Δύσκολες Ώρες!



What our president must do to seal the border.

October 22, 2018


Joseph Klein


A migrant caravan from Central America is currently heading en masse to the United States. Its members, several thousand strong, are intent on pouring into the U.S. in what amounts to an invasion force. President Trump has correctly branded the caravan an “onslaught” and an “assault on our country.” The president has promised to use military troops if necessary to close the southern border with Mexico. He also threatened to cut off all foreign aid to those Central American countries that are not doing enough to stop the migration caravan in its tracks.

Members of the caravan have already demonstrated their violent streak during an early stage of their trek, as they approached Mexico. They “forced their way through Guatemala’s northwestern border and flooded onto a bridge leading to Mexico,” AFP reported. These migrants, mainly from Honduras, engaged in violent clashes with Mexican riot police as they tried to surge through police lines and cross the bridge into Mexico. Four Mexican police officers were reportedly injured. “Violent entry into the country not only threatens our sovereignty, but also puts the migrants themselves at risk,” Mexico’s President Pena Nieto said. “Mexico does not permit and will not permit entry into its territory in an irregular fashion, much less in a violent fashion.”

Mexican government officials have said that Mexico would be willing to consider asylum requests from members of the caravan on an individual basis, with the assistance of the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner on Refugees (“UNHCR”). Mexico is proposing that UNCHR establish shelters along Mexico’s southern border with Central American countries. Individuals deemed by the UN agency to be eligible for asylum protection, presumably after performing its standard vetting, would be eligible for placement in a host country willing to accept them, which could be Mexico or the United States. Those deemed not to have a legitimate claim would be sent back to their home countries. If someone manages to slip through this system and travels through Mexico before crossing the Mexico-U.S. border into the United States, Mexico has indicated that it would be willing to accept the return of that individual if the U.S. so wishes. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that the United States welcomed and would cooperate with Mexico’s initiative to have Central American migrants processed for possible asylum in Mexico first with UN assistance. The initiative conforms with international law on the handling of claims for refugee status and is an orderly and humane solution to the migration crisis that the caravan has precipitated.

However, the migrant invaders are impatient. “We are going to the United States,” said one of the migrants. “Nobody is going to stop us.” The Associated Press has reported that despite Mexico’s attempt to intervene, “a growing throng of Central American migrants resumed their advance toward the U.S. border early Sunday in southern Mexico.” Their numbers have reportedly grown, after migrants in the caravan decided not to submit to Mexico’s asylum process that would have enabled them to enter Mexico legally. Instead, they took the law into their own hands. Mexico now appears to have largely given up and is doing little to stop them.

The caravan migrants believe that they are entitled to simply pass through Mexico without any interference and ensconce themselves in the United States. A press release issued by the organizers of a similar migrant caravan earlier this year stated a “demand of Mexico and the United States” that “they open the borders to us because we are as much citizens as the people of the countries where we are and/or travel.” This “open borders” demand is a direct challenge to U.S. national sovereignty. Migrants are not entitled to insist upon a “right” to choose the United States as their destination country, including would-be asylum-seekers if they are offered the chance for asylum in Mexico first.

Some of the caravan migrants cry poverty and use children as shields while pleading their case. Others in the caravan have likely learned – from the migrants who preceded them and from open borders advocates encouraging their migration – the playbook of how to exploit the loophole-ridden U.S. immigration laws. They know that their sheer numbers will further overwhelm an already overstretched adjudicative process with many more amnesty claims. Once in this country, the migrants, especially those with children in tow, are likely to be released into the community-at-large, pending the outcome of their asylum hearings, which could take place years later. They may well skip their hearings altogether, as many before them have done, and remain free to live in our country at American taxpayers’ expense indefinitely. Other migrants in the caravan who manage to make it to the U.S. border will simply enter illegally at unguarded points without even the pretense of seeking asylum unless they can be stopped first. Terrorists and criminal gang members are free to take part in the caravan with little chance of detection.

President Trump has vowed to use the military to seal the southern border of the United States with Mexico, if necessary – a stretch of territory as long as 2000 miles. Aside from logistical issues, questions have been raised as to whether the president has the legal authority to take such action in enforcing U.S. immigration laws, at least with respect to utilizing active-duty members of the army, navy, air force and marines. Those who claim that the president does not have such authority cite the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, as amended from time to time, which prohibits active duty military troops from executing the country’s laws unless expressly authorized by the Constitution or an Act of Congress. This statute does not apply to the National Guard operating under state authority.

A federal court has held that the Posse Comitatus Act “makes unlawful the use of federal military troops in an active role of direct law enforcement by civil law enforcement officers,”  which includes “arrest; seizure of evidence; search of a person; search of a building; investigation of crime; interviewing witnesses; pursuit of an escaped civilian prisoner; search of an area for a suspect or other like activities.” Military personnel can do little more than maintain border fences and vehicles and perhaps also assist with surveillance, including in connection with drugs smuggling, if the Posse Comitatus Act is interpreted as restrictively as open borders proponents are likely to advocate in court.

However, repelling an organized force of unvetted migrants, who may include terrorists and foreign criminal gang members, from entering this country in the first place is not simply civil domestic law enforcement. It is a military response to a genuine threat to U.S. territorial sovereignty and national security originating from foreign territories. The military response would be directed by the president of the United States who is vested with the constitutional authority of commander in chief.  The president would be using the military to implement the constitutional mandate of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution that the “United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion.”

Moreover, the Posse Comitatus Act was intended to protect Americans within the boundaries of the United States from military rule. Its original purpose was to put an end to the use of federal troops to police state elections in the ex-Confederate states where the civil power had been reestablished. As one federal court stated, the Posse Comitatus Act is “the type of criminal statute which is properly presumed to have no extraterritorial application in the absence of statutory language indicating a contrary intent.” There is nothing in either the legislative history or text of the Posse Comitatus Act.to indicate that its drafters intended to prohibit the president’s use of military troops to block aliens gathered together in a horde from attempting to cross into our country after having violently clashed with the police of another country en route and having willfully evaded that country’s laws. Terrorists may well be concealing themselves in the migrant caravan. Hezbollah, for example, has already managed to penetrate the U.S. border with Mexico, posing a serious national security threat.

The Supreme Court recently upheld the constitutionality of President Trump’s executive order limiting the entry of aliens from certain countries on national security grounds, pending a thorough review of the vetting process. The Court relied on §1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which enables the President to “suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens” whenever he “finds” that their entry “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

Analogously, if the president determines that it is necessary to use active members of the military to enforce federal authority in situations he deems potentially dangerous to national security, there is a statutory exception to the Posse Comitatus Act which should allow him to do just that (10 U.S.C. § 332, renumbered §252). This provision states that the president may “use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary,” to enforce “the laws of the United States” whenever he “considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages” make it “impracticable” to enforce such laws “by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.” The migrant caravan aimed at entering the United States is an “assemblage” by definition. This assemblage has already acted unlawfully in violent clashes with Mexican riot police, after which some members then entered Mexico illegally despite being given the chance to submit to a legal process for asylum claims. U.S. border enforcement officials have already been overwhelmed by the number of illegal aliens and would-be asylum seekers from Central America. The current migration caravan will further burden the adjudicative system for amnesty hearings to the point of implosion.

President Trump tweeted on Sunday: “Full efforts are being made to stop the onslaught of illegal aliens from crossing our Southern Border. People have to apply for asylum in Mexico first, and if they fail to do that, the U.S. will turn them away.” If he needs the military to protect the border from the migrant caravan invasion, so be it.



Report: Kelly, Lewandowski Had Physical Altercation in February

White House chief of staff John Kelly (Evan Vucci/AP)

By Solange Reyner    |   Monday, 22 October 2018

White House chief of staff John Kelly and former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski in February got into a physical altercation outside of the Oval Office and had to be separated by Secret Service agents, The New York Times reports.

Kelly has been in several brush ups with aides since Trump brought him on last July, and last week got into a heated argument with National Security Adviser John Bolton over immigration and border crossings, including the performance of the Homeland Security Department under Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.

Last year, he got into a physical altercation with a Chinese official during Trump’s visit to Beijing and reportedly refused to accept an apology unless a senior Chinese official came to Washington and apologized under a U.S. flag in Washington, per The Wall Street Journal.

The altercation between Kelly and Lewandowski was the ugliest that occurred in the West Wing, per the Times. It happened when families of the victims injured in the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School were walking into the White House for an event with Trump in the East Room.

Kelly had slammed Lewandowski, telling Trump he was profiting off the president in the form of his contract with the super PAC supporting the president’s re-election, and also said the aide had been criticizing him on TV for the way he handled the security clearance controversy related to Rob Porter.

Trump took a call, both men left the room, and Kelly, as he walked toward his office, called on someone to remove Lewandowski from the building. The two argued, and Kelly eventually grabbed Lewandowski by his collar and tried to push him up against the wall.




Bomb found in mailbox of George Soros� New York home

 JTA – An explosive device was found in the mailbox outside of the New York home of Jewish billionaire George Soros.

The device found Monday was detonated by a police bomb squad, The New York Times reported.

The home is located in Katonah, a hamlet in the upscale town of Bedford in northern Westchester County.

A package containing the bomb was opened by an employee in the Soros home, who called police. Soros was not at the home when the bomb was discovered, according to The Times.

The case has been turned over to the FBI. Police said there is no threat to public safety.

Soros has come under intense fire recently from Republicans and the right in the United States. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and President Donald Trump claimed that Soros funded the protesters at the recent demonstrations in Washington, D.C., over the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, and Trump s lawyer Rudy Giuliani retweeted a Twitter user who called Soros the anti-Christ.

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., charged earlier this week, without evidence, that U.S.-bound migrants in a caravan formed last week in Honduras were offered cash by Soros. The Open Society Foundations, Soros philanthropy, has denied any involvement.

Soros, a Hungary-born Holocaust survivor, is a left-leaning donor to the Democrats and other liberal and pro-democracy causes in the United States, Europe and Israel. He often features in right-wing conspiracy theories, especially in his native Hungary, where nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban has pegged him as a symbol of intruding globalist forces.

Soros Jewish critics include those who object to his support for the liberal Middle East policy group J Street and at least two Israeli groups highly critical of the Israeli government, B Tselem and Breaking the Silence. In July 2017, Israel s Foreign Ministry issued a statement denouncing Soros, saying he continuously undermines Israel s democratically elected governments. The statement appeared to backtrack on an earlier statement by Israel s envoy to Hungary denouncing Orban s anti-Soros campaign.

Earlier this month, the Anti-Defamation League posted a report outlining the anti-Semitism behind many of the conspiracy theories surrounding Soros.

Many of those conspiracy theories employ longstanding anti-Semitic myths, particularly the notion that rich and powerful Jews work behind the scenes, plotting to control countries and manipulate global events, according to the report. This is especially true when Soros-related conspiracy theories include other well-worn anti-Semitic tropes such as control of the media or banks; references to undermining societies or destabilizing countries; or language that hearkens back to the medieval blood libels and the characterization of Jews as evil, demonic, or agents of the antichrist.

(Photo – Wiki Commons)



Leftist hate group “Just Communities” has a $250,000 contract with Santa Barbara educators to brainwash students.


Editor’s note: Beginning below, there is a “Forms of Oppression” grid that is part of a bundle of documents produced by the leftist group “Just Communities,” which the unfortunate taxpayers of Santa Barbara, California, are paying Just Communities $250,000 annually to use to indoctrinate their children with anti-American beliefs.

Above is a curriculum the Santa Barbara Unified School District has paid an organization called “Just Communities” to impose on its K-12 students. It tells you all you need to know about the racist, anti-American left which has embedded itself in school districts like Santa Barbara all across the country.

The left-wing hate group, whose full name is Just Communities Central Coast, has a $250,000 contract with school authorities in Santa Barbara, California, to indoctrinate young people into believing that America today is a manifestly immoral, cruel country in which white people routinely oppress non-whites, men oppress women, Christians oppress non-Christians, heterosexuals oppress gays, and the wealthy oppress the poor.

This anti-American mini-manifesto aimed at fomenting social discontent comes in a “Forms of Oppression” grid produced by Just Communities, which is partnering with the Santa Barbara Unified School District (SBUSD). The grid is included in a bundle of documents published online that includes the Just Communities 2018 training manual. (The document is also posted at Scribd here.)

Just Communities is attempting to radicalize students and encourage them to become activists obsessed with the Marxist holy trinity of race, sex, and class.

With help from the extreme-left hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and other radical activists trying to impose unwanted social change on the country, public school teachers across America already saturate students with information about racial injustice in America in a nonstop barrage of historic facts and ahistorical nonsense. And in the culture at large, the media, politicians, and the entertainment industry can’t stop talking about race. The last thing any young student in America needs is to be taught about is race. Race matters only to radicals.

In Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Marxist theorist Paulo Freire urged that schools be used to inculcate radical values in students to transform them into agents of social change. Freire argued that the so-called dominant pedagogy “silences” poor and minority children and that there is no such thing as a neutral educational system. Teachers today are also smitten with the ahistorical, anti-American screeds of Howard Zinn, a Communist Party USA member whose writings they treat as gospel.

Joining Freire in his desire to use the educational system to level institutions is unrepentant communist terrorist and education theorist Bill Ayers, a close associate of Barack Obama who has long advocated corrupting the young so they can agitate to fundamentally transform American society.

“If we want change to come, we would do well not to look at the sites of power we have no access to; the White House, the Congress, the Pentagon,” he said in 2012. “We have absolute access to the community, the school, the neighborhood, the street, the classroom, the workplace, the shop, the farm.”

With its “implicit bias” training in the Santa Barbara Unified School District, Just Communities Central Coast is doing exactly what Ayers urged.

Let’s look at the contents of the Just Communities 2018 training manual.

America, Just Communities maintains, is an irredeemably rotten, racist place, according to the self-serving talking points that abound in the published bundle of documents.

One page from what appears to be a PowerPoint presentation asks:

“(What is) Racism? A system of oppression based on race that privileges white people and targets people of color.”

Another states:

“(white people) Privilege: Unearned access to resources that enhance one’s chances of getting what one needs or influencing others in order to lead a safe, productive, fulfilling life.”

Yet another levels a Marxist attack on America’s market-based system:

“Classism: A system of oppression based on socio-economic class that privilege (white) people who are wealthy and target people (of color) who are poor or working class.Classism also refers to the economic system that creates excessive inequality and causes basic human needs to go unmet.”

Not surprisingly, the group’s 2018 training manual is jam-packed with lies about the nature and history of American society.

At page 12 it states that among its “working assumptions about dismantling oppression” is the idea that “Oppression based on notions of race is pervasive in U.S. society and many other societies and hurts us all, although in different and distinct ways.”

Building on the leftist idea that everything is political, the manual states, “There is no such thing as ‘passively dismantling oppression.’ We are either actively working to end oppression or colluding with it, allowing it to continue. Indeed, we are often doing both at the same time.”

“The work of dismantling racism is an ongoing process, not a one-time event, seminar, or course from which one graduates,” according to the manual. “The process calls for a lifelong commitment to eliminating all injustice.”

Eric Early, a Republican candidate for California Attorney General, told local officials Sept. 11 that the SBUSD’s ongoing agreement with Just Communities to carry out classroom training in what it calls diversity, equity, and inclusion is likely to get the district sued by parents. The district entered into an agreement Sept. 11 to extend the group’s work at a cost of $250,000.

The group’s curriculum, parents say, “is radical, discriminatory, and illegal,” Early said. In a Sept. 21 letter to SBUSD counsel, Early wrote, “Teachers, parents and students have confidentially expressed their concerns that JCCC’s discriminatory curriculum has led to increased racial animosity toward Caucasian teachers and students.”

Jarrod Schwartz, executive director of Just Communities, tried to spin away what his group stands for with a lame conspiracy theory.

“After taking the time to review the materials and the claims, we now feel comfortable stating that many of the materials claimed to be ours have in fact been altered. Things described as being said or taking place during our workshops run counter to our curriculum, approach, and philosophy. At best, our work is being misrepresented; at worst, it is being distorted and doctored to support the claim that we are somehow anti-white and anti-Christian.”

According to its most recent publicly available IRS filing, the Santa Barbara-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit group, created in 2008, had gross revenues of $629,479 and employed eight staffers along with 43 volunteers in 2016.

The far-left Surdna Foundation, which has funded Black Lives Matter, ACORN, and the Van Jones-founded Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, has given Just Communities $329,000 since 2012, according to IRS filings. Other major funders are the Santa Barbara Foundation ($820,697 since 2010), McCune Foundation ($340,588 since 2011), and the James S. Bower Foundation ($240,000 since 2015).

On the About Us page of its website, the group describes its indoctrination work, making no effort to conceal its bad intent:

Just Communities offers cultural competency training to organizational leaders, education seminars for the general public, leadership training institutes for students and teachers, and customized consultation to local agencies for diversity and organizational change initiatives. Just Communities consciously works with people from a diverse cross-section of the community along the lines of race, income, gender, sexual orientation, age, and religious affiliation.

Our expertise in human relations uniquely positions us to serve people and organizations in the education, health care, non-profit, government, and business sectors. The breadth of our vision statement to “ensure that all people are connected, respected, and valued” does not limit our service to a single constituency. Whether we are training health care providers on cultural competency, facilitating a diverse collaboration of service providers to address youth violence, or empowering at-risk teens as leaders in their schools, Just Communities continues to bridge differences among those of diverse backgrounds and cultures to strengthen the local community and advance social justice.

This is all radical-speak for fundamentally transforming the United States of America.

But first Just Communities Central Coast is focusing on poisoning the minds of the young in Santa Barbara.


ΟΦΗ-ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΣ: Ο «άλλος» αγώνας!


ΟΦΗ-ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΣ: Ο «άλλος» αγώνας!
Τρίτη, 23 Οκτωβρίου 2018 

*** Δεν νομίζω ότι ήταν πέναλτι αυτό πού ζητάει ο Ολυμπιακός. Απλά ο Ποτουρίδης σήκωσε το χέρι για να καλέσει ταξί και το βρήκε η μπάλα.

*** «Έβαλε το χεράκι της και η γιαγιά μου για να κερδίσουμε τον Ολυμπιακό», είπε ο ιδιοκτήτης του ΟΦΗ Μπούσης. Να λοιπόν, είδατε ; Όσο ζούμε, όλο και κάτι θα μαθαίνουμε : Τη γιαγιά του Μπούση τη λέγανε Σέζο !

*** Χθες, αποκαλύφθηκε η προτομή της συζύγου του Μιχάλη Μπούση στο … Άργος ! Είναι ο τόπος καταγωγής τους. Η αποκάλυψη της προτομής του διαιτητή Χέζου, θα γίνει αργότερα.

Το πράγμα είναι ξεκάθαρο. Και όποιος δεν μπορεί να διακρίνει τα όρια της ΣΥΝΩΜΟΣΙΑΣ εναντίον του Ολυμπιακού, ας ασχολείται με τη σύνθεση και τις αλλαγές του Μαρτίνς. Εδώ πάντως, δεν θα αφήσουμε το δέντρο να μας κρύβει τη θέα του δάσους. Βασικός στόχος των συριζανελητών είναι ΝΑ ΜΗΝ ΠΑΡΕΙ ΤΙΤΛΟ ο ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΣ. Το να πάρει ο Πάοκ το πρωτάθλημα, είναι δεύτερο στη βαθμίδα προτεραιοτήτων της συγκυβέρνησης. ΟΠΟΙΟΣ ΑΛΛΟΣ εκτός του ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΥ είναι το κυρίαρχο.

Μερικές χρηστικές πληροφορίες για το εξωαγωνιστικό περίβλημα ενός «αγώνα – παραγγελιά» του βρόμικου παρασκηνίου

Δεν πρόκειται βεβαίως σήμερα να ασχοληθώ με την αγωνιστική πλευρά της ήττας από τον ΟΦΗ. Η ήττα αυτή με πίκρανε αφάνταστα, όπως και κάθε οπαδό του Ολυμπιακού, μπολιασμένο από το ίδιο ερυθρόλευκο dna. Πέρα όμως από την αρχική αυθόρμητη αντίδραση, «εναντίον όλων», υπάρχει πάντα και η δεύτερη σκέψη. Η πιο ψύχραιμη. Αλήθεια, και τι θα κερδίσει η ομάδα ; Η αν θέλετε, τι θα κερδίσει ο οπαδός, ο φίλαθλος, ο οπαδός του Ολυμπιακού, από μία περιστασιακή, στείρα “εν πολλοίς” κριτική στους παίκτες ή στον προπονητή; Απολύτως τίποτα, είναι η απάντηση.

Προτιμώ λοιπόν την πολύ πιο δύσκολη, υπεύθυνη, ενδιαφέρουσα ( αλλά και … αρκετά «επικίνδυνη» ενίοτε ) ΕΞΩΑΓΩΝΙΣΤΙΚΗ ανάλυση του ΠΑΡΑΣΚΗΝΙΟΥ. Η αν θέλετε, του … «περιβάλλοντος χώρου» ενός γεγονότος.

Ένα – ένα. Και ξεκινάω με τον ΟΦΗ, την ομάδα – έκπληξη δηλαδή πού παρουσιάστηκε προχθές, εναντίον του Ολυμπιακού. Και κατάφερε να τον κερδίσει.

Δεν είχε σταυρώσει νίκη στους έξι αγώνες του ο ΟΦΗ. Δύο ισοπαλίες και τέσσερις ήττες ήταν η συγκομιδή του σε έξι αγώνες πρωταθλήματος. Με εμφανίσεις από κακές έως κάκιστες. Μέγα φαβορί για υποβιβασμό. Όλα αυτά, μέχρι τις 20 : 30 της Κυριακής. Μέχρι το γκολ του Βουό πού έκρινε και το αποτέλεσμα.

Λένε διάφοροι φίλοι, ότι «καλά έκαναν οι παίκτες του ΟΦΗ πού κέρδισαν». Ότι «μαγκιά τους η νίκη» και «μακάρι να έπαιζε και ο Ολυμπιακός τόσο ψυχωμένα, να κέρδιζε αυτός».

Μάλιστα. Ερωτώ όμως. «Καλά έκαναν και κέρδισαν» τον Ολυμπιακό. Με την Αεκ και τον Πάοκ πού ΔΙΕΣΥΡΘΗΣΑΝ τι έκαναν ; Καλά ή … κακά ; Η μήπως ΕΚΕΙΝΟΣ ο ΞΕΦΤΙΛΙΣΜΕΝΟΣ ΟΦΗ ήταν «άλλη ομάδα», πού παίζει σε … «άλλο πρωτάθλημα», με … «άλλους αντιπάλους» ;

Όποιος θέλει και επιθυμεί να ΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΕΙ ΚΑΛΥΤΕΡΑ το ΤΙ ΣΥΜΒΑΙΝΕΙ στο ελληνικό ποδόσφαιρο, δεν έχει παρά να βάλει να παίξουν τα βίντεο των αγώνων ΟΦΗ – ΠΑΟΚ 1-3 και ΟΦΗ – ΑΕΚ 0-3. Να δει και να θαυμάσει ΓΚΟΛ και ΑΠΟΔΟΣΕΙΣ.

Στον αγώνα ΟΦΗ – ΠΑΟΚ, η ομάδα της Κρήτης παρουσιάστηκε με την ίδια σχεδόν αμυντική διάταξη πού έπαιξε και προχθές κατά του Ολυμπιακού. Δηλαδή, Κυριακίδης, Κοροβέσης, Ποτουρίδης και Νάστος, μαζί με τον Κομεσίδη. Ο Μιχόγεβιτς πού ήταν προχθές βασικός, δεν έπαιξε ως δανεικός από τον ΠΑΟΚ, όπως δεν έπαιξε και ο έτερος δανεικός από τον ΠΑΟΚ Δεληγιαννίδης. Ας δούμε όμως αυτούς πού έπαιξαν. Ο Νάστος, υπήρξε ποδοσφαιριστής και δη βασικός του ΠΑΟΚ. Ο Κοροβέσης επίσης έχει φορέσει τη φανέλα του ΠΑΟΚ. Ο Κομεσίδης είναι από την Ξάνθη και ο Κυριακίδης από τη Θεσσαλονίκη, πρώην του Ηρακλή. Ιδιαίτερη αναφορά όμως πρέπει να κάνουμε στον τερματοφύλακα Στρέζο, ο οποίος γεννήθηκε και ανδρώθηκε ΣΤΙΣ ΑΚΑΔΗΜΙΕΣ του ΠΑΟΚ, όπου αγωνίζονταν επί ΟΚΤΩ ΧΡΟΝΙΑ. Κάποια στιγμή, ο Ολυμπιακός ενδιαφέρθηκε γι’ αυτόν και τον απέκτησε, αλλά δεν κατάφερε ποτέ να γίνει κάτι περισσότερο από αναπληρωματικός του Βλάχου και του Χουτεσιώτη, πού ήταν τότε αναπληρωματικοί.

Ως δανεικός από τον Ολυμπιακό ο ΠΑΟΚτζής Στρέζος, έπαιξε σε διάφορες άλλες ομάδες, μέχρι πού βρήκε στον ΟΦΗ το αποκούμπι πού ζητούσε. Στον αγώνα λοιπόν της τωρινής του ομάδας με την ΠΡΩΤΗ του ομάδα, ο Στρέζος έπιανε ΑΕΡΑ. Και για τα ΤΡΙΑ ΓΚΟΛ του ΠΑΟΚ φέρει ακέραιη ευθύνη. Ήταν, πιστεύω το σοκ του να αγωνίζεται κανείς εναντίον της αγαπημένης του ομάδας. Φαντάζεστε το τρακ πού θα είχε, όποτε η μπάλα πήγαινε πάνω του ;

Όπως και να έχει, ο Στρέζος έδειξε τη μεγάλη του αξία προχθές, με μερικές ΚΑΤΑΠΛΗΚΤΙΚΕΣ αποκρούσεις πού έσβησαν την εικόνα του 1-3 από τον ΠΑΟΚ.

Στο 0-3 από την Αεκούλα, τερματοφύλακας αντί του Στρέζου ήταν ο Σωτηρίου. Έφαγε τα τρία γκολ χωρίς ανάσα. Πάνω στο ημίωρο, αποβλήθηκε και ο Κομεσίδης και η ομελέτα έδεσε. Α, να μην ξεχάσω, «έπαιζαν» και το Πλατέλας με τον Αραβίδη.


Πάμε παρακάτω. Η ιστορία του ΟΦΗ, από την εποχή πού θεσπίστηκε στη χώρα μας το επαγγελματικό ποδόσφαιρο ( τουλάχιστον ) είναι συνυφασμένη με το ΤΣΑΤΣΙΛΙΚΙ.

Αν θα έπρεπε να κάτσω μια μέρα να γράψω για τον ΤΣΑΤΣΙΜΟ του ΟΦΗ, θα γέμιζα άνετα τρείς τόμους, μεγαλύτερους σε όγκο του επικού «Πόλεμος και Ειρήνη» του Λέοντος Τολστόϊ !

Νομίζω ότι σήμερα απλά, συνεχίζει την παράδοση. Πολύχρονη παράδοση, όση και η ιστορία του, με μικρά διαλλείματα απουσίας, λόγω υποβιβασμού στις μικρές επαγγελματικές κατηγορίες.

Σήμερα ο ΟΦΗ ανήκει σε νέο μεγαλομέτοχο. Τον κ. Μιχαήλ Μπούση, επιχειρηματία στο Σικάγο. Τι ακριβώς εστί Μπούσης ;

ΑΠΟΚΑΛΥΠΤΩ : Είναι ανεψιός του μεγαλοεπιχειρηματία από το Σικάγο Μπομπ Κοζώνη είναι ο νέος μεγαλομέτοχος του ΟΦΗ ( πού πετάχτηκε ξαφνικά από το πουθενά ) Μιχάλης Μπούσης. Συγκεκριμένα, ο Κοζώνης έχει παντρευτεί την θεία του Μπούση.

Θυμόμαστε τον Μπομπ Κοζώνη από την αποτυχημένη προσπάθειά του να πάρει την κούλα, αρχές του 2010.

Ο Κοζώνης ήταν κάτι σαν … Παϊρόζ της εποχής του. Ανακατεύτηκε με τις φήμες περί αγοραπωλησίας της Κούλας, μέχρι και το 2013, οπότε και δήλωσε ότι αποσύρει το ενδιαφέρον του για αγορά των μετοχών της.

Η καταγωγή του Μπούση είναι από την Προσύμνη του Άργους. Είναι το χωριό του Φρανκ Κλώπα, παλιού παίκτη της Αεκούλας. Ο Κοζώνης που ήθελε κάποτε να πάρει την ΑΕΚ έχει πάρει την αδελφή του θείου του, Μπούσης και αυτός.

Το Σάββατο, παραμονή του αγώνα με τον Ολυμπιακό, ο ΟΦΗ εξόφλησε όλους τους παίκτες του, στους οποίους χρωστούσε αποδοχές ακόμα και πέντε μηνών. Σημάδι οικονομικής ευρωστίας, θα μου πείτε ίσως.

Ίσως … Θα δείξει, λέω εγώ. Απορώ όμως για ένα πράγμα. Αφού ο νέος επενδυτής Μπούσης ΥΠΗΡΧΕ, γιατί δεν είχε εξοφλήσει τους παίκτες της ομάδας του και πριν από τους αγώνες με τον ΠΑΟΚ και την ΑΕΚ ;


Πάμε τώρα στο κεφάλαιο διαιτησία. Δεν θα ρωτήσω κανένα τη γνώμη του για τη διαιτησία του Σέζου. Διότι έχω τη δική μου γνώμη και δεν με ενδιαφέρει κανενός άλλου.

Λέω λοιπόν -για όσους ενδιαφέρονται- ότι η διαιτησία του Σέζου ήταν ΑΘΛΙΑ και η παρουσία του ίδιου στο γήπεδο ως διαιτητής, ήταν ΑΙΣΧΡΗ και ΞΕΤΣΙΠΩΤΗ.

Δεν αναφέρομαι μόνο στο χέρι – πέναλτι πού δεν έδωσε, αλλά στην γενικότερη διαιτητική του εικόνα. Ο Σέζος έδινε όλε στις φάσεις φάουλ υπέρ του ΟΦΗ, ενώ έκανε το κορόιδο σε αντίστοιχες φάσεις υπέρ του Ολυμπιακού.

Από μία τέτοια φάση ξεκίνησε και το γκολ του Βουό. Ο Τσιμίκας έχασε τη μπάλα με ΦΑΟΥΛΑΡΑ σε μαρκάρισμα του Πλατέλα πού ΔΕΝ ΕΔΩΣΕ ο Σέζος. Στην εξέλιξη της φάσης αυτής, έγινε η σέντρα και ήρθε το γκολ του Βουό.

Και γιατί δεν έδωσε το φάουλ ; Διότι, αγαπητοί φίλοι, ο Πλατέλας ΕΙΧΕ ΗΔΗ ΜΙΑ ΚΙΤΡΙΝΗ και αν του έδειχνε και άλλη, θα έβγαινε από το παιχνίδι.

Το πέναλτι του Ποτουρίδη πού δεν δόθηκε, ήταν το αποκορύφωμα της ΒΡΟΜΕΡΗΣ ΠΑΝΤΑΧΟΘΕΝ διαιτησίας του Σέζου. Λίγη ώρα πριν, στη Θεσσαλονίκη, ο Ιταλός διαιτητής είχε δώσει πέναλτι σε ΠΑΡΟΜΟΙΟ ΧΕΡΙ, αμυντικού του Άρη, υπέρ του ΠΑΟΚ. Και ΠΟΛΥ ΣΩΣΤΑ το έδωσε, διότι το χέρι δεν ήταν κολλημένο στο σώμα.

Ο διαιτητής από το Κιλκίς ( και … όχι από τη Θεσσαλονίκη, έτσι ; ) Σέζος τα είδε αλλιώς, διότι το πέναλτι θα ήταν υπέρ του Ολυμπιακού, ΑΡΑ ΥΠΗΡΧΕ … ΑΠΑΓΟΡΕΥΤΙΚΟ !

Αν παρόμοια φάση – πέναλτι γινόταν υπέρ του ΠΑΟΚ, όχι απλά θα το σφύριζε, αλλά θα διέτρεχε και τον κίνδυνο να … καταπιεί τη σφυρίχτρα του από τη βιασύνη !


Ο διαιτητής Σέζος από το Κιλκίς, έδωσε τα διαπιστευτήριά του, αλλά παράλληλα έδωσε και διαπιστευτήρια γενικότερα, ΟΛΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΩΝ ΔΙΑΙΤΗΤΩΝ.

Ο διαιτητής Σέζος από το Κιλκίς ΑΠΕΔΕΙΞΕ και αυτός με τη σειρά του, ότι ΟΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΔΙΑΙΤΗΤΕΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΓΙΑ ΤΑ ΜΠΑΖΑ.

Ότι οι Έλληνες διαιτητές είναι ΣΚΟΥΠΙΔΙΑ της διεθνούς διαιτησίας.

Ότι οι Έλληνες διαιτητές είναι ΧΑΡΑΜΟΦΑΗΔΕΣ, ότι ε3ίναι ΧΡΥΣΟΚΑΝΘΑΡΟΙ, πού παρασιτοζωούν στο ελληνικό ποδόσφαιρο. Αυτή είναι η ΣΤΕΡΕΑ και ΑΝΥΠΟΧΩΡΗΤΗ ΑΠΟΨΗ ΜΟΥ και … ΣΕ ΟΠΟΙΟΝ ΑΡΕΣΕΙ. ΔΕΝ ΠΡΟΚΕΙΤΑΙ ΝΑ ΑΛΛΑΞΕΙ ΜΕ ΤΙΠΟΤΑ.

Ο Ολυμπιακός μέχρι τώρα είχε σε δύο μόνο από τους επτά αγώνες του ξένους διαιτητές και παρ’ όλα αυτά δεν κέρδισε κανέναν από τους δύο. Με τον ΠΑΟΚ έχασε μάλιστα, αλλά από άλλους λόγους, χωρίς ο ξένος διαιτητής να έχει την παραμικρή ευθύνη. Με την Αεκ ( 1-1 ) ο ξένος διαιτητής, πού πριν τον αγώνα είχε πολλά πάρε – δώσε με τον φίλο του Μελισσανίδη Τριτσώνη, έκαψε στην κυριολεξία τον Ολυμπιακό.

ΟΜΩΣ, παρ’ όλα αυτά, θα επανέλθω όσο το δυνατόν πιο ΠΙΕΣΤΙΚΑ γίνεται : Είναι ΑΝΑΓΚΗ να σφυρίζουν ΟΟΟΛΟΥΣ τους αγώνες του Ολυμπιακού ΞΕΝΟΙ διαιτητές και όχι τα ΣΚΟΥΠΙΔΙΑ της διαιτησίας από την Ελλάδα. Ειδάλλως, θα είμαστε άξιοι της μοίρας μας.


Χθες το απόγευμα έγινε γνωστό από ρεπορτάζ του γνωστού site της ΠΟΥΛΗΜΕΝΗΣ δημοσιογραφίας, ότι «κανένα θέμα δεν υπάρχει για τους διαιτητές του ΟΦΗ – Ολυμπιακός».

Καλέ … σώωωπα ! Σοβαρά μιλάτε, ή να βάλουμε τις φωνές ; μα, ήταν ποτέ δυνατόν, ΑΝΟΗΤΟΙ, να υπάρξει θέμα για διαιτητές πού ΑΔΙΚΗΣΑΝ τον Ολυμπιακό; Από … ποιόν, ρε ΚΟΠΑΝΟΙ, θα μπορούσε ποτέ να υπάρξει θέμα ; Από τους ΞΕΦΤΙΛΕΣ της ΚΕΔ ή από την ΕΦΘΑΡΜΕΝΗ ΕΠΟ της «εξυγίανσης» ;

Όλοι αυτοί, ΑΣΧΕΤΟΙ, τρώνε, πίνουν, κοιμούνται και ονειρεύονται σε ΡΩΣΙΚΟΥΣ ρυθμούς, άντε και σε Αεκίστικους ενίοτε, σε ήχο πλάγιο δεύτερο.

Σιγά λοιπόν μην υπήρχε κανένα θέμα με τους διαιτητές αγώνα πού έχασε ο Ολυμπιακός και πού ΣΥΝΕΒΑΛΑΝ και αυτοί με τη διαιτησία τους στην ήττα.

Α, να προσθέσω ότι … ούτε για τον διαιτητή του Λάρισα – Λαμία Κομίνη, υπήρξε κανένα θέμα με την ΚΕΔ.

Ελάτε τώρα, μα ήταν δυνατόν πάνω πού ο Κούγιας αποφάσισε να υψώσει τον τόνο της φωνής του σε διαμαρτυρία για τη διαιτησία και να αρχίσει τις ονομαστικές καταγγελίες, να τιμωρηθεί ο διαιτητής πού έκαψε την ομάδα του ; Πλάκα μας κάνετε, ή νομίζετε ότι είστε σε θέση να μας ταΐσετε κουτόχορτο ;

Σημειώνω : Παρατηρητής διαιτησίας στο ΟΦΗ – Ολυμπιακός ήταν κάποιος Ζαννετίδης, από τη Δωδεκάνησο. Τον ξέρει κανείς ; Εγώ πάντως πού διακονώ πέντε δεκαετίες τον χώρο, δεν μπορώ να τον θυμηθώ σε κανένα απολύτως ρόλο στην ελληνική διαιτησία !

Στο Λάρισα – Λαμία παρατηρητής ήταν ο Φλώτσιος. Ε, καλά τώρα …