis-i Mebusan’ın aldığı karar ile Yahudi Emanuel Karasu, Ermeni Aram Efendi, Arnavut Esad Toptani, Gürcü Arif Hikmet Paşa ittihat ve terakki milletvekili baş mabeyinci Cevdet Beydan oluşan 5 mason Abdul Hamit Han’ı tahttan indirdi. Ve Selanik’e sürgün etti.

Abdulhamit Hanın tahtan indirilmesinden hemen sonra Osmanlıda ilk defa ‘’Büyük Osmanlı Mason locası’’ kuruldu. Başına İttihat ve Terakkinin önde giden ismi meşhur mason Talat Paşa getirildi.

7. ΓΙΑΤΙ ΕΜΦΑΝΙΖΕΣΑΙ ΜΟΛΙΣ ΧΑΝΕΙ Ο ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΣ, ΡΕ ΚΑΡΑΓΚΙΟΖΑΚΟ; OK! ΧΘΕΣ, ΣΤΗΝ ΑΜΒΕΡΣΑ, ΗΜΑΣΤΑΝ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙ ΓΙΑ ΚΛΩΤΣΙΕΣ! ΠΕΣ ΜΟΥ ΟΜΩΣ, ΑΦΟΥ ΕΙΣΑΙ ΤΟΣΟ ΚΑΛΟΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΚΡΙΣΗ ΣΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΚΥΡΙΩΣ ΤΟΣΟ… ΕΝΤΙΜΟΣ, ΕΓΙΝΕ Η(ΔΙΑΖ) ΟΧΙ ΠΕΝΑΛΤΥ ΣΤΟΝ ΤΙΚΙΝΙΟ ΣΟΑΡΕΣ (“ΥΑΙΝΑ”) ΣΤΟ Α’ ΗΜ. ;

Ο ΙΤΑΛΟΣ ΔΙΑΙΤΗΤΗΣ MAΡKO ΝΤΙ ΜΠΕΛΟ ΛΕΓΕΤΑΙ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΚΑ ΜΑΡΚΟ ΝΤΙ… “ΚΟΛΠΟ”! ΟΤΑΝ ΕΙΔΑ ΤΗΝ ΦΑΣΗ ΠΟΥ Ο ΑΓΚΙΜΠΟΥ ΕΚΛΕΨΕ ΤΗΝ ΜΠΑΛΑ ΚΑΙ ΕΔΩΣΕ ΣΕ ΒΑΡΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΕΠΙΘΕΤΙΚΟ ΦΑΟΥΛ, “ΕΔΕΣΑ” ΜΕΣΑ ΜΟΥ ΟΤΙ ΟΣΟ ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΠΑΙΖΑΜΕ, ΔΕΝ ΥΠΗΡΧΕ ΠΕΡΙΠΤΩΣΗ Ο “ΜΙΛΗΜΕΝΟΣ” ΙΤΑΛΟΣ, ΠΟΥ ΛΟΓΩ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΚΙΣΤΗΣ ΑΠΟΔΟΣΕΩΣ ΜΑΣ ΔΕΝ ΧΡΕΙΑΣΤΗΚΕ ΝΑ… ΕΠΕΜΒΕΙ, (ΠΛΗΝ ΦΥΣΤΙΚΑ ΤΗΣ ΦΑΣΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΕΝΑΛΤΥ), ΝΑ ΜΑΣ ΑΦΗΝΕ ΟΥΤΕ ΚΑΝ ΝΑ ΙΣΟΦΑΡΙΖΑΜΕ!.. ΜΕΤΑ ΑΠ’ ΑΥΤΟ ΤΟ ΠΑΙΧΝΙΔΙ ΙΣΩΣ ΝΑ ΤΟΝ ΑΝΕΒΑΣΕΙ Η ΟΥΕΦΑ (ΘΕΟΔΩΡΙΔΗΣ) ΣΤΗΝ Α’ ΚΑΤΗΓΟΡΙΑ ΔΙΑΙΤΗΤΩΝ!

ΚΑΙ ΦΕΤΟΣ ΒΑΖΕΛΑΚΟ, ΟΥΤΕ ΕΝΑΣ “ΠΟΥ… “ΔΙΑΙΤΗΤΗΣ ΔΕΝ ΜΑΣ ΕΠΑΙΞΕ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΗ 50% – 5Ο%! ΕΜΕΙΣ ΟΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ, ΒΑΖΕΛΑΚΟ, ΕΧΟΥΜΕ ΣΤΗΝ ΟΥΕΦΑ ΤΟΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΑ -ΥΠΟΤΙΘΕΤΑΙ- ΘΕΟΔΩΡΙΔΗ ΚΑΙ ΜΑΛΙΣΤΑ ΩΣ ΑΝΤΙ-ΠΡΟΕΔΡΟ, ΚΛΠ, ΚΑΙ ΜΕ ΛΑΜΠΡΟ… ΜΕΛΛΟΝ, ΑΧΑΧΑΧΑΧΑ, ΚΑΙ ΣΦΑΓΙΑΖΟΜΑΣΤΕ, ΔΙΟΤΙ ΕΙΜΑΣΤΕ ΟΙ ΓΝΩΣΤΟΙ ΔΙΧΑΣΜΕΝΟΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΠΑΝΤΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΣΕ ΟΛΑ, ΕΝΩ ΟΙ ΤΟΥΡΚΟΙ, ΣΕ ΑΝΤΙΔΙΑΣΤΟΛΗ, ΕΙΧΑΝ ΠΧ ΤΟΝ ΤΣΑΚΙΡ ΓΙΑ “Χ” ΧΡΟΝΙΑ, ΩΣ ΔΙΑΙΤΗΤΗ ΓΙΑ ΟΛΕΣ ΤΙΣ ΔΟΥΛΕΙΕΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΟΥΕΦΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΝ ΕΒΑΖΑΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΠΑΙΖΕ ΠΑΝΤΑ ΓΙΟΥΒΕ ΚΑΙ ΡΕΑΛ, ΩΣΤΕ ΝΑ ΠΕΡΝΑΝΕ ΑΥΤΕΣ ΟΙ ΟΜΑΔΕΣ “ΑΕΡΑ” ΣΤΑ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΑ ΚΥΠΕΛΛΑ, ΚΛΠ, ΜΕ ΤΙΣ Τ/ΟΜΑΔΕΣ ΝΑ ΠΑΙΡΝΟΥΝ ΠΟΛΛΑ ΑΝΤΙΔΩΡΑ, ΑΝ ΜΕ ΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΑΙΝΕΙΣ!..

ΤΗΝ ΙΔΙΑ ΣΤΙΓΜΗ ΕΜΕΙΣ ΜΕ ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΟ ΑΝΤΙΠΡΟΕΔΡΟ ΣΤΗΝ ΟΥΕΦΑ, ΕΣΤΩ ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟΝ ΤΟΝ ΑΗΔΙΑΣΤΙΚΟ ΜΙΣΕΛΛΗΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΦΑΝΑΤΙΚΟ ΑΝΤΙ-ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟ ΘΕΟΔΩΡΙΔΗ, ΔΕΝ ΕΧΟΥΜΕ ΟΥΤΕ ΕΘΝΙΚΗ ΟΜΑΔΑ, ΕΝΩ ΟΙ “ΕΞΥΓΙΑΝΤΕΣ” ΚΑΙ ΦΙΛΟΙ ΤΟΥ ΕΚΑΝΑΝ ΤΟ ΟΑΚΑ ΕΔΡΑ ΜΕΧΡΙ ΚΑΙ ΤΩΝ… ΑΛΒΑΝΟ-ΚΟΣΟΒΑΡΩΝ ΟΙ ΞΕΦΤΙΛΕΣ, ΠΟΥ ΤΟ “ΠΑΙΖΟΥΝ” ΚΑΙ ΠΑΤΡΙΩΤΕΣ!..

ΑΝΑΜΕΝΩ ΛΟΙΠΟΝ ΝΑ ΜΟΥ ΠΕΙΣ! ΗΤΑΝ ΠΕΝΑΛΤΥ Η(ΔΙΑΖ) ΟΧΙ Η ΑΝΑΤΡΟΠΗ ΤΟΥ ΤΙΚΙΝΙΟ ΣΤΟ Α’ ΗΜΙΧΡΟΝΟ ΧΘΕΣ !.. (ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΟ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΑ ΠΙΣΩ ΤΡΑΒΗΓΜΑ ΚΑΙ ΠΕΤΑΓΜΑ ΚΑΤΩ ΤΗΣ… “ΥΑΙΝΑΣ”)!..

ΠΟΥ ΚΑΤΑΝΤΗΣΑΤΕ ΟΜΩΣ ΡΕ ΞΕΦΤΙΛΕΣ! ΝΑ ΠΕΡΙΜΕΝΕΤΕ ΝΑ ΧΑΣΕΙ Ο ΘΡΥΛΟΣ ΜΑΣ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΠΑΝΗΓΥΡΙΣΕΤΕ, ΡΕ ΛΕΣΙΑ!..

ΕΛΛΗΝΑΣ

-/-